Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 09:26:28 UTC No. 16417239

>>16417229
This is what happens when 90% of your department is glorified engineers and the rest are delusional nu-pythagoreans.

Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 11:08:41 UTC No. 16417305

>>16417229
What were they going to do, give it to another stringie who adjusted an equation to account for actual findings from a real researcher?

Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 11:18:59 UTC No. 16417316

>>16417305
HEY! Those physicists work hard making up bullshit like string theory and dark matter. They deserve all the praise in the world for wasting their lives and the collective effort of humanity. I mean if not for their failures we might be living on starships with teleporters by now.

Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 11:20:12 UTC No. 16417318

>>16417229
They really gave a CS nigger from my cringe university the nobel prize in physics

Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 11:59:34 UTC No. 16417343

the nobel price winners were selected by ai this year

Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 12:00:51 UTC No. 16417346

I know of some other software that's used a lot in science. Why not next year they give it to the guys who wrote Excel?

Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 12:28:13 UTC No. 16417388

>>16417305
Give it to the creators of the modified mass drop tagger which was used for discovering the higgs? Oh, right. Too specialized and the nobel committee is too stupid to know about it.

Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 14:56:50 UTC No. 16417564

Is physics the most impoverished current scientific field? It's been 100 years and physics is still stuck in the same century-old paradigm and every physicist can tell you that it's utterly wrong incomplete on a extremely fundamental level.

The Nobel Committee knows this and in their desperate search for notable scientific achievements they have fucking started awarding the price to engineers, meteologists, environmental scientists and now fucking ML engineers.

What a fucking joke discipline, no wonder all it produces are third-grade software devs of fraudster TV personalities.

Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 14:57:58 UTC No. 16417566

>>16417564
>every physicist can tell you that it's utterly wrong incomplete on a extremely fundamental level.


And the last 100 years of physics did nothing but confirm aspects of it.*

Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 16:47:20 UTC No. 16417714

>>16417229
>spin glasses aren't physics

Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 18:41:31 UTC No. 16417940

>>16417239
women took over physics and just like everything else they took over, they ruined it

Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 23:29:08 UTC No. 16418333

>>16417564
This is because scientists have become, as that one Jew puts it, "enormous fucking pussies".

Safe science is stifling science. Mad science is true science.

Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 23:33:08 UTC No. 16418339

>>16417305
give it to fucking peter shor???

Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 23:38:35 UTC No. 16418345

>>16417564
All because they refuse to acknowledge the possibility of FTL particles

Anonymous at Thu, 10 Oct 2024 02:13:30 UTC No. 16418499

>>16417229
Next year they are going to award it posthumously to Olivia Newton-John for her smash hit 'Physical'

Anonymous at Thu, 10 Oct 2024 04:15:24 UTC No. 16418622

>>16417316
this

leave mainstream alone! they are always correct!

Anonymous at Thu, 10 Oct 2024 11:54:41 UTC No. 16419024

>>16418345
This is what makes me laugh. The 'is reality local or not???' shit is basically just about whether a thing moves faster than light, lmao. "Nooo, you can't do that".