Image not available

828x743

IMG_1222.jpg

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ ๐Ÿงต Nature Complains About Lack of Women

Anonymous No. 16418156

The most prestigious medical journal in human history tweets that no women had received any Nobel Laureates this year.

What are the implications of this? Are women just not cut out to be in STEM?

https://x.com/nature/status/1844042203099975930?s=46

Anonymous No. 16418159

also btw fuck twitter for making big ass tweets that I canโ€™t properly crop

Anonymous No. 16418168

>>16418156
when are they going to accept that "equality" isn't some free lunch where minorities get assistance and favoritism in every human endeavor. If you want a nobel prize, do something of scientific merit, simple as.

Anonymous No. 16418185

>>16418156
>Are women just not cut out to be in STEM?
why even ask this question when everyone has already known the answer.
previously, like 20 years ago, being a woman in STEM is respectable. now you just assume the woman is a semi-crazy DEI hire because most of the time it is. you can only hope that you don't get fucked by them going apeshit on you. and by that, I mean, minimizing the interactions with them.
I know a L8 50-60 ish years old woman at a big tech company who is a 2nd wave feminist and hates those new DEI hiring practices, so much that she actually went on a rampage and did a series of presentations of what gender diversity and equity should look like (hint: it's not about quota and equal presentation).

Anonymous No. 16418237

>>16418168
>when are they going to accept that "equality" isn't some free lunch where minorities get assistance and favoritism in every human endeavor.
they already understand that, that's why they mostly push the buzzword "equity" (assistance, favoritism, redistribution to make everyone equal). always a massive red flag when they use that word.

Anonymous No. 16418245

>>16418237
it's retarded, I don't understand how they brainwash men into supporting their attempted coup