Image not available

940x1024

C5CE29B3-C684-486....jpg

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16418594

Why exactly can’t a null hypothesis be proven? It’s very easy to prove that there is no difference between two groups with some experimentation.

Anonymous No. 16418631

>>16418594
Because the null hypothesis is that your data _comes from_ a certain distribution. What you can check is whether or not your data _fits_ that distribution, which is not the same
Flipping a coin 10000 times and getting 4980 heads is not evidence that the coin is exactly 50/50. It's only evidence that the coin is not REALLY biased

Anonymous No. 16418851

>>16418594
>It’s very easy to prove that there is no difference between two groups with some experimentation
It's easy if you can do infinity amounts of experiments

Anonymous No. 16418996

>>16418594
No hypothesis can be proven, null hypotheses included.

Anonymous No. 16419163

>>16418594
Null hypotheses are inherently false because in our deterministic world
everybody is connected is convoluted ways

Image not available

1246x1781

1718445207766400.png

Anonymous No. 16422622

>>16418594
>Why exactly can’t a null hypothesis be proven?
NOTHING can be proven.
We either reject the null hypothesis, or fail to reject the null hypothesis. Those are the only options.