Anonymous at Fri, 11 Oct 2024 03:29:34 UTC No. 16420393

me
>t. Ashkenazi jew

Anonymous at Fri, 11 Oct 2024 03:30:40 UTC No. 16420396

>>16420390
theres tons of frauds and phonies in science these days

Garrote at Fri, 11 Oct 2024 03:32:42 UTC No. 16420402

The barrier between the conscious and unconscious is permeable.

Using conscious thoughts it is possible to affect the unconscious and determine that functions of the unconscious be performed, such as height gain, muscle mass gain, etc.

This is science!

Anonymous at Fri, 11 Oct 2024 03:33:47 UTC No. 16420408

>>16420396
Al Sharpton's pretty smart but I dunno if he's going to be the next Einstein

Anonymous at Fri, 11 Oct 2024 03:38:52 UTC No. 16420430

>>16420408
>Al Einstein's pretty smart but I dunno if he's going to be the next Sharpton

Anonymous at Fri, 11 Oct 2024 04:36:18 UTC No. 16420529

> Are there any physicists today like Einstein?
No. All the science that could be done with a few sheets of paper and pencil has been discovered. The low-hanging fruit have been picked.

Anonymous at Fri, 11 Oct 2024 05:03:34 UTC No. 16420552

>>16420390
Einstein was a weird combination of incredible quantitative skills with ultra-high creativity. Those people are very rare since both traits are rare by themselves let alone in a same person. Also, high creativity generally comes together with severe mental illness(Einstein is an amazing exception for the rule, but he did end up with a schizo son), those people generally don't make good academics since it is an environment tailored for more ordinary rule-following nerds.

In summa, for you to get an Einstein you need:
High Talent for Math/Physics + High creativity - severe mental illness. Which is incredibly rare.

Anonymous at Fri, 11 Oct 2024 06:43:02 UTC No. 16420620

>>16420390
Yeah probably but they get called cranks and crackpots, shouted down by mental midgets whose greatest talent is merely parroting everything they were taught.
If despite this they publish their papers are lost among a million others. the vast majority of which are trivial and mediocre waffle that have no application, no conceptual insights, and which no one cares about.
For this you can blame the proliferation of career donkeys churned out by Universities these days who have no spark of imagination, no creativity, a sore lack of critical thinking skills, and who utterly despise anyone who can think for themselves since it illustrates their own mediocrity.

Anonymous at Fri, 11 Oct 2024 07:40:59 UTC No. 16420659

>>16420552
Einstein sucked at math, he had some other guy do all the math for him.

Anonymous at Fri, 11 Oct 2024 07:49:24 UTC No. 16420664

>>16420402
Chat:
The detector’s interaction with the particle disturbs its quantum state. In quantum mechanics, any measurement process involves interaction with the system, often through an exchange of energy or momentum. For example, shining light or using electric or magnetic fields to detect an electron affects its trajectory.

Literally machine now knows more about quantum mechanics than you.

Anonymous at Fri, 11 Oct 2024 07:49:27 UTC No. 16420665

>>16420659
>Einstein sucked at math
you suck dick

Anonymous at Fri, 11 Oct 2024 07:50:33 UTC No. 16420666

>>16420659
He did not suck at math, he was excellent at it. What he did need help with was differential geometry. The topic was so new only a handful of people in the world at the time understood it.

Anonymous at Fri, 11 Oct 2024 10:26:11 UTC No. 16420784

>>16420665
>>16420666
>https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2006/may/22/science.research
>The archive was collected by Einstein's colleague Ernst Gabor Straus, a young mathematician whom the great physicist selected to help him during his Princeton years. "A lot of people think of Einstein as a mathematical genius - he wasn't," said David McMullan, a physicist at Plymouth University. He said Einstein used Straus as he had used other mathematically gifted colleagues in his early career. "Straus's mathematical virtuosity gave a framework to Einstein's intuitive vision of the universe."

Anonymous at Fri, 11 Oct 2024 13:19:53 UTC No. 16420918

>>16420659
>guy

Anonymous at Fri, 11 Oct 2024 13:49:06 UTC No. 16420952

>>16420784
>some guy says he wasn’t
woah, what a great argument

Anonymous at Fri, 11 Oct 2024 17:22:27 UTC No. 16421245

>>16420620
how do we fix this?

Anonymous at Fri, 11 Oct 2024 18:12:04 UTC No. 16421337

>>16420390
Pay attention OP...

Anonymous at Fri, 11 Oct 2024 19:56:57 UTC No. 16421555

>>16420659
for tackling general relativity he had use something very new: tensor calculus. there is no shame in getting help from the experts for this. it's like realising that a task needs a special tool and then going to the toolsmith for this.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 04:58:45 UTC No. 16422367

>>16420393
wow, there's that high verbal-IQ you guys like to brag about so much, impressive

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 05:10:40 UTC No. 16422382

>>16420390
>Are there any physicists today like Einstein?
you mean huge jewish frauds?
sure, but also doctors like the one who faked alzheimer research papers for 25 years

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 05:21:25 UTC No. 16422395

>>16421337
Sup?

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 08:36:11 UTC No. 16422527

>>16420390
Sabine obviously