🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Fri, 11 Oct 2024 20:12:55 UTC No. 16421587
How will /sci/ react when he dies?
raphael at Fri, 11 Oct 2024 21:08:07 UTC No. 16421760
>>16421587
nothing we have matt dilihaunty
Anonymous at Fri, 11 Oct 2024 21:20:52 UTC No. 16421793
>>16421587
my honest reaction
Anonymous at Fri, 11 Oct 2024 21:29:40 UTC No. 16421812
>>16421587
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Gw
Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 02:35:38 UTC No. 16422177
>>16421587
>How will /sci/ react when he dies?
"Nothing of value was lost."
Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 04:11:55 UTC No. 16422274
>>16421587
I will be sad... his contribution to the destruction of abrahamic cultists beliefs is unmatched.
Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 04:36:12 UTC No. 16422319
there's a reason so many people who fucking love science think he's amazing and it's not because he has a revolutionary intellect.
Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 04:45:38 UTC No. 16422338
I will be sad, I was already sad when Hitchens died.
Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 07:33:56 UTC No. 16422488
>>16422274
You must be a dimwit if you think he has a good argument against theism.
Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 07:54:59 UTC No. 16422500
>>16421587
like this
Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 08:06:30 UTC No. 16422510
I'm gonna fart in all scis userbases mouf using mind.
Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 08:36:28 UTC No. 16422528
>>16422500
kek'd and checked
Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 13:15:19 UTC No. 16422697
>>16421587
I celebrate the death of atheists.
Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 13:19:23 UTC No. 16422703
>>16421587
About the same as Rush Limbaugh's death.
Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 20:55:37 UTC No. 16423549
>>16421587
I will pray for him.
Anonymous at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 08:14:37 UTC No. 16424447
>>16421587
I would be just as sad over his death as he would be over mine.
>oh? what a shame! ribs! so anyways...
Anonymous at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 13:49:37 UTC No. 16427584
>>16421587
Fuck this transphobic cuntbag
Anonymous at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 14:04:51 UTC No. 16427739
>>16422500
Hit me right in the feels with that one.
Anonymous at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 15:48:22 UTC No. 16428384
>>16421587
ill be sad. He's one of the few atheists that didn't go absolutely insane with woke nonsense.
Anonymous at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 16:24:54 UTC No. 16428557
>>16422488
Why? Because you're afraid of Dawkins?
Anonymous at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 16:32:19 UTC No. 16428601
>>16421587
One of the most important scientists of all time.
Anonymous at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 18:22:09 UTC No. 16429001
>>16428384
>ill be sad. He's one of the few atheists that didn't go absolutely insane with woke nonsense.
Does this not count?
Anonymous at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 18:23:11 UTC No. 16429007
>>16428601
>One of the most important scientists of all time.
This! I remember when he invented...um...let's see...um...what the fuck did he invent again?
Anonymous at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 18:31:35 UTC No. 16429042
>>16429007
You think scientists get famous for inventing things? Are you stupid or just underage?
Anonymous at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 18:35:59 UTC No. 16429058
>He doesn't have to EARN fame!
Clearly.
Anonymous at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 19:48:11 UTC No. 16429259
>>16429001
Are you seriously grabbing tweets he said like a decade ago?
Anonymous at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 19:51:23 UTC No. 16429262
>>16429007
Memetics
Anonymous at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 21:54:10 UTC No. 16429546
>>16421587
Used to hate on him until I read The Ancestor’s Tale. Damn good book, made me see evolution in a mathematical and statistical way instead of a shitty “survival of the fittest” heuristic and he explained it beautifully.
Don’t know if he’s still writing atheist cringe or if he’s pumping out peak biology books, hope it’s the latter, but I will miss him a bit when he passes on.
Anonymous at Mon, 14 Oct 2024 01:58:44 UTC No. 16430003
>>16421587
GOAT of common sense. People who disagree with him are in denial.
Anonymous at Mon, 14 Oct 2024 02:46:32 UTC No. 16430093
>>16429259
Post the tweet where he recanted this pedo shit.
I haven't been able to find it.
Anonymous at Mon, 14 Oct 2024 03:10:46 UTC No. 16430132
>>16430003
I want to like him, but he's a coward.
He's said that people shouldn't study the intelligence difference between races.
If he was naive, I could understand, but he's not, he knows exactly where that will lead, and that's why he's against it.
Like, you can't be Mr evolution except when it makes your pet missing links look bad. That's academic dishonesty of the most vile sort.
For fucks sake, all he had to say was something like "biological differences don't have any bearing on human rights" or whatever.
Anonymous at Mon, 14 Oct 2024 03:22:33 UTC No. 16430153
>>16430093
Why would he recant any of that? He's absolutely right. Mild pedophilia is less harmful than more severe forms of child abuse (including religious indoctrination)
Anonymous at Mon, 14 Oct 2024 03:28:10 UTC No. 16430160
>>16430132
>"he doesn't support my preferred racial pseudoscience so he must be a coward"
Ok retard
Anonymous at Mon, 14 Oct 2024 04:24:08 UTC No. 16430238
>>16430160
>Evolution stops at the neck
>And only in humans
Surely you don't really believe that.
I'm not arguing that human rights don't apply to different types of humans.
Is it okay that that Polynesian tribe has that spleen thing for diving, or is that racist too?
Is that one okay because it doesn't involve the brain?
Anonymous at Mon, 14 Oct 2024 04:50:20 UTC No. 16430274
>>16430238
What does your incoherent rambling have to do with evolution?
Anonymous at Mon, 14 Oct 2024 04:51:52 UTC No. 16430276
>>16430274
I get that these ideas might be uncomfortable for you, but either evolution is true or it isn't.
If you'd like to argue that it isn't, I'm willing to hear you out.
Anonymous at Mon, 14 Oct 2024 04:58:25 UTC No. 16430283
>>16430276
Argue what? You clearly have no idea what evolution is.
Anonymous at Mon, 14 Oct 2024 05:02:10 UTC No. 16430287
>>16430283
So you prefer your political sacred cows overs scientific fact?
Okay, that's fine, but you're wrong.
Anonymous at Mon, 14 Oct 2024 05:12:29 UTC No. 16430300
>>16430287
You're just too retarded to understand that your racial pseudoscience has nothing to with evolution
Anonymous at Mon, 14 Oct 2024 05:22:59 UTC No. 16430313
>>16430300
You're welcome to make an actual counter-argument anytime.
Anonymous at Mon, 14 Oct 2024 05:31:00 UTC No. 16430324
>>16430313
You're welcome to demonstrate what your pseudoscience has to do with evolution
Anonymous at Mon, 14 Oct 2024 05:33:25 UTC No. 16430328
>>16430324
Okay, let's start with some basics.
Have different tribes of man evolved under different circumstances?
Are there different sunsets of humans?
Anonymous at Mon, 14 Oct 2024 05:36:29 UTC No. 16430329
>>16430328
I'm not interested in your braindead rhetoric. Argue your case, scientifically.
Anonymous at Mon, 14 Oct 2024 05:40:15 UTC No. 16430339
>>16430329
So, your argument is that all humans have evolved in exactly identical situations?
Anonymous at Mon, 14 Oct 2024 05:43:45 UTC No. 16430343
>>16430339
Ok, so I take this as an admission that you're unable to argue what your pseudoscience has to do with evolution.
Anonymous at Mon, 14 Oct 2024 05:48:10 UTC No. 16430350
>>16430343
The irony here is that you reject human potential.
Your argument is that all humans are limited to your constraints.
No human can be better than you in any way, because racism or whatever.
Ironically, your position here constrains humanity in laughably unrealistic ways.
Again I'll use the example of the Polynesian divers. How much oxygenated blood can you store in your spleen?
I mean, I can't hold my breath for like 20 minutes at a stretch.
Anonymous at Mon, 14 Oct 2024 05:51:56 UTC No. 16430359
>>16430350
>doubles down on the incoherent babble and pseudoscience
Ok schizo, you can go back to >>>/x/ or >>>/pol/ now
Anonymous at Mon, 14 Oct 2024 05:53:39 UTC No. 16430361
>>16430359
Wait, so you want me to accrue political power instead of having a conversation?
I mean, that probably ends badly for you.
Anonymous at Mon, 14 Oct 2024 12:18:49 UTC No. 16430758
>>16430238
The brain evolved and evolution would be compatible with different groups having different levels of intelligence, but it doesn't necessarily follow. There are many traits that evolved and yet different groups are on roughly the same level. You would have to additionally test the intelligence of those groups using some good metric and preventing biases. I know there is some research like that on IQ.
But honestly I don't know if truth trumps everything else. If not researching IQ prevents some civil war then maybe it's actually better not to open Pandora's box.
Anonymous at Tue, 15 Oct 2024 02:16:08 UTC No. 16432223
>>16429001
I dunno, what is mild pedophilia? I need more context on what his actual comments were. I can see being physically attracted to some post pubescent teenage girls to be a common thing for most men if they're being honest with themselves.
Anonymous at Tue, 15 Oct 2024 09:40:28 UTC No. 16432638
>>16429007
How new are you?
Anonymous at Tue, 15 Oct 2024 09:43:17 UTC No. 16432642
>>16421587
Make some memes obviously.
Anonymous at Tue, 15 Oct 2024 11:36:17 UTC No. 16432726
>>16421587
Obviously his ideas will go on so its not like something he represents will be really lost. But as a human being like everyone else, I will just be sad for him. Hope we will fuck the death in the ass eventually.
Anonymous at Tue, 15 Oct 2024 11:38:29 UTC No. 16432727
I'll probably turn into another song by imbred and make a troll post on sci - truly follow in OPs footsteps
Anonymous at Tue, 15 Oct 2024 22:23:55 UTC No. 16433526
>>16422274
Bro 2.8 billion people are Christians he hasn't made a dent. There's only estimated to be 500 million atheist worldwide most are asain and aren't really atheist its just classified as such because their philosophy doesn't have a deity.
Try again
Anonymous at Wed, 16 Oct 2024 09:07:05 UTC No. 16434099
>>16429262
He didnt tho. Se stole everything from george william and hamilton
Anonymous at Wed, 16 Oct 2024 09:30:56 UTC No. 16434118
>>16433526
>no gods
>not atheism