/sci/ 16421647 - Untitled Thread

View Same Yandex ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

620x620

dragonfly_620.jpg

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous at Fri, 11 Oct 2024 20:32:20 UTC No. 16421647

What would it feel like to be able yo see 300 fps?

Anonymous at Fri, 11 Oct 2024 21:14:47 UTC No. 16421777

>>16421647
>What would it feel like
Bzzzzzzz. 24/7/365.2425

Anonymous at Fri, 11 Oct 2024 23:43:49 UTC No. 16421992

>>16421647
take a 150mg edible and you'll find out

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 00:08:14 UTC No. 16422018

for insects days and nights just seem rather long as time moves at a different perceived speed to them. Flies don't have particularly marvelous reflexes but it's difficult to hit them since to them your hand appears to be moving very slowly. Oddly enough if you move slowly enough most insects won't even register you moving and you can catch them handily (with practice of course)

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 00:58:16 UTC No. 16422068

>>16422018
>Flies dont have particularly marvelous reflexes
Just googled it, flys have a 20 ms reaction time.

The best gaymers in the world with their 160 ms reaction time cant even keep up with cats, what you talking about?

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 01:08:49 UTC No. 16422076

>>16422068
You're full of shit. There are like a hundred sites that can test your reflex time and I've scored around 60ms in a trial 10 times in a row. if what you said is true then people with dialup would have no disadvantage over highspeed internet when it comes to games like counterstrike and everyone can tell you it makes a worlds of difference. Fighter pilots can recognize aircraft after seeing them for 1/200th of a second. Like, actually identify what they saw when it flashed in front of their eyes. Reflexes and eye sight depend on a lot of factors and isn't a blanket statement.

That said, if you were a character like quicksilver from marvel your life would be a living hell. You would perceive the world in ultra slow motion. TV wouldn't work for you, music would just be wobbling droning noises, and you would be bored out of your fucking mind. In the future when we have the ability to augment our mind an increase the processing speed will be able to alter or sense of time and drastically increase our reflexes and other abilities like how many objects you can track at one time (which is like 4 objects for the current person. imagine having the intelligence to multitask a thousand different things at once)

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 01:37:13 UTC No. 16422100

>>16422076
The lowest I can get consistently with a 360hz monitor is 110ms. And I already react fast. 22k rating on cs2 premier, was Global elite on CSGO and I'm Master 250 LP on League of Legends. Clearly my reflexes and hand eye coordination is at such a level that it allows me to reach near the top in very competitive environments. Being Master in LoL puts me in top 0.06% of players. Few people outreact me anywhere. If I only get 110ms and Ive proven to myself and millions of other players than I'm a top dog when it comes to reaction time then your claims of 60ms are just bullshit.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 01:39:26 UTC No. 16422105

>>16422076
I dont believe that you have a 60 ms reaction time.
Unless you are just randomly clicking. I can score 2 ms by randomly clicking.
Shroud scores about 160 ms and most people on /v/ think hes cheating.

>You would perceive the world in ultra slow motion
I actually disagree with that interpretation.
The best speed readers in the world are able to achieve thousands of words per minute, but they arent seeing the world in slow motion obviously.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 01:46:05 UTC No. 16422117

>>16422100
Your reaction time is shit because even my friends in highschool tested below 100. Maybe you're just not as gosu as you think.

https://zarpgaming.com/index.php/forum/general-discussion/59943-test-your-reaction-time
Just googled "other people's reaction times" and came across this. People can just get lucky and get extremely low times but there are some that get around 60-80ms. My friend psyched out the system once and got less than 10ms but that was pure luck.

🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 01:48:10 UTC No. 16422120

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 01:50:16 UTC No. 16422121

>>16422117
Stop larping kid. Anyone who has bothered to look 5 minutes into this knows you are just pulling shit out of your ass and any result in the sub 100s is just playing a prediction game and not a reaction game. Even the link you posted has posters saying they just predicted it...

This will be my last reply to your pathetic larp/bait. Whatever it is you are a moron that gets a rush from telling fake stories about himself online

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 01:51:52 UTC No. 16422124

>>16422105
I did it when I was 17 (which was a long time ago) and it was between 60-70ms, consistent in 10 tries. I was on adderall at the time so that might help a bit. But even then, I remember my friends all breaking under 100ms.

I was also doing it in as hardcore as I could. I know for a fact the corner of your eyes are more sensitive to light change, which is why you can see flickering lights/screens if you look at them at the corner of your eyes so I kept the red box->green box in the corner of my eye and had my finger set for a fast twitch motion as much as possible. We were all trying to break each other's scores.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 01:53:16 UTC No. 16422126

>>16422121
So you think it's more believable people are psychic than having faster reaction times than you? Are you that fucking insecure?

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 01:57:41 UTC No. 16422132

>>16422126
I think he means that people are trying to guess and attempt it enough times until they succeed so that they can take screenshots of amazing results.

Anyway here's the world record for reaction time and it's just at 50ms even with assistance from a tool. No one gets even near that without electrical stimulation.

https://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/world-records/693523-fastest-artificially-assisted-reaction-times

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 01:58:55 UTC No. 16422135

>>16421647
You already see in way more fps. You probably mean how would it be to have faster refresh rate of your temporal awareness.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 02:02:07 UTC No. 16422139

>>16422124
Holly shit, how come you and your friends aren't competiting to be the best gaymer or something?
https://youtu.be/1N_6kFDQRaE?t=4

>>16422126
not him, but you don't need to be psychic to randomly click and get lucky.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 02:18:24 UTC No. 16422158

>>16422139
In highschool we all played cs1.5 on highly competitive servers. There were 3 of us and we were all insanely good at it. I figured no one would believe me because even at the time we all thought it was unhumanly fast. You can believe me or not, whatever. Everyone else was getting between 90-110ms with at least one luck click at less than 10ms.

Even in that video you linked the guy wasn't taking it as seriously as I was.
>Peripheral vision is more sensitive to movement: Peripheral vision is more sensitive to movement than central vision.
I used the corner of my eyes to do the test with the monitor (it was an oldschool crt) practically at the side of my head and my finger had the mouse already pressed down a bit. All I had to do was twitch to get it pressed. When I just sat back and relaxed it was between 100-120ms rather than getting my whole body into it.

🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 12:53:18 UTC No. 16422678

>>16422068
>The best gaymers in the world with their 160 ms reaction time cant even keep up with cats, what you talking about?
2 times my cat tried to gouge my eyes.
Both times i reacted in timr(titled the head so it hit my hair)

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 13:48:59 UTC No. 16422733

>>16422678
yea its wierd.
when I play with my cats, I always feel like they are slow as fuck. But cats are quick.

https://youtu.be/7sWkzJz_n6Y

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 14:10:48 UTC No. 16422757

>>16422158
60-70 is about average with good hardware. I have luck clicked 1 ms.

View Same Yandex ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

720x901

hiller flying pla....jpg

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 14:39:27 UTC No. 16422796

>>16422068
Think big big brain.
You see thing, you react to it, it takes .6 milliseconds
Fly sees thing, fly reacts to it, it takes .2 milliseconds
The fly essentially perceives time three times more slowly than you. The fly isn't cracked out on meth waiting agonizingly to buzz away.
Again these are not cars racing. This is a matter of temporal perception. What feels like a day to you feels closer to a week to a fly.

>>16422076
>>16422105
there's is a difference in reaction times between things you anticipate and things you're not anticipating. Meditation or training can close this gap but 160 ms for something catching you totally off guard is reasonable. Although with this taken into account, flies may just be lazy. If this is the case then flies might perceive time four or six or more times slowly.

>>16422158
>~110 ms
This is is that middle ground between waiting to pounce and being caught of guard, an intermediary training stage with distractions to account for.
Caffeine helps with reflex time or so I've heard

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 15:45:57 UTC No. 16422902

People are usually vision-oriented. When you focus on something in your field of vision, it seems like a continuous movie, but it’s composed of many discrete and distinct “frames”. Humans usually have a visual framerate of 8-13 Hz (8-13 times per second), this is the alpha frequency in human EEG. What you have to do is train your brain to process and observe faster. In order to do this just put on an isochronic tone higher than 13 Hz, I recommend starting with 15-20 Hz. You will then focus on the sound. At first, it will be hard to even distinguish every beat, but you will be able to do it with practice. This is because whatever activates at the same time in your brain inevitably connects. So, if you have a high-frequency stimulus and at the same time you direct your attention to something specific, it's easier to accelerate the cognitive computation to that object of attention because it is connected to an inherently faster stimulus, forcing it to acquire the same frequency.

Once you can do this, focus on any point of your vision and with every beat try to concentrate as intensely as you can on that visual point.