๐งต Genius or Fool?
Anonymous at Fri, 11 Oct 2024 20:51:49 UTC No. 16421713
Should I keep following and researching his work? Or is it just a waste of scientific time?
Anonymous at Fri, 11 Oct 2024 21:52:54 UTC No. 16421835
>>16421713
>1x1=2
If you have to ask, you're ngmi
Anonymous at Fri, 11 Oct 2024 22:05:28 UTC No. 16421851
>>16421713
Nigga is dumb as a bag of rocks and highly overestimates his own intelligence. Being charismatic and having other personal/professional competencies doesn't suddenly make you a revolutionary genius as soon as you try your hand at something new.
Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 01:20:11 UTC No. 16422087
>>16421713
Follow your heart, anon.
Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 14:43:40 UTC No. 16422799
>>16421851
>T. Seething poltard incel.
He might not be right - in fact odds are he isn't - but at least he's intelligent enough to familiarize himself with the existing scholarship on the subject, develop his own ideas, and then defend them in a scientific manner. Thats a lot more impressive that you're typical white trash anti-science redneck type.
Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 14:49:55 UTC No. 16422807
I'm fine with people making retarded new ideas as long as
>they do some research to check to see if someone has thought of their idea already
>if someone has stolen their idea retroactively then they are still allowed to champion the same idea but person has a moral imperative then to investigate literature on the arguments
this is unrelated and might derail the thread but I see people ignoring this shit with "young earth creationism" where they pretend the lengthy serious debates about the topic 400 years ago never happened and if they did they aren't worth reading, even if they're willing to bet their eternal soul on the matter. Someone might interpret that as an attack but it's just an example.
I don't think anyone else during the enlightenment was claiming 1x1 = 2 but there were some other pretty funny ideas. Joke schools of thought are still schools of thought. There are in fact respectable colleges for clowns. The world likely needs more sober sane people with thorough understanding of conflicting methods of thought.
Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 14:51:37 UTC No. 16422810
>>16422799
Get off this board you fucking retard
Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 14:58:33 UTC No. 16422821
>>16422810
I agree
there's a fucking army of 80 IQ PhDs churning out academic garbage and rubber stamping their college of grift's associates papers. Then none of the raw data is published, none of the results are repeatable. The worst of it is in health and psychology, the real money farms. Though a lot of humanities "scholarly academia" is just surveys and either totally obvious shit or making it up.
>oh yeah this looks professional what do you think?
>yup it's peer reviewed
>now i need to write 20 more papers this year and teach a class to afford my new SUV
The end result is hilarious. Academics try to increase demands for their papers by demanding citations. The end result is like basic common sense can't exist unless some component of the thought involved has had token approval from some overworked bureaucrats.
And this shit isn't even good, often nobody looks over the sources except for some autistic German and so translation errors will linger in academic circles for 100 years. (this applies to the classics)
Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 15:02:08 UTC No. 16422827
>>16422799
You are literally more anti-science than the most brain rotted Infowars viewer out there if you don't have the willingness to call out bullshit when you see it. He didn't even do the bare minimum to "familiarize himself with the existing scholarship" on any of the subjects he vomits about. Yet you're here sucking his cock because he's "developed his own ideas" as if every flat earth or creationist retard out there on the right doesn't have the exact same impulses and approach that he did, only with a different ideological background.
Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 15:07:46 UTC No. 16422837
>>16422827
well at least he's made a display convincing enough to fool someone and that's what really matters in intellectual circles
Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 15:46:30 UTC No. 16422903
>>16421713
>Genius or Fool?
He's nothing more than a snake oil salesman that's been laughed at by his peers. I suspect the only reason he's got as far as he has is because he's black, and it took another black man to tell him he's basically a fuckwitt and his ideas need to fuck off along with him.
Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 15:51:02 UTC No. 16422923
>>16421713
Lmao this huckster is from the same TV show as Jussie Smollett. It's crazy that woke shitlibs always talk bout disinformation and muh """anti-science""", and how we need to criminalize disinformation because of Drumpf and Putin or something, but then when a low IQ nigger makes up blatantly false claims about integer arithmetic and other basic ass shit, the wokies refuse to question it.
Anonymous at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 05:47:46 UTC No. 16424240
>>16422810
Have sex
Anonymous at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 06:08:56 UTC No. 16424278
>>16422923
Go back to /pol/ chud
Anonymous at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 06:31:43 UTC No. 16424303
>no understanding of even undergrad levels of physics/chemistry
>no understanding of basic mathematical concepts used in physics/chemistry
Thank god science filters people like this by forcing them to learn courses of mathematics before being able to speak
Anonymous at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 09:29:27 UTC No. 16424560
>>16421835
>1 = 1^2
good try einstein
Anonymous at Mon, 14 Oct 2024 12:58:05 UTC No. 16430812
>>16422087
Ok will do. Thanks anon!