🧵 Supercomputer rendering
RETARD please be easy on me at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 13:54:43 UTC No. 16422736
So I’m sitting here thinking about things I’m not qualified to think about..
some guy built a computer in Minecraft, okay cool
But what if we built a supercomputer? Could an average PC run a rendered version of a supercomputer and display it on a rendered screen? Lets say we used CAD instead of Minecraft where in Cad you can apply limitless energy to a system and have no physical overheating, and if the entire monitor was also rendered in cad it could theoretically take over from the moment you turn on your computer. Also parts could be infinitely small and intricate because it never has to be physically produced.
So my question is: could a powerful PC render a supercomputer or does that violating physics
Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 14:09:47 UTC No. 16422754
>>16422736
I don't know, could you imagine yourself as a smarter person?
Barwkn at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 14:38:51 UTC No. 16422795
Yes
Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 14:42:58 UTC No. 16422798
A supercomputer is, by definition, more powerful than a regular computer, so you're asking a regular computer to emulate having more processing power than itself?
This is my first time on /sci/ in months, wtf happened here
RETARD please be easy on me at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 15:17:49 UTC No. 16422856
So is it a proven fact that a computer cannot emulate a stronger computer?
Could it emulate a computer with equal processing power but without the physical constraints? Like your emulation wouldn’t have to recreate heat or any type of energy loss
Can you only ever emulate a less complex computer?
Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:29:12 UTC No. 16422977
>>16422736
This is literally how God runs the simulation. Old Dell 486 emulating a quantum computer simulating the Universe. Keeps things warm and cozy.
Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:31:41 UTC No. 16422980
>>16422856
The lowly Universal Turing Machine is the most powerful computer ever invented. You're just impatient.
Barwkne at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:33:17 UTC No. 16422984
>>16422856
You're not retarded bro. The retards around you have trained you to think that you're below them. You're actually pretty smart bro. Live and let live.
Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:12:09 UTC No. 16423069
Here is a perfectly logical proof: Let’s assume a regular computer A that performs computation F in the most optimal time t1. Assume you can simulate a faster computer B that performs computation F in time t2 < t1. That means that computer A didn’t perform F in the optimal time as it could be performed in t2 on the same computer. Therefore t1=t2 but t1>t2. A contradiction.
Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:20:15 UTC No. 16423085
>>16423069
Let's assume your proof is correct. That would make you right. But you are an imbicile. Ergo, there is an error in your proof.
Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:23:31 UTC No. 16423093
>>16423085
That is an interesting proof. However you never proved that I’m an imbecile.
Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:24:18 UTC No. 16423096
>>16422736
if you are that into making circuits in minecraft, just download something like Logisim or DigLog and design circuits directly without the video game UI getting in the way
Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:26:39 UTC No. 16423102
>>16423093
Now you're just begging the question.
Barwkne at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:44:00 UTC No. 16423153
It depends if your computer has a certain part.
/Thread
Anonymous at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 11:32:58 UTC No. 16425154
Just run virtual machines.