Anonymous at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 02:55:19 UTC No. 16424061

>>16424046
genetic engineering will save the white hair line

Anonymous at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 03:09:12 UTC No. 16424084

>>16424061
faustian twist: the more gruesome of a hairline you can tolerate, the bigger your dick is, but losing your hair this way forfeits all benefit

Anonymous at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 03:09:33 UTC No. 16424085

>>16424046
Isn't that was abortion is? It's basically what you are talking about.
>The explanation has been well documented. In Iceland, upwards of 85 per cent of women elect to have prenatal testing, and close to 100 per cent of pregnancies where Down syndrome is diagnosed are terminated.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-05-01/iceland-prenatal-testing-down-syndrome-ethics/103781058

Anonymous at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 03:20:14 UTC No. 16424095

>>16424046
Topical azelaic acid, zinc sulfate and vitamin B6 are the best hair loss treatment in terms of locally inhibiting 5-AR enzymes without systemic effects. Other shit like onion juice, rosemary and hemp oils have had good recent clinical trial results, some phytochemicals actually work for hair loss.

>finasteride is trash

Anonymous at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 03:22:58 UTC No. 16424097

>>16424061
will it be affordable for middle class?

Anonymous at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 03:27:59 UTC No. 16424101

>>16424097
the what class?

Anonymous at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 05:05:29 UTC No. 16424201

>>16424046
I remember you. You are basically trying to put a square peg in a round hole. To have your cake and eat it.
The problem you want to solve has been solved but you are psychologically unable to accept the solution.
You want to reproduce your genes without reproducing them. Sums up your insanity.

Anonymous at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 05:54:11 UTC No. 16424251

>>16424095
man whomever traced over penn here is not a very good artist

Anonymous at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 06:58:13 UTC No. 16424334

>>16424095
you just need to get rid of enough oxidative stress and lower your estrogen
stop eating sneed oil and sugars
then mega dose taurine, glycine and glutamylcysteine
also get a good multimineral supplement, many multi vitamins have a good amount of various minerals
this is the easy way

Anonymous at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 08:25:17 UTC No. 16424466

Push it as population control. The Earth is running super low on its carrying capacity and so the best answer to that is to pay young women $5,000 to have their tubes tied. That’s it. The fact that only black and browns would consider doing that is the point, and also poor people in general. Why is that of benifit? Reduces the burden of low-IQ peasants, and making it about overpopulation provides moral cover for racism and hating the poor.

Anonymous at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 08:27:18 UTC No. 16424468

>>16424084
kek

Anonymous at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 10:10:57 UTC No. 16424685

>How do we repackage and reintroduce the idea of eugenics without being crucified as something to the effect of a Nazi?

This is literally not possible because nazi's will bring up those ideas within 1 second of you talking about eugenics. Eventually those ideas degenerate into pure racism and phrenology to the point that people will legitimately say black professors should not be able to have children because its fake black science and these people have no intellectual ability. People will talk about eugenics for skin tone.

It happens on /sci/ LITERALLY ALL THE TIME. MOST people on here LITERALLY believe they're smarter than Neil Degrasse Tyson (Columbia University Physics PhD) because he is black. Even though most people on here struggle with very basic math.

I understand eugenics is not inherently bad, its just impossible to present the idea to people and its mostly due to the kinds of people who are from of /sci/.

Anonymous at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 11:29:51 UTC No. 16425131

>>16424085
>Close to 100%
What kind of sadist is being an actual downs into the world? Do they have any idea how poor the quality of their life will be? That's just evil.

Anonymous at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 11:43:42 UTC No. 16425241

>>16424685
I don't think I am smarter than Neil Degrasse Tyson, but a legitimate criticism to a position like this is the question of how much affirmative action African academics got.

Anonymous at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 15:48:52 UTC No. 16428390

>>16424685
Im smarter than Tyron de Nuggets but thats just a coincidence, it has nothing to do with his race

Anonymous at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 16:03:57 UTC No. 16428461

>>16424685
HOLEEEY COW if I had coins i would 100% give you an award thank you so much for the epic comment <3

Anonymous at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 16:07:49 UTC No. 16428485

>>16428390
I'm smarter than Mike Tyson because I haven't been bonked in the head as many times.

Anonymous at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 16:10:47 UTC No. 16428501

>>16424085
>"experts" are concerned
Probably jews

Anonymous at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 16:18:45 UTC No. 16428535

>>16424046
Let nature take it's course.
We either impliment eugenics now, or nature will collapse civilization and cull the mutants for "us" (we're the mutants).

Anonymous at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 16:53:26 UTC No. 16428695

>>16424046
ugliness is subjective and changes with fashion
big forehead used to be desirable trait for several centuries

if you push eugenics for things other than objectively defective and debilitating conditions (Down's, Huntington's, etc.)
you end up with severely dysgenic population instead
look at what dog breeders are doing

Anonymous at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 17:26:59 UTC No. 16428861

>>16425131
Downies are arguably the happiest people in the world
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3740159/

Anonymous at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 18:11:34 UTC No. 16428970

>>16428695
That look (pic) was achieved by shaving back the hairline, not selective breeding.

Anonymous at Mon, 14 Oct 2024 17:16:36 UTC No. 16431383

>>16424685
>it's impossible because of my boogeymen

Anonymous at Mon, 14 Oct 2024 18:25:39 UTC No. 16431491

They're already trying that with human biodiversity
Once commercial genetic engineering is a thing eugenics will take off again because sterilization and optimal breeding won't be important anymore. I wouldn't be surprised if you start seeing liberals advocating for eugenics equity or something in the 2030s or 40s.