/sci/ 16424562 - Untitled Thread

1467x841

GCSE gender gap m....png

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 09:30:37 UTC No. 16424562

So I was looking through the sex differences in GCSE results in England (https://analytics.ofqual.gov.uk/apps/GCSE/Outcomes/) and something really astonished me. Some things are consistent with what has been shown time and time again, girls do better in English, Humanities ect, boys do better in Mathematics and Physics, so not many surprises. But one thing truly took me off guard. See I was under the assumption that all gender differences in scores were due to stereotypes and discrimination, after all men aren't pushed into social jobs and pushed to read as women are, and women aren't as pushed to STEM as men are, so it makes sense that in more stereotypically masculine subjects, men would do better, and in more stereotypically feminine subjects women would do better. So I thought "whats the most stereotypically masculine subject here?" and landed on physical education. After all men's defining feature compared to women are their strength and ability in the physical sense, so I look at the stats and to my surprise, in physical education females are absolutely dominating over men, and not by a little by A LOT. Why is this? Are English men/boys frail nerds or is something else at play here? Whats the science here?

Anonymous at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 10:05:11 UTC No. 16424656

You are aware that PE is segregated and boys and girls have different requirements, yes? This is the only subject where this is the case. Also girls mature faster physically than boys of the same age.

Anonymous at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 10:06:56 UTC No. 16424664

>>16424562
Is the cutoff for attaining A/7, etc. the same for males as for females?

Anonymous at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 10:14:29 UTC No. 16424700

OP a 12 year old female is nearly halfway through the majority effects of puberty (80+% developed by 15) while a male has just barely started (80+% by 19)

Anonymous at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 10:30:05 UTC No. 16424765

>>16424562
>Also girls mature faster physically than boys of the same age.

The GCSE's are taken at 16 years of age. A 16 year old girl isn't going to be as physically powerful as a 16 year old boy, so I don't know here you are coming from with this.

Anonymous at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 10:31:08 UTC No. 16424768

>>16424765
Oops meant
>>16424656

Anonymous at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 10:35:42 UTC No. 16424785

>>16424562
Men simply aren't pushed to become toxically masculine, because we live in a terrible mariarchy in which any men saying or doing something that would make a woman or non-White uncomfortable results in a false rape sentence and jail. Men are shamed for speaking their beliefs, and they have absolutely nothing to fight for since women are whores and it takes a lot of knowledge to even obtain a low iq RV wife, let alone a country which loves or respects them. This nation absolutely despises masculine Western men, so obviously you're absolutely not going to see swole shirtless spirited National Socialists young men running along the beach screaming "nigger" except in the exception that said men are either National Socialists of Hitler's day or just really hate Jews. This happened, and White men got together to speak their mind and promote national and physical health in the US state of Florida. Do you know what happened? Antisemitism was banned and those people were punished for speaking against the people who actually rape our children.
>b-but can't you just do 1000 pushups and like not hurt the feelings of women and negroes?
Humans accomplishing difficult things requires a REASON, anon, and only a "mentally ill" "hateful" idealogue can possibly do well in fitness (or a brainless person who was born with wealth and a pretty face).

Anonymous at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 12:43:57 UTC No. 16426281

>>16424765
NTA, but learn to read.