Image not available

392x498

fe676d22ac675fdb6....gif

๐Ÿงต Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16430748

if quarks can't be separated, doesn't that mean they're not particles?
I just read on the internet that protons are made of quarks, therefore they are not undivisible particles. but, according to the rules of the universe, it's impossible to separate those quarks and have a quark alone not bound to anything. doesn't that imply that quarks aren't real particles? protons are fundamental particles then

Anonymous No. 16430751

>>16430748
>according to the rules of the universe, it's impossible to separate those quarks and have a quark alone not bound to anything
the top quark does that. It is so heavy that it decays before it can hadronize

Anonymous No. 16430763

quarks have never been observed
it's just a mathematical construct that makes the theory fit observations

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ PAPAB00T No. 16430767

>>16430763
Fags have never been observed.

Until now...