ποΈ π§΅ Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Mon, 14 Oct 2024 14:17:43 UTC No. 16430925
Scientifically speaking, are companion robots a good thing or a bad thing?
Anonymous at Mon, 14 Oct 2024 14:21:03 UTC No. 16430931
>>16430925
A good thing short term that will become a bad thing in the long term.
Anonymous at Mon, 14 Oct 2024 14:31:25 UTC No. 16430952
>>16430931
What are the long term negative consequences?
Anonymous at Mon, 14 Oct 2024 20:14:55 UTC No. 16431689
>>16430925
this image doesn't take into account the inflation of the future. it should read 7ft tall, 7pack abs, 7 fig
Anonymous at Mon, 14 Oct 2024 20:25:17 UTC No. 16431716
>>16431689
Chadbot can meet those benchmarks.
Anonymous at Mon, 14 Oct 2024 20:55:25 UTC No. 16431802
I think a 7' Tom Brady bot with a horsecock that ejaculates chocolate would sell well among women.
Anonymous at Mon, 14 Oct 2024 20:58:32 UTC No. 16431806
>>16430952
The death of humanity.
Anonymous at Mon, 14 Oct 2024 21:09:13 UTC No. 16431833
>>16430925
men desire submissive women
we will get submissive women
if our women don't want to be submissive we will get new ones, be they asian, alien or robotic
>>16431716
robots will be able to fuck and suck long before they will be able to make 6 or even 7 figures
women will break while men rejoice
I fully expect an abolition of women's rights spearheaded by women who label it a failed experiment
Anonymous at Mon, 14 Oct 2024 22:07:33 UTC No. 16431925
>>16431806
He said negative.
Anonymous at Mon, 14 Oct 2024 22:59:38 UTC No. 16432014
>>16430925
They're bound to happen anyways. Humans are literally longing for slaves, otherwise people wouldnt be so desperately trying to make the human form factor work, theyd just keep designing new specialized hardware.
>muh infrastructures designed for humans
Literally just hang the robots on the ceiling with a railing system and that solves 90% of the humanoid usecases. Youre not doing it because you either want a slave or a sexbot. Or both.
Anonymous at Tue, 15 Oct 2024 22:23:25 UTC No. 16433523
>>16430925
Why do incels think 666 is too much?
Anonymous at Tue, 15 Oct 2024 22:42:59 UTC No. 16433560
>>16431833
>be they asian, alien or robotic
Why did you say asian thrice?
Anonymous at Tue, 15 Oct 2024 22:55:16 UTC No. 16433576
>>16433523
Tall men are inferior to short ones and women's preference here is wrong and must be changed or just ignored
Thankfully we're going to genetically engineer men to be small and women to be tall. Women will have to get used to it
Anonymous at Wed, 16 Oct 2024 08:56:02 UTC No. 16434092
>>16430925
Good. Only incels would use them anyway. The top 10% who can afford real human flesh women will still go for them
Anonymous at Wed, 16 Oct 2024 13:39:20 UTC No. 16434365
>>16434092
The future is synthetic, real flesh is outdated.
Anonymous at Wed, 16 Oct 2024 14:31:09 UTC No. 16434420
>>16434092
And 98% of women get nothing.
Anonymous at Wed, 16 Oct 2024 15:35:05 UTC No. 16434539
horsecock and chocolate cum mentioned
Anonymous at Wed, 16 Oct 2024 16:48:51 UTC No. 16434650
>>16430931
>>16430952
>>16431806
considering the amount of surplus men, it will be a good thing in the long run
Anonymous at Wed, 16 Oct 2024 16:55:33 UTC No. 16434663
>>16431806
Feminism has already made a 0.0 birth rate itβs ultimate goal.