Image not available

1075x1468

graham-hancock-e1....jpg

🧵 Why do historians and ancient scientists hate him so much?

Anonymous No. 16435092

I mean he's definitely onto something. We know Empires have existed way north of 100,000 years. There are monuments that already existed before the Egyptians and etc. Aztec and Mayan mythology explicitly states things that natural occurrences that were accurate to historical cataclysms, regional or worldwide. China also has something similar the only thing being similar is the "mass flooding" event. It's universally accepted in majority of myths and legends of different human races.

Anonymous No. 16435211

He's been in the game so long that gobekli tepe is actually in textbooks now.
Is slowly becoming mainstream

Anonymous No. 16435227

Some of his shit is pretty schizo but 95% of the anger directed at him is because established academics HATE being told they're wrong

Image not available

493x498

pepe-nervous.gif

Anonymous No. 16435283

>>16435227
They give too much importance to irrelevant details, at the same time they forget deception and manipulation are common in competitive environments. Several hundreds of millennia ago humans were already capable of all those great things they attribute to space aliens or other humanoid species.
We know that something nerfed humans right after the bronze age collapse, and that something could be other humans with the desire to have undisputed control over the planet. In such case they are an existential threat to our civilization.

🗑️ Anonymous No. 16435343

>>16435283
Yes there is a World Active Group right now running shit behind closed curtains. Western Europe already fell to their dirty greasy hands, America is going to if anyone other than Trump wins and lets just say they know the real threat of China.

Anonymous No. 16435347

>>16435283
Yes there is an Active WORLD ORDER Group right now running shit behind closed curtains. Western Europe already fell to their dirty greasy hands, America is going to if anyone other than Trump wins and lets just say they know the real threat of China.

Anonymous No. 16435497

>>16435092
he went on Joe Rogan and was so obscenely retarded even Joe started to push back against his bullshit

Anonymous No. 16435569

>aliens built the pyramids

Anonymous No. 16435624

Scientists fear that people like Graham are fueling distrust in academia and that causing public grant funding to decrease. Considering Graham is the most famous archaeologist in America and the most famous physicist is a fedora tipper, they need better marketing.

Anonymous No. 16437019

>>16435624
what's worst a grifter or seller of snake oil?

Anonymous No. 16437667

you are all retarded and graham made a fortune because of your kind.

Anonymous No. 16437681

>>16435497
Not what I saw in that debate.

Anonymous No. 16437683

>>16435092
>We know Empires have existed way north of 100,000 years.
Well, pretty much that is why he is hated.
Though that is what historians think he is saying, when in reality he is way more rigorous than that, so he never really said it.

Anonymous No. 16437701

>Start season 2 of his netflix show
>Keanu Reeves out of nowhere
>they waffle on for for a few minutes and don't introduce anything new, just repeat what the show already covered in the minutes before
>Keanu doesn't come up again in the episode
I dunno if he pops up again later on in the show, but the formatting of this programme is absurd already. No idea how people can take it seriously. Its like he is trying to be the Carl Sagan or archaeology without the "Dude, weed" element.

Anonymous No. 16437742

The way they try to push back is so rudimentary and shows clear signs of lack of effort/laziness. It gives off the smell that they don't know how to holistically and coherently make arguments against him, and going a bit deeper, that shows signs that archaeologists themselves are bullshitting. They need to appear authoritative, but their arguments and evidence can't back up that appearance, therefore they do the tried and true "he's a racist" argument and distorting facts. The whole things is a shitshow from both sides. The most revealing point by Hancock's work has been in showing incompetency of archaeology

Anonymous No. 16437759

>>16437681
Then you're a dipshit too. Even Joe was pointing out how shaky Graham looked when he was claiming he saw "clear evidence of manmade structures" when diving but somehow just never bothered to take more than two blurry pictures, and all the other shit he was saying. It was a huge change from how supportive Joe normally is of Graham.

Anonymous No. 16437776

>>16437759
Give me a timestamp for that. If we speak of the same debate,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-DL1_EMIw6w
the only two valid counter-argument I heard is ships from that old have never been discovered and domesticated wheat only appears where historians tell it appeared. And here's the counter-counter-argument about the ships:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PEe72Nj-AW0

Anonymous No. 16439476

>>16437759
did joe get a friendly kompromat reminder so he went full support for graham again?

Anonymous No. 16439591

>>16435092
he's controlled opposition selective disclosure like david icke

Anonymous No. 16439806

>>16437776
>spoonfeed me
No. You're a big boy, you can go look it up yourself. It's not even very far in.
Graham had absolutely nothing of value to say. I used to actually respect him somewhat for at least being interesting, but his arguments were absolutely incoherent and he did every single thing he accused "le mainstream academics" of doing.
>ok you searched millions of sites and never discovered any evidence of what I said b-but have you searched literally the entire planet??? checkmate atheists
>spends ungodly amounts of time and slides complaining about Flint's twitter posts with 14 likes
>claims he visited sites which are clearly man made megaliths
>somehow didn't bother to get more than a handful of blurry pictures, can't even convince Joe Rogan despite being his friend
>accuses Flint of wanting to silence him and not debating facts
>is actually the first to drag the debate away from facts and into personal spats and absolutely braindead arguments
I'm not even going to waste any time pretending to take Graham seriously after that performance.

Anonymous No. 16439820

>>16437742
>he's a racist"
It is a bit racist saying Brits couldn't have built Stonehenge, mate. Like, I moved a huge plant pot weighing at least a tonne from one end of the patio to the other on my own with a few bits of wood. And I'm not even tall let alone a giant. Let people have pride in their race and don't go around making up nonsense and people won't call you a racist.

Anonymous No. 16439822

Fucking anti-white racist

Anonymous No. 16440642

>>16437742
Not really. Graham couldn’t even answer how we supposedly had a globe spanning civilisation yet we haven’t found evidence of a single ship.

Image not available

315x331

-'-'&#0....jpg

Anonymous No. 16440805

>>16435092
Ready for round 2 Graham?

Anonymous No. 16440850

>>16440642
All the continents used to be connected so they didn't need ships

Anonymous No. 16440863

>>16435092
because he's a retard
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zU-wQVAqQnk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OZGp6N3AHTA

>but they're so loong
fuck off goldfish

Anonymous No. 16440882

>>16440850
>All the continents used to be connected
yeah in the Triassic era, now you're just proposing some Flintstones shit

Image not available

493x765

era.png

Anonymous No. 16440905

>>16440850
>>16440882

Anonymous No. 16440923

>>16435092
Because he is probably right. But obviously that would go against the status quo

Anonymous No. 16441072

>>16440923
can you show us some artifacts from this ancient civilization?

Anonymous No. 16442081

>>16441072
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2BXsMgp8KLc

Anonymous No. 16442090

>>16435092
>Why do ancient scientists hate him so much?
The beef between him and Aristotle was the stuff of legend.

Anonymous No. 16442096

>>16442081
Graham talks about civilizations much older than this though. Gobekli Tepe is already well known.

Image not available

590x711

graham&zahi.png

Anonymous No. 16442101

>>16442096
It wasn't known when he began speaking:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Ziu2ygE_Wc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q4NnCAZcxHg&t=0s

Anonymous No. 16442176

>We know Empires have existed way north of 100,000 years
No we don't

Anonymous No. 16442182

>>16442101
You're not answering the question. Graham talks about civilizations which are far older than Gobekli Tepe. This is not evidence for the ages he is talking about.

Anonymous No. 16442188

>>16435283
People who live in tunnels of any race that made humanity not dwell near each other anymore. The gobleki tepe was a water hole and they built the structure around the hole so they could grab some water, then go out and hunt. This allowed them to build the first civilization because they saved energy on trying to find water.

Anonymous No. 16442205

>>16442182
I'm not even his reader. I guess he speaks of different moments in time at different of his claims (one of his claim is that indiginous people from South America have common genes with asians or polynesians, which people from North America do not have: different geography, thus different episode of the timeline he is trying to reconstruct)

Anonymous No. 16442218

>>16435092
Egotists don't like someone making them look dumb.

Anonymous No. 16442220

>>16440642
They not only had ships, they also had globes. The Montgolfier were inspired by a demonstration of a device smaller in scale that was banned by the Spanish Inquisition centuries ago. And the idea to build such device came from a man who visited ancient ruins in South America and later moved into Europe to try to get funding to build the device at full scale.

Anonymous No. 16442221

>>16435092
Egyptians built an entire tourist industry spanning 2,000 years around pretending to have built the pyramids. But it turns out they only vandalised them, and the pyramids were much more beautiful and perfect before being destroyed by a bunch of brown retards. Obviously they don't want this information going mainstream.

Anonymous No. 16442251

>>16442220
Ok. Can we see evidence of these ships from this ancient civilisation?

Anonymous No. 16442641

>>16442221
Kek. This is what I'm voting for next fortnight.