Image not available

450x407

1729246941282182.png

๐Ÿงต Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16437749

How can you believe in evolution if it's just a theory? (a guess)

Anonymous No. 16437816

>>16437749
everything in physics is a theory, and look where we are now

Anonymous No. 16437823

>>16437749
Prove to me all life on Earth didn't come via Panspermia, more specifically Panspermia via the impact of Theia and ancient Earth.

YOU CAN'T!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Abiogenisis is a bullshit theory that all these well paid fags in labcoats have failed to prove. It's the basis of all Evolutionary science and it's all bullshit you can't prove. Panspermia is just as valid a theory. But you can't speak about it now can you. This thread will fill with low IQ parrots repeating talking points faggots in tweed jackets brainwashed them with in exchange for tens of thousands of dollars.

Anonymous No. 16437885

>>16437823
Explain genetic similarity along with the fossil record without sounding schizophrenic

Image not available

300x300

1729197857725878.png

Anonymous No. 16437886

>>16437816
No it isn't retard. Everything on theoretical physics is a theory retard.

Like string theory or quantum gravity. Those aren't expirementally proven retarded. Just like we can't prove species evolved from a primordial soup.

It's just a religion. People want to believe

Anonymous No. 16437899

>>16437823
>>16437816
>>16437749
>>16437885
>>16437886

Why did you start a separate thread you illiterate monkey?? Stay in your thread OP

Anonymous No. 16437934

>>16437749
A GAME theory.

Image not available

1238x1148

3,14.jpg

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ Anonymous No. 16437938

>>16437749
no you can mathematical prof evolutioon bht the first humans where still machined

Anonymous No. 16437939

>>16437938
m e n t a l
i l l n e s s

Anonymous No. 16437942

>>16437749
*geuss

Anonymous No. 16439888

>>16437942
*gauss

Anonymous No. 16439898

Evolution is a fact. Mechanisms of evolution are a Theory.

Anonymous No. 16440649

>>16437749
colloquially the word theory is synonymous with the word hypothesis. that is not the correct way of understanding the word theory within a very strict scientific sense. a scientific theory should make specific predictions into the future. the current "theory" of evolution cannot make predictions into the future and therefor isn't truly a theory. the word hypothesis or framework would be better word to describe it.

why believe this hypothesis? because there is a lot of evidence to support it. the fact that all of life shares a lot of genes strongly supports the idea of a common ancestor.

Anonymous No. 16440653

>>16437886
But look at we are now. We ARE strapped to this earth (and not a different earth)

Image not available

1094x253

1727512627515739.png

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ Anonymous No. 16440916

How can you believe the angles in a triangle add up to 180 when it is only a conjecture? (a guess)

Image not available

1091x342

1718408110417188.png

Anonymous No. 16440920

How can you believe the angles in a triangle add up to 180 when it is only a conjecture? (a geuss)

Anonymous No. 16440922

>>16437749
Just another social construct desu

Anonymous No. 16440928

>>16440920
Is it really an axiom? haha

Anonymous No. 16440946

We didn't come from monkeys, that results in a totally different grand species.

Anonymous No. 16440959

>>16440928
No, axioms aren't mentioned until the very last chapter of the book. Until then, everything but Napoleon's theorem and the Pythagorean theorem is called a conjecture.

Image not available

540x473

dogfrogs.png

Anonymous No. 16440969

If cells weren't composed of water and didn't evaporate in space, if cells could reproduce despite there not being water for the cells to exist like they do on earth, and they were exposed to the conditions of space including vacuum, would they eventually adapt to the conditions in space through exposure alone? I've talked to ChatGPT about this and it said that one of the main issues about space is the absence of required conditions that make water not evaporate and as a consequence, cells not being able to reproduce in space due to this. If magically there were some type of living organism that wasn't mainly composed of water and could reproduce without it, would this mean that there could in theory be ''living'' things in space and that they would adapt to the conditions?

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ Anonymous No. 16440971

>>16440969
This makes no sense faggot. Try type your thoughts harder and clearer. You midget.

Anonymous No. 16440972

>>16440971
Seems like you need classes in reading comprehension, anon.