🧵 True physics end game
Anonymous at Fri, 18 Oct 2024 15:13:51 UTC No. 16438039
In the end it's all about energy. The only end game is you getting an infinite amount of it, and/or you have infinite control over it.
In actual terms this would translate into free energy and/or star-trek replicators where you can spawn in any item at will.
Now, please explain how does the current direction of physics models and request for colliders in anyway inches toward this ultimate end goal and is not just a con for cash.
Anonymous at Fri, 18 Oct 2024 15:31:29 UTC No. 16438085
Not infinite, you'll have maximum \'mass' amount of energy.
Anonymous at Fri, 18 Oct 2024 15:50:45 UTC No. 16438110
>>16438039
I don't think there is an endgame anon.
World energy consumption has only been increasing anon. With the proliferation of Ai energy consumption Will only increase.
Now the question can we sustain this? The law of thermodynamics kind of limits our ability to consume long term.
We may go back to being primitive monkeys anon
Anonymous at Fri, 18 Oct 2024 15:55:55 UTC No. 16438123
>>16438110
There's more thermal energy in iceberg than cup of coffee...
Literally we'll begin to cool stuff out to obtain energy.
Anonymous at Fri, 18 Oct 2024 16:07:36 UTC No. 16438138
>>16438123
Incorrect anon. Think of energy as action or motion. When things are frozen the particles slow down.
Steam has energy because the particles are exiceted and moving around rapidly.
Think of a car. No energy or gas no motion. A car without energy is a brick.
Anonymous at Fri, 18 Oct 2024 16:12:31 UTC No. 16438147
>>16438138
No, there isn't energy, because it wiggles, there is energy only because energy dissipates to places with lower energy, therefore forming thermal gradients.
You must artificaly create thermal gradient, with low point of energy, so ambiental heat will flow there and you use energy because you make it as obstacle in it's path that it'll overcome.
Just temperature is nothing, there's no energy without something being cold, so it contrasts.
Anonymous at Fri, 18 Oct 2024 16:21:45 UTC No. 16438168
>>16438138
TL;DR
Energy is difference between two states. Potential.
Anonymous at Fri, 18 Oct 2024 16:47:03 UTC No. 16438201
>>16438147
Ok Mr wiggles.
Let's get out the formal abstractions back into reality.
How can I convert the energy from an iceberg into work or motion?
Ill never get sn answer because you cant.
Anonymous at Fri, 18 Oct 2024 16:57:37 UTC No. 16438228
>>16438039
Energy costs are only 5% of budget in the U.S. there’s just not enough payoff to physics research to generate energy. As for Europoors, you could quintuple your energy overnight by just lifting Russian sanctions.
Anonymous at Fri, 18 Oct 2024 16:59:41 UTC No. 16438234
>>16438123
There’s a billion cups of coffee made in a day. Are there a billion icebergs and if so what happens when we use them up?
Anonymous at Fri, 18 Oct 2024 17:31:24 UTC No. 16438296
>>16438228
>political definition of energy
Everything is energy. Physics is literally the study of energy.
Anonymous at Fri, 18 Oct 2024 17:45:55 UTC No. 16438326
>>16438201
Just boil liquid nitrogen in a turbine or whatever.
You can.
Anonymous at Fri, 18 Oct 2024 17:53:11 UTC No. 16438335
>>16438326
Test
Anonymous at Fri, 18 Oct 2024 18:47:32 UTC No. 16438423
>>16438039
>In the end it's all about energy
Why not matter? Or space? Or time?
Anonymous at Fri, 18 Oct 2024 19:37:57 UTC No. 16438496
>>16438296
Physics is the study of showing pretty space photos (artist renditions) of exo planets in order to scam the government to fund your new telescope upgrade
Anonymous at Sat, 19 Oct 2024 18:08:51 UTC No. 16440074
>>16438039
yeah
Anonymous at Sun, 20 Oct 2024 06:22:45 UTC No. 16440849
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C4J
the real endgame
Anonymous at Mon, 21 Oct 2024 13:07:19 UTC No. 16442479
>>16438039
No its not, retard. Kys
EBOK at Mon, 21 Oct 2024 13:08:54 UTC No. 16442482
Motion is what energy is for, so by your logic it's all about motion. Truly, all you truly exhibit is the knowledge that motion comes first and energy third, after weapon/shield.
Anonymous at Mon, 21 Oct 2024 14:24:14 UTC No. 16442578
>>16438110
Say we go down the sci-fi path of Stargate or Star Trek
We get magical amounts of near unlimited energy from some higher-dimensional mystical ZPE space-asshole
Then thermal energy isn't really a problem, is it?
We can just use more energy to concentrate the thermal energy in a reasonably small amount of mass and launch that shit into outer space
Boom - thermal energy removed from Earth
I call it the magical space-asshole thermal energy removal gun approach
Anonymous at Mon, 21 Oct 2024 14:26:30 UTC No. 16442580
>>16440849
meds, retard