Anonymous at Fri, 18 Oct 2024 22:53:25 UTC No. 16438805

>>16438751
>were the “dark” skinned Europeans actually dark skinned like the Ceddar man, or were they more like Middle Eastern brown?
Cheddar man was not dark skinned. If you read the original research, he's described as likely having olive skin (although it's hard to be sure since skin tone is a complex polygenic trait, so its phenotypic expression could still be significantly influenced by seemingly unrelated genes at other loci. But assuming that's true, then cheddar man would have been similar in complexion to modern middle eastern population. Moreover, that conclusion is independently corroborated by the fact that we know ancestral European populations' closest living relatives are populations living on the islands of the Mediterranean, particularly the Sardinians, who generally have an olive skin tone.

No where have I seen any evidence to indicate that cheddar man had a dark complexion comparable to sub-saharan africans, australian aborigines, or the the indigenous populations of the Indian subcontinent. I know /sci/ will just call me a poltard incel, but the reconstruction depicted in the media is a product of woke, anti-white ideology, not an accurate reconstruction of his appearance.

Anonymous at Sat, 19 Oct 2024 06:50:34 UTC No. 16439356

>>16438805
I should have said “Cheddar man reconstruction” because I agree

Anonymous at Sat, 19 Oct 2024 12:04:51 UTC No. 16439594

The cause is that rich jews are openly racist against ethnic europeans and wish to replace them with easy to control mutts who are generally brown skinned so they're attempting to claim europe should be brown to justify it.

All of the perversions around the science stem from this.