🧵 Books that everybody use but they are shit
Anonymous at Sat, 19 Oct 2024 22:26:35 UTC No. 16440395
6 at Sat, 19 Oct 2024 22:34:43 UTC No. 16440401
>>16440395
Hello kitty. Are you alive or dead?
Anonymous at Sat, 19 Oct 2024 22:55:37 UTC No. 16440422
>>16440401
Have you thoughts within your head?
Anonymous at Sat, 19 Oct 2024 23:03:13 UTC No. 16440427
>>16440401
>Are you alive or dead?
Y-yes.
Anonymous at Sat, 19 Oct 2024 23:24:08 UTC No. 16440445
>>16440395
>Jackson's EM
Absolutely garbage book. Only literal retards think otherwise.
Anonymous at Sun, 20 Oct 2024 00:13:31 UTC No. 16440503
>>16440395
wats wrong with it
>>16440445
wats wrong with it
Anonymous at Sun, 20 Oct 2024 00:20:12 UTC No. 16440507
>>16440395
is there better books to learn quantum as an undergraduate than griffths. ive been trying to go through it but he likes to keep all the important stuff behind the problems. wthell!
Anonymous at Sun, 20 Oct 2024 01:11:10 UTC No. 16440557
pain the physics of vibrations and waves
Anonymous at Sun, 20 Oct 2024 01:40:36 UTC No. 16440598
>>16440509
I'm literally doing notes on this textbook, it's the bomb once you understand what applications you might get out of it beforehand. I would buy the 4th edition if I had spare money, definitely better than anything in my shitshelf full of Rudin, shitty dovers and outdated books.
Anonymous at Sun, 20 Oct 2024 07:15:25 UTC No. 16440891
>>16440507
Landau-Lifschitz III.
Only burger retards think it's too hard for undergrads.
Anonymous at Sun, 20 Oct 2024 08:15:14 UTC No. 16440917
>>16440509
I've never really bothered to look into Axler's linear algebra book. His measure theory book is definitely mad alright but also misses a lot of core material in the subject you'd get in really any other standard book on the topic (like the Lebesgue equivalents of the fundamental theorem of calculus parts 1 and 2, as well as the introductory linear functional analysis that is standard to cover with L^p spaces).
Anonymous at Sun, 20 Oct 2024 09:43:39 UTC No. 16440962
> post cover of book
> do not elaborate at all about why it's supposedly shit
guys I need the details
Anonymous at Sun, 20 Oct 2024 09:55:41 UTC No. 16440968
>>16440401
>>16440427
I don't know if I'm a bad person, but these wet eyed cat pics always make me laugh :D
Anonymous at Sun, 20 Oct 2024 22:32:36 UTC No. 16441810
>>16440445
another mathlet filtered by that Chad of a book