Image not available

453x482

1690742924964526.png

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16440574

Are forever chemicals and microplastics turning the humans trans? I'm dead serious. We know they fuck up the reproductive system of basically every living animal known to man and screws up hormone regulation. Could this actually be why transness is becoming more common? Of course such people always existed and have become more common as society has become more accepting of it, but I dont think it accounts for all of it

Anonymous No. 16440615

>>16440574
being a fag or a tranny is mostly learned behavior

Anonymous No. 16440621

>>16440615
Okay then why are trans people increasing across the board even in super religious/conservative cultures? The chemicals in the water are fucking with our hormones

Image not available

680x697

trash-penn-fin.png

Anonymous No. 16440624

>>16440574
No, I think it is Lexan water bottles, receipts and benzone sunscreens. Plus a certain filtered legume that is not actually an onion.

Anonymous No. 16440686

>>16440574
Editing this into a frog made it less funny

Anonymous No. 16440689

>>16440574
No, porn addiction and normalizing degenerate behaviour is the main cause, notable victims are fatherless kids because there is noone to beat the faggot out of them

Anonymous No. 16440731

>>16440574
You’re getting knee jerk reactions but there’s actually research to suggest this is true. For example we know that children exposed to certain endocrine disrupting chemicals will not just be physically different (e.g. male children have smaller testes) but they actually develop different styles of play and different interests on average. Boys exposed to high levels of these chemicals are statistically more likely to have typically female interests in toys, reduced aggression, and so on.
It isn’t hard to imagine that this idea is basically correct and is at least a contributing factor to gender dysphoria.

Anonymous No. 16440745

>>16440689
Is this the message you want fathers to send their children? Beat off the gays?

Anonymous No. 16440752

>>16440731
How can females have a different interest in toys if it is a social construct?

Anonymous No. 16440754

>>16440752
It's obviously not, and I never said it was. The fact we can show that chemical exposure affects your interests means gendered interests can't be (purely) social constructs.

Anonymous No. 16441883

>>16440574
RFK suggested somerthing like this.

I don't think there is experimental evidence that PFAS exposure is causing gender dysphoria.However look at this:

"They found that two phthalates DEHP and DBP can affect play behaviour.

Boys exposed to high levels of these in the womb were less likely than other boys to play with cars, trains and guns or engage in "rougher" games like playfighting.

Elizabeth Salter-Green, director of the chemicals campaign group CHEM Trust, said the results were worrying.

"We now know that phthalates, to which we are all constantly exposed, are extremely worrying from a health perspective, leading to disruption of male reproduction health and, it appears, male behaviour too."

"This feminising capacity of phthalates makes them true 'gender benders'."

She acknowledged that the boys who have been studied were still young, but she said reduced masculine play at this age might lead to other feminised developments in later life."

Anonymous No. 16441887

>>16440752
They found out that monkeys have also different interests in toys, depending on their sex.

Frans de Waal writes about this in 'Different'