Image not available

1200x1320

Evolutions-evoli.jpg

๐Ÿงต Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16441709

population of brown bugs in placed in mostly green leafy environemtn. predators eat the brownest ones. those that r slightly lighter brown have an easier time hiding, and dont get eaten. they reproduce, and their offspring all have slight variation from their parents. those that are lighter brown will survive, reproduce, and some of the offspring will have some variation in color. the lightest ones or greenest ones will have the highest chance of survival, etc. eventually the whole population of bugs will become green.

if the color of a population of organisms can change over many generations, then any other characteristic could change too.

ive heard people say evolutin is not real. y is the above incorrect?

Anonymous No. 16441719

>>>/vp/

Anonymous No. 16443876

>>16441709
hi anon - this is an example of natural selection. natural selection is real, proven, undeniable - it is something that we can observe, like with your bug example, over a short period of time (like 5-10 years)

the reason why some people do not believe in evolution is because evolution takes hundreds of thousands of years in order for a population of organisms to differentiate so much that they become different species. because we cannot observe it (or really even perform experiments surrounding it because it would take so long), it is technically still a theory, although one that is heavily supported.

Anonymous No. 16443882

>>16443876
is it natural selection if the species gets stoned all the time and becomes slower and fatter? sometimes if the stone is more electrifying then the stoner gets faster and more agile, but those require speed

Anonymous No. 16444135

>>16441709
>Mentali
topkek

Anonymous No. 16444209

>>16443876
Theory means demonstrated to all knowledge we have, religious retard.
Plus, we've literally observed evolution in human lifetimes in bird populations undergoing speciation, and other creatures such as lizards becoming ring species.
Go back 20 years, and Ken Ham was denying natural selection or any changes in population at all, because your ideas are pure denialism rather than anything founded.
Wait until you hear about the germ theory of disease.