Image not available

4000x4000

large_wave_hittin....jpg

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16443588

> images can be expressed as an equation that defines the color of each pixel
> such equation can be compressed into a very small file size or even a single long number
> convert image of cp into equation, number
how would you stop this? you'd have to not only ban those numbers but also every way of expressing and converting them

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illegal_number

Anonymous No. 16444978

>>16443588
OP, you can just convert any binary file to a big number
128 bits in base 64 is only like 70 digits
your loophole does nothing new, and you will get v& as usual

Anonymous No. 16445443

>>16443588
>it’s all series and special functions
good look computing all that to required precision

Anonymous No. 16445446

>>16443588
You can just have any arbitary program generating it, or different format. Equations add nothing to the debate.

Anonymous No. 16446364

>>16443588
Word processors are just powerful calculators that perform complex mathematics on extremely large binary numbers.

Anonymous No. 16448430

>>16443588
Yes, you can create equations that can form images, but it isn't the real photograph. Many very advanced compression techniques already exist to reduce the size of images. I'm also sure that AI has been making a huge impact on image compression, but I haven't been following that topic.

This was interesting to me though, because it does touch on an interesting subject. Future image compression techniques could utilize mathematical modeling of subjects in an image. Not sure if those techniques are out there yet. Obviously AI can form its own internal "black box" mathematical models of subjects in an image, but it almost certainly won't be the most efficient way. I think William Gibson may have had this in mind in Neuromancer. He called them "holographic compression" techniques. Of course mathematical representations of objects in an image wouldn't be the real thing, but they could come very close.

Anonymous No. 16448431

>>16448430
And as for the CP question. You just need code analysis tools that evaluate the information in the code/equation. I'm sure the NSA has them.

Anonymous No. 16448449

>>16443588
But really that's the thing about the decimal system, all numbers can be expressed contextually as one another, realistically if you want this done perfectly the only thing we should ban is math.

Anonymous No. 16449694

>>16443588
This kind of shit is extremely useless. We have had 3D Graphics engines for almost 35-40 years at this point that bootstrap themselves with other software development kits to make models, animations, etcetera.

Even 2D rasterized graphics with sprites don't go through these types of mental gymnastics to render graphics on a screen.

Anonymous No. 16449714

>>16443588
This isn't effective. A machine can be designed for any sufficiently large number that would convert it to CP. And this is more in line with the type of work a glownigger is into as a matter of historical record.