Image not available

800x450

Books.jpg

๐Ÿงต Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16443786

Do you read books? It feels like they are a relic of the past and inefficient to gather useful information.

Anonymous No. 16443822

>>16443786
you must be 18+ to post, anon

Anonymous No. 16443829

>>16443786
Yeah. Most guys don't though.

Anonymous No. 16443855

>>16443786
That's funny, I feel the opposite way. With gen ai and seo bot spam clogging up every corner of the internet with garbage, books written over 5 years ago feel like a good source of genuine information.

Anonymous No. 16443856

>>16443786
Books have editors and quality control while the internet is just whatever people felt likenposting withno barrier to entry. The best of bothworlds, of course, is to use the internet to get recommendations for books and thenn pirate them

Anonymous No. 16443920

>>16443786
>inefficient
What is more efficient than reading?

Image not available

250x225

1721401632929057s.jpg

Anonymous No. 16444092

>>16443786
You've never done research or else you'd know what its like to work through a bunch of books and there is no better source of knowledge than that

Anonymous No. 16444740

it is better to read 1 book in a week, than 100 yt videos

Anonymous No. 16444753

>>16444092
>books
Real research is done through journals and patents. Unless you mean reference books, which nobody in their right mind just reads

Anonymous No. 16444814

>>16443786
>gather useful information
Reading books improves critical thinking on tons of different topics, and teaches you on how to communicate properly.
Anyone who doesnt read books is a fucking retard.

Anonymous No. 16445402

>>16443920
Tiktoks

Anonymous No. 16445415

>>16443920
chatGPT

Anonymous No. 16445427

>>16443920
Being told what to do by your guru

Anonymous No. 16445432

>>16443786
Books are much better than any other format you consume and it isn't even close.

Anonymous No. 16445451

>>16443786
Books are massively overrated desu. It's a relic of the past when books were the only way to learn new information but with the spread of internet they are becoming obsolete with each passing year.

Also after you read a good deal of non-fiction books you will soon find there is so much garbage written there you will have hard time putting them on pedestal like most people do.
Unironically, a Substack article or Wikipedia can be just as good sources of information as books

Anonymous No. 16445453

>>16445432
What makes them better?

Anonymous No. 16445463

>>16445453
You can compare and contrast across any medium, but there are some exceptions for activities. Back-flip theory won't give you the ability until you practice.
Books are better than classrooms by emanation principle: your teacher teaches from the book, the book doesn't teach from the classroom.
Books are better than pictures because they narrow down complexity and ambiguity. If a painting is to be taken as a serious comparison, then the language of the picture must be seriously considered. This leads to the complexity explosion - what icons are present, what do they mean, how are they to be interpreted, what are the colors and focus, context etc - these chain of things leave things open for interpretation and misinterpretation.
Ditto for videos.
Most people read faster than they listen and certainly faster than is spoken. A book can quickly be reviewed while even video scrubbing, convenient as it is, is less effective than flipping pages in a book.

Anonymous No. 16445467

>>16443786
i read study material, doujins, and romcom manga. physical books, no.