Anonymous at Thu, 24 Oct 2024 17:19:22 UTC No. 16447531

>>16447515
Yes and that's a good thing

Anonymous at Thu, 24 Oct 2024 17:23:52 UTC No. 16447540

I can't believe we just expect this shit to happen every time now.

Anonymous at Thu, 24 Oct 2024 17:31:58 UTC No. 16447556

>>16447515
If their cargo is interesting then they can be. Crew of example. Starlink mission #234628436843276872436823 is just routine now though.

🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 26 Oct 2024 00:55:31 UTC No. 16449826

>>16447515
Thats the punishment for being more reliable than a 737 flight. Starship launches will be relegated to the same status in a couple years

Anonymous at Sat, 26 Oct 2024 12:32:43 UTC No. 16450399

>>16447515
The first time seeing an F9 landing in 2016 got me basedjacking but now it bores me. Booster 13 landing on chopsticks was the closest thing to this feeling. Soon enough it'll bore me too. I wo der how Elon will up the ante once Starship landing and refuelling becomes routine?

Anonymous at Sat, 26 Oct 2024 12:34:43 UTC No. 16450405

>>16450399

Anonymous at Sat, 26 Oct 2024 15:50:47 UTC No. 16450824

I saw one rocket launch on a really dark night. It was pretty funny I thought I was alone on the beach but the rocket launch lit up the sky and there were people not expecting it doing "stuff" in the dark which was now daylight along with hundreds of other people who thought they were alone on the beach.

Anonymous at Sat, 26 Oct 2024 16:38:02 UTC No. 16450907

>>16450399
One word anon.
Mars.

Anonymous at Sat, 26 Oct 2024 19:50:01 UTC No. 16451131

>>16447515
>Are Falcon 9 launches too mundane to be interesting now?
If so, we should cancel all funding for competitors to SpaceX immediately since they won't even be interesting when they finally get to orbit the first time.

Anonymous at Sat, 26 Oct 2024 20:38:13 UTC No. 16451179

>>16450824
>doing "stuff" in the dark
imagine timing your nut to be right as the sonic boom reaches you