🧵 what is it?
Anonymous at Thu, 24 Oct 2024 19:03:15 UTC No. 16447701
Anonymous at Thu, 24 Oct 2024 19:07:22 UTC No. 16447704
>>16447701
bullshit
🗑️ Anonymous at Fri, 25 Oct 2024 15:51:28 UTC No. 16449108
>>16447701
black holes don't exist, they're as fictitious and made up as dark matter
Anonymous at Fri, 25 Oct 2024 15:52:57 UTC No. 16449110
>>16447701
>dark energy
the cosmological constant
>dark matter
we don’t know
Anonymous at Fri, 25 Oct 2024 16:08:57 UTC No. 16449128
Electromagnetic radiation of undetectably long wavelengths (aka gravity)
Next question
Anonymous at Fri, 25 Oct 2024 16:19:37 UTC No. 16449133
>>16447701
>our models for the physics of the universe don’t make sense
>theyre gonna cut our funding if we don’t give them an answer
>uhhh oh yeah forgot about this totally real thing we discovered that conveniently makes our models work here you go pls gib 10 million dollars
Anonymous at Fri, 25 Oct 2024 17:22:02 UTC No. 16449201
🗑️ Anonymous at Fri, 25 Oct 2024 17:23:15 UTC No. 16449202
Anonymous at Fri, 25 Oct 2024 17:27:30 UTC No. 16449211
>>16447701
>Implying we understand the observable matter
>Implying we can predict proton mass
>Implying we understand plasmas
>Implying
🗑️ EBOK at Fri, 25 Oct 2024 18:18:20 UTC No. 16449260
>>16449211>>16449202
>Implying the Jews were killed
>Implying it wasn't incursion
>Implying Holocaust denial law isn't a clue
>Implying that was Hitlers crime
Anonymous at Fri, 25 Oct 2024 19:23:24 UTC No. 16449387
>>16449211
What are you getting at? The proton mass can be calculated directly in lattice QCD.
Anonymous at Sat, 26 Oct 2024 00:07:13 UTC No. 16449754
>>16447701
Hypothesizing about something that's missing to salvage your theory after making wrong predictions is understandable when it's the best theory you have. But when another theory comes along that predicts things like galaxy rotation and universe expansion without any dark stuff, it's time to call bullshit on the first theory and move on. We now have that second theory in the form of Quantized Inertia, so the dark stuff is just cope for General Relativity being wrong.
🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 26 Oct 2024 23:22:56 UTC No. 16451372
>>16449754
theoretically, how big is a unicorn's penis?
Anonymous at Sun, 27 Oct 2024 02:54:16 UTC No. 16451605
>>16449387
Lol
Anonymous at Sun, 27 Oct 2024 08:36:44 UTC No. 16451893
>>16449754
Nope. QI does not predict anything new. QI basically copies the equations of MOND, which are 40 years old. So it didn't really provide anything new. And like MOND, QI is very limited. MOND works on the scale of galaxies, but on the larger scales of clusters of galaxies and cosmology it falls apart. The Bullet Cluster is a famous example where the gravitational lensing is offset from most of the normal matter, something unthinkable in radial models like MOND. QI does exactly the same thing. But McCulloch waves his hands and says something magical happens, but he does not provide any substantial argument or quantitative analysis of these systems.
It's "predictions" for dynamics have already been falsified, with wide binaries. People are still arguing about GR vs MOND, but QI is just way off.
https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2
https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2
And then when it comes to the actual cosmology, there is no quantitative model which describes expansion and the formation of structure. And there is glaring contradictions, in the fact that McCulloch uses some numbers from standard cosmology (e.g. the radius of the universe), which was calculated assuming dark matter and energy. So you see the very basic contradiction, that QI supposedly replaces these things and yet cannot calculate anything independently.
Anonymous at Sun, 27 Oct 2024 09:21:33 UTC No. 16451919
>>16447701
1. come up with a physical theory and equations
2. yey, we science now, we know everything, trust us
3. oh, it doesn't apply to anything we actually see in the galaxy and beyond?
4. fuck you, we KNOW better, let's keep the theory and fix the results by adding imaginary matter and energy that nobody can see
5. now it works perfectly fine and we, scientists, are right again
6. trust science
Anonymous at Mon, 28 Oct 2024 12:56:04 UTC No. 16453464
>>16451919
>you dont believe me
>i dont care give me billions in funding
>and you arent allowed to have political opinions that disagree
>yes our dingbat teachers get to program your children for decades
EBOK at Mon, 28 Oct 2024 13:15:07 UTC No. 16453482
>>16451919
Academic trained prey
Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 02:03:17 UTC No. 16454319
>cryptocurrency backed by dark matter
how much would it be worth?
Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 10:52:37 UTC No. 16454652
>>16449260
>Implying that millions more european Christians than the Nazi regimes “sworn enemies” didn’t die
>Implying that Hitler didn’t gladly take funding in exchange for letting certain families off the hook
>Implying German culture isn’t obsessed with micromanaging reality itself, as thousands of years of history have told us
>Implying this is the right board.
Anonymous at Wed, 30 Oct 2024 02:11:08 UTC No. 16455482
>>16454652
>I hate Hitler because he didn't kill all the jews, too many got away
based
Anonymous at Thu, 31 Oct 2024 03:29:06 UTC No. 16456619
>>16454319
You could buy a lot of NFTs with that kind of money
Anonymous at Fri, 1 Nov 2024 00:42:16 UTC No. 16457602
oh hey it's this thread again
Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 03:16:55 UTC No. 16459244
>>16449260
Hitler converted the jews to dark matter and thats why nobody can find any evidence of any of the 6,000,000 dead bodies
Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 03:51:22 UTC No. 16460492
>>16459244
>nazi superscience
operation paperclip kidnapped the wrong guys. rockets are pretty neat-o, but nothing compared to dark matter
Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 04:13:43 UTC No. 16460506
>>16447701
It's non baryonic matter. That's all. We're just used to everything being made out of baryons. So we found something in the universe not made of baryons and it doesn't fit any of our models. That's all.
Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 21:05:13 UTC No. 16462661
>>16461620
this except the yellow part is also blatantly and badly misunderstood
Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 21:20:38 UTC No. 16462690
>>16447701
dark matter could be the sort of the same concept as a wave function before the collapse.
Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 21:26:05 UTC No. 16462702
>fake
>wrong
all those retarded posts in here are cringe. and at least 70% is posted by /pol/tards.
you all act as you would understand this but you are just little childs playing around.
watched 20 min of a popsci docu on youtube and now act like you would be experts.
it took me literally years of reading books to get a glimpse of it.
you act as if science is not aware of the inexplicability or as if scientists would not consider that it is not matter/energy.
admit to yourselves that your passion, your willingness to work and your brains are simply not enough.
Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 16:56:35 UTC No. 16463778
>>16462702
I find it interesting that dark matter cultists are 1:1 with globists. Just tell people how it is. Don't ask questions; we know more than you. That's Science, right? That's how your Science works?
Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 17:59:26 UTC No. 16463854
>>16463778
sorry I dont speak offended clown.
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Nov 2024 04:06:29 UTC No. 16465701
>>16462702
you've never studied astronomy even to the point of passing astro 101, you have no idea what you're talking about and you're projecting your ignorance onto everyone else because you presume that everyone is as ignorant as you are.
there is a plethora of professional astronomers who are convinced dark matter is a work of fiction including almost everyone in the references of this paper
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Nov 2024 08:30:28 UTC No. 16465859
>>16465701
>>16465701
That paper is nonsense, dark matter has many pillars within observations: Rotation curves, galaxy clusters, weak lensing, the cosmic microwave background fluctuations, big bang nucleosynthesis, galaxy formation... Gupta doesn't show he can explain any of that. Instead he is looking at a single dataset (baryon acoustic oscillations) and showing that in his model he doesn't need DM, but his model cannot explain all the other things I listed. The power of standard cosmology is it's ability to fit all current data simultaneously, Gupta is looking at the data one plot at a time.
Secondly, it's not removing the need for assumptions like DM, it's just adding different ones. Instead of having dark matter he adds both time varying cosmological constants and some magical tired light model, each of which is a dark matter sized assumption. So wow, he has removed one model parameter by adding two more, this is not a simplification.
Gupta's papers are lazy and uninteresting. And his model of having the physical constants vary with time is already ruled out by lunar ranging.
https://astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosm
> including almost everyone in the references of this paper
Lol no, that's not how references work. Look up some of the random papers he cited, you will see few even mention DM. There are people who work on models without dark matter (e.g. MOND), but these models are not simpler and they all have big problems matching observations. Modifying gravity or dynamics is no simpler or better than having it be a particle.
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Nov 2024 09:52:52 UTC No. 16465886
>>16449754
> so the dark stuff is just cope for General Relativity being wrong
All theories are wrong. Whatever replaces General Relativity will also be wrong. Just less wrong.
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Nov 2024 12:33:40 UTC No. 16465931
>>16465859
I found a dark matter particle, it exactly matches prediction, it is confirmed, the appropriate mass, charge, spin, size. It was very hard to detect but me and my team did it in our schools collider. We have already been corroborated by major journals and publications, so it will be quite soon the data and news is made. In your estimate, where does the science go from there, now what?
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Nov 2024 14:08:08 UTC No. 16465999
Dark matter deniers when I show them a window.
Anyways dark matter really is just a way to measure our error from prediction to measurement. Why do you give a shit?
Anonymous at Sat, 9 Nov 2024 04:48:47 UTC No. 16467980
>>16465859
>https://astro.ucla.edu
dude makes $70k/year
thats less than what a bud driver makes
Anonymous at Sat, 9 Nov 2024 12:57:31 UTC No. 16468236
>>16465931
Is it an axion? Or something else? Anyways, do you have an expected publishing date, that does sound interesting if you are not larping.
Anonymous at Sat, 9 Nov 2024 15:36:30 UTC No. 16468341
>>16461620
lol
Anonymous at Sun, 10 Nov 2024 10:34:34 UTC No. 16469466
Anonymous at Sun, 10 Nov 2024 14:41:07 UTC No. 16469626
They just couldn't accept fact, that constants and laws of physics are local, and particles a little bit divergent across universe, so they blamed niggers and we have dark energy now.
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Nov 2024 02:31:48 UTC No. 16471545
🗑️ Anonymous at Wed, 13 Nov 2024 01:24:40 UTC No. 16472674
>>16471545
lol
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Nov 2024 02:37:30 UTC No. 16474242
>>16467980
Bus drivers are more useful and valuable people than astronomers. Higher IQ too
Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 02:56:03 UTC No. 16475580
>>16449110
>the cosmological constant
even einstein wasn't stupid enough to believe in it
Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 19:52:48 UTC No. 16476695
>>16475580
einstein was shit at math, thats why he wasn't able to construct functional mathematical formulas to express his ideas.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 00:39:18 UTC No. 16478395
>>16455482
Hitler didn't kill any of them, thats the worst thing about him
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 07:00:15 UTC No. 16478661
>>16447704
Kek. Timeless
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 07:04:16 UTC No. 16478665
>>16465859
>The power of standard cosmology is it's ability to fit all current data simultaneously
ie Garbage in garbage out
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 12:47:59 UTC No. 16478895
>>16447701
>matter had anti-matter just because it does
>energy doesn't have anti-energy (not an energy sink, but something that attracts energy itself)
>can't see anti energy because all of your high energy or low energy experiments are looking for energy signatures