๐งต plants and animals have same origin
Anonymous at Sat, 26 Oct 2024 05:54:39 UTC No. 16450106
heres an idea: animals did not evolve to mimic plants (some primitive animals are very plant like in behaviour even if they have nerves they pretend to be plants) but plants and animals came from the same MULTICELLULAR ancestor
not single celled
multicellularity evolved twice: one is mushroom kingdom and second is animals + plants
plants evolved from first multicellular animals
why does plants have different mitochondria then? because an plant like animal ate some single celled creatures that became its power source
then he omitted his animal mitochondria completely and became solely relying on the new photosynthetic mitochondria taken from a creature resembling modern volvox
this happened in an ocean and it happened 700 million years ago
higher developed plants make branches just like primite plant like branching animals who doesnt have a well formed body plan
we need to stop comparing mitochondrial genes together and start a project of investigating non mitochondria DNA of plants and comparing it to non mitochondrial DNA of most primitive animals
Anonymous at Sat, 26 Oct 2024 07:20:57 UTC No. 16450156
>>16450106
the mushroom is god and the plants created humans in order to worship their god with fertilizer. mystery solved.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=R3pfs
Anonymous at Sat, 26 Oct 2024 22:44:28 UTC No. 16451338
>>16450106
And then?
Anonymous at Sun, 27 Oct 2024 05:45:50 UTC No. 16451779
>>16451338
scientists (tm) claim that plants and animals have entirely different origin
1) first animals are born from single celled ancestors who invent multicellularity
2) first plants are born likewise, from different ancestors unrelated to animal ancestors and invent multicellularity on their own
yet somehow magically both plants and animals create exactly same branched tree shapes (fungi does not do this)
Anonymous at Sun, 27 Oct 2024 15:06:33 UTC No. 16452254
>>16451779
>yet somehow magically both plants
And both utilize the DNA system at all right?
Is it thought that the first life, first cells, first DNA or whatever, developed in precisely one location of Earth?
Or possibly a cell developed on one side of the globe and a different but similar on another side?
All cells are related to the first cells? All DNA related to the first DNA?