Image not available

640x514

menhera-chan.gif

🧵 Why are trannies so overrepresented in category theory?

Anonymous No. 16450296

Anonymous No. 16450344

>>16450296
Trannies are SU(2), the rrason why they are overrepresented is because SU(2) is a double cover of SO(3), so they have two groups after them

Anonymous No. 16450415

>>16450296
Category theory is basically algebra algebra and trannies are obsessed with algebra because they are schizos who think that they are uncovering philosophical truth and disdain set theory and regular math because it isn’t universal enough. Basically if you understand why Platonism is for faggots and Aristotelianism is for normal people you will understand why they are obsessed with category theory. They look down on real mathematical problems because they’re about specific objects that are actually interesting rather than meaningless abstractions about objects.

Anonymous No. 16450652

>>16450296
They think Yoneda's lemma validates their gender identity, when it actually shows that they will never be real women.

Anonymous No. 16450906

>>16450296
high iq

Anonymous No. 16451045

>>16450906
The IQ requirement for category theory is not very high, try PDEs instead (tranny-free zone).

Anonymous No. 16451073

>>16451045
>le PDEs
>either analytic solutions using, surprise surprise, group theory (see Miller's Symmetry and Separation of Variables)
>or non-linear PDEs where numerical methods are now getting supplanted by niggerlicious AI "models"

Anonymous No. 16451132

>>16450415
valuable post

Anonymous No. 16453139

>>16450415
Valuable post, I can say this has been good reasoning as to my own interest in it. However, I do slightly disagree with you calling me a schizo because abstract algebra (group theory) is strongly implicated in physics. I'm also looking into homotopy type theory for similar reasons.

Image not available

259x224

1727501594053489.png

Anonymous No. 16453173

>>16450415
>>16450652

Anonymous No. 16453360

>>16450296
>be obsessed with categorizing your sexuality/gender
>develop instinctual category theory because sex is one of the main motivators of the human species.

As below, so above.

Anonymous No. 16454394

>>16453360
How about intuitionistic category theory, because it's real in their minds?

Anonymous No. 16454447

Pretty strange that a category theorist can make the exact same breakthrough almost a year after its already been made without ever showing any work in that specific area or even any knowledge of that perticular field. Pretty strange to be honest.

Anonymous No. 16454740

>>16450296
Liking category theory and troonism are both strong predictors of severe autism.

Anonymous No. 16455020

>>16450296

If they understand what a category is they will be able to manipulate the category they were born in.

Anonymous No. 16455706

>>16455020
Is transitioning a homomorphism? Is it injective? Is it surjective?

Anonymous No. 16455976

>>16453173
That's just your incision leaking fecal matter again

🗑️ Anonymous No. 16455978

>>16455706
It’s not even a function because women wear more clothes than men so you can’t get all the women clothes by transforming male clothes

Anonymous No. 16457223

>>16450296
because they are obnoxious and want to be overrepresented everywhere

Anonymous No. 16457300

>>16457223
The personality type "obnoxious and has a need for attention" is the worst part of any group. They are overrepresented by definition. Sociological research tries to get a representative sample of the entire population, but - as simple as it sounds - you interact with the people who interact with you. The top 10% who make their problems everyone else's problems are the ones who ruin everything for everyone else because it's simply their nature to exploit the hierarchy of attention to satisfy their natural needs.

Anonymous No. 16457351

>>16457223
this isn't the reason though
the replies above offer much better reasons