Anonymous at Sat, 26 Oct 2024 20:58:42 UTC No. 16451220

>>16451210
Looks like it

Anonymous at Sat, 26 Oct 2024 21:02:53 UTC No. 16451224

>>16451210
How badly do the real-number zombie cretins have to be seething about his opinions to hack in and do the your-speech-is-hate-speech thing to a guy making math videos?

Anonymous at Sat, 26 Oct 2024 23:58:58 UTC No. 16451399

>>16451220
lmao I was joking, damn.

Anonymous at Sun, 27 Oct 2024 00:41:52 UTC No. 16451443

>>16451399
Indeed, for the meantime have this musical edit so the hackers know that ideas are bulletproof and his legacy continues,
https://odysee.com/@musicam-geometria-utebantur:6/wildberger-edit-v1:4

Indeed,

Anonymous at Sun, 27 Oct 2024 03:44:30 UTC No. 16451657

>>16451210
why hack some random math schizo just to remove obviously wrong mathematics?

Anonymous at Sun, 27 Oct 2024 03:46:39 UTC No. 16451658

>>16451210
>>16451220

Wait, so did some internet schizos hack this other internet schizo for some reason, or is this also schizophrenic nonsense and he just deleted the stuff himself?

Anonymous at Sun, 27 Oct 2024 06:31:50 UTC No. 16451824

>>16451658
yes

Anonymous at Sun, 27 Oct 2024 09:13:01 UTC No. 16451907

holy shit the ZFC gang will need to be punished for this

Cult of Passion at Sun, 27 Oct 2024 09:32:06 UTC No. 16451924

>>16451210
Thats what he gets for rejecting my offer to a steak dinner.

Anonymous at Sun, 27 Oct 2024 12:08:41 UTC No. 16452008

>>16451657
>random math schizo
I believe in constructivism, so I don't agree with him on everything. But if we all switched to wildberger's math it would be an improvement.

Anonymous at Sun, 27 Oct 2024 12:17:33 UTC No. 16452017

>>16451658
He may be wrong and say stupid stuff sometimes but I've seen no indication whatsoever that he's psychotic or has schizophrenia.

Anonymous at Sun, 27 Oct 2024 12:46:38 UTC No. 16452048

>>16452017
Yeah, I don't get why people call him a schizo. You can accuse him of being too reductive, but he technically hasn't proved anything that is invalid from comtemporary mathematics. If anything he's an anti-schizo, he's the redneck of mathematics if you will.

Anonymous at Sun, 27 Oct 2024 13:36:25 UTC No. 16452130

>>16452048
>I don't get why people call him a schizo
They simply are not yet ready to be unplugged from the real number delusion neo

Anonymous at Sun, 27 Oct 2024 13:47:04 UTC No. 16452156

>>16452017
>>16452048
Anyone who claims that infinite sets are incoherent while also constructing based on the rationals (which are countably infinite) has, at minimum, some cognitive dissonance to deal with.

Anonymous at Sun, 27 Oct 2024 13:47:10 UTC No. 16452157

>>16451657
>obviously wrong
>Not PROVABLY wrong or I would have brought proof.
>Just obviously. Trust me.

Anonymous at Mon, 28 Oct 2024 18:38:40 UTC No. 16453848

>>16452156
A rational number is not "countably infinite", the set containing all rational numbers is. Wildberger does not refer to any such set so what is "incoherent" here? And no, don't say
>well, actually, a rational number is a countably infinite equivalence class of ...
No, no, good heavens, no. A rational number is a pair of an arbitrary integer and a positive integer, whether two given rationals are the same is decided by a simple finite computational procedure.

Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 14:45:19 UTC No. 16454796

>>16453848
Damn, this unironically changed my perspective

Anonymous at Wed, 30 Oct 2024 15:15:16 UTC No. 16455883

>>16453848
Some irrational numbers are not countably infinite either. Square root of two is given by a (finite) Turing machine giving it to arbitrary precision. Doesn't stop wilberger from being butthurt about it.

Barkon at Wed, 30 Oct 2024 15:17:35 UTC No. 16455884

fags

Anonymous at Wed, 30 Oct 2024 17:33:42 UTC No. 16456035

>>16455883
Present me your finite Turing machine computing this square root of two to exact precision.

Anonymous at Wed, 30 Oct 2024 18:23:39 UTC No. 16456077

This is all fake. He just got his bonkers clonked because some autost on /sci/ proved his whole construction wrong and he rage-quit YouTube.

Anonymous at Wed, 30 Oct 2024 18:38:32 UTC No. 16456105

>>16455883
> Square root of two is given by a (finite) Turing machine giving it to arbitrary precision.
>(finite)
nigga WHAT

Anonymous at Thu, 31 Oct 2024 17:24:52 UTC No. 16457193

>>16451210
yeah

Anonymous at Thu, 31 Oct 2024 17:33:46 UTC No. 16457205

>>16456105
The finite Turing machine takes a given precision (you input 0.00001) I output the square root of two within +- 0.0001 in finite time.
>>16456035
Choose any of the well known algorithms, Newton method works fine here.

Anonymous at Thu, 31 Oct 2024 17:44:23 UTC No. 16457215

>>16457205
Bonus point: quantifier elimination algorithms in the real closed fields decide questions about certain real numbers (including the square root of 2) to exact precision.

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 12:45:26 UTC No. 16459582

Bumping this thread until the videos retvrn

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 19:35:17 UTC No. 16459938

>>16459582
Do you really think the woke snowflakes at YouTube care even slightly about this guy getting hacked?
He's going to have to start over on Rumble.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 02:08:37 UTC No. 16460424

>>16459938
Their reverse repo'd with the feds primary dealers, they dont even need to peddle smut to survive, the least they can do is hoist his archive, surely its already parsed in their internal AIs, you dont throw something like that out

Besides every programmer is better off on wildburger than the infinite reals

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 16:46:36 UTC No. 16462327

Bumperion prime

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 17:12:47 UTC No. 16462357

>>16452157
Proofs depend on a set of axioms. Wildberger rejects the axioms.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 17:43:25 UTC No. 16462398

>>16460424
>424
I checked those numbers