🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sun, 27 Oct 2024 03:41:49 UTC No. 16451650
What are the societal implications of IQ being the biggest factor determining the success of a group
Stop guessing start learning at Sun, 27 Oct 2024 04:46:23 UTC No. 16451722
>>16451650
>IQ being the biggest factor determining the success of a group
It doesn't. grow up
Anonymous at Sun, 27 Oct 2024 05:26:19 UTC No. 16451765
>>16451650
You will see it with your own eyes very soon, if you are not vaporized by nukes.
Anonymous at Mon, 28 Oct 2024 05:17:19 UTC No. 16453217
>>16451722
Cope
Anonymous at Mon, 28 Oct 2024 06:05:59 UTC No. 16453247
>>16451650
Depends on context and the definition of "success". Being hot with big booba can be worth 30 IQ points in an environment dominated by men, and negative 30 IQ points in an environment dominated by women. Where trannies are in charge your value can swing by a hundred points based on your skin color and what makes your pp hard.
Anonymous at Mon, 28 Oct 2024 06:11:19 UTC No. 16453251
>>16451650
Very little, that report was done in 1992. It's 32 years in the future, your average smartphone is probably working with better technology than that system and with a.i. assistance too.
What do you suppose is being used now by said defense system if your average midwit is walking around with a portable borderline super computer in their pocket?
Anonymous at Mon, 28 Oct 2024 06:17:17 UTC No. 16453258
>>16453251
Getting hired to be the monkey pushing a button to do something automated that requires zero input or skill on your part isn't "success".
Anonymous at Mon, 28 Oct 2024 06:37:27 UTC No. 16453281
>>16453258
That's the point, hence "very little" was used to describe the situation for op.
The success part is being less reliant on spending 18 or so years educating/ training a fleshlings to do a job done by a computer made and assembled in a few days.
Anonymous at Mon, 28 Oct 2024 06:43:13 UTC No. 16453285
>>16453281
And who's going to maintain and update those computers as people get gradually stupider?
Anonymous at Mon, 28 Oct 2024 06:51:22 UTC No. 16453287
Anonymous at Mon, 28 Oct 2024 07:05:35 UTC No. 16453292
>>16451650
It's obviously not because east Asians are according to most agreement higher IQ than western Europeans, but western Europeans produce vastly more pleasant, industrious and innovative societies than those of east Asia.
>Inb4 muh conolizer
Great job disputing yourself moron.
>inb4 muh scientific papers
Great, where's the innovation thought? The vast majority of actual IP is European or American, as is the overwhelming majority of major companies and real innovation. None of those 'papers' seem to be worth the paper they're printed on.
Anonymous at Mon, 28 Oct 2024 07:14:56 UTC No. 16453300
>>16451650
You can study for the ASVAB a LOT easier than you can study for an IQ test.
Anonymous at Mon, 28 Oct 2024 07:16:29 UTC No. 16453303
>>16453292
Actually, Jewish people and homosexuals in Europe created all those things.
>t. knower
Anonymous at Mon, 28 Oct 2024 07:34:25 UTC No. 16453311
>>16453303
(1/2)
>Jews
First of all, no they didn't and the suggestion is laughable. You'd have to completely ignore the entirety of innovation in Europe, Britain and the United states that predates the 1850's, and even afterward the suggestion that Jews were singularly responsible is also stupid and untrue. Jews in the 20th century were certainly a very talented group, but one fundamentally within the bounds of and informed by broader European culture and its people. The vast majority of the types of Jews that I'm sure you'd point to, I will point out were generally from integrated, or mixed German/English Ashkenazi families. Also from what were middle to upper middle class, bourgeois families that had mostly abandoned Jewishness at least in any religious sense. For examples, you could look at Einstein or Richard Feynman. It was certainly not Jews living on the wasteland Russian shtetl and reciting Torah 12 times a day that pioneered 20th century Physics, but thoroughly Europeanized Jews. If you look into this with any sincerity you'll find its the case with most of the Jewish intelligensia.
Anonymous at Mon, 28 Oct 2024 07:35:26 UTC No. 16453312
>>16453303
>>16453311
(2/2)
The second point I'll make regarding this is people tend to keep a remarkably generous criterium when designating Jewishness. Is a person with one Jewish parent, and one German parent Jewish or German? If they're not in the slightest bit religiously Jewish would you still consider them a Jew? How about a Jewish grandparent? Great grandparent? By and large the genetic studies confirm the supposed distinct ethnic component of Jewishness to be a mirage, them being by and large genetically European. If we can't even draw back to a religious justification, then what is the basis on which we form a criterium for counting? I personally know multiple people of such mixed background, yet I have no doubt if they did anything worth remembering, the reporting pundits would be sure to highlight the ephemeral Jewishness. If I used the same criterium on the Irish I'd probably just as easily find that the Irish were also overwhelmingly represented in significant innovation.
>homosexuals
possibly.
raphael at Mon, 28 Oct 2024 08:14:38 UTC No. 16453334
>>16453300
then why is the g loading .8+ dumbass
Anonymous at Mon, 28 Oct 2024 08:54:06 UTC No. 16453353
>>16451650
k-selection and non-abusive parents.
Anonymous at Mon, 28 Oct 2024 10:08:01 UTC No. 16453394
>>16453303
>Jewish people and homosexuals
Jewish culture highly values in-group nepotism which gives them more opportunities to succeed resulting in them being over-representated in the data.
High IQ homos are just straight guys who hate women that past a certain age have to pick a side.
Anonymous at Mon, 28 Oct 2024 12:53:09 UTC No. 16453463
>>16453312
One drop rule. Because of some inheritance features, it takes approximately 30 - 33 generations for the curse to leave the family line, assuming no further dabbling in the dark arts.
Anonymous at Mon, 28 Oct 2024 18:25:55 UTC No. 16453839
>>16453463
You know nothing faggot. After 33 Generations there is very literally next to zero DNA that you actually inherit from your ancestor. Even further than great grandparents, you actually inherit very little DNA.
Anonymous at Mon, 28 Oct 2024 18:55:09 UTC No. 16453867
>>16451650
>What are the societal implications of IQ being the biggest factor determining the success of a group
For one thing, it makes low-IQ people deny that IQ is real and important.
Anonymous at Mon, 28 Oct 2024 19:02:22 UTC No. 16453876
>>16453867
nah the low iq are okay, they know they're dumb it's the subsection of midwits with grand ambitions that are the problem
Anonymous at Mon, 28 Oct 2024 22:09:55 UTC No. 16454071
>>16453839
And now you understand the one drop rule.