Cult of Passion at Sun, 27 Oct 2024 08:45:22 UTC No. 16451897

>>16451829
Otherway around, you think like a solipsistic, atomized, autistically literal, pseudo-fact-pro-measure, hueman-mortal.

Dawkins confuses what he measures for with what (ultimately) is (and could be).

Cult of Passion at Sun, 27 Oct 2024 08:48:29 UTC No. 16451898

>>16451829
>Baldwin effect
Thats Dawkins, he cannot discern instinctual perceptions due to his arbitrary, huemanistic, worldview (he thinks like a 5th century fundementalist Christian where only huemans have souls).

Dawkins is a Spontaneous Creationist LARPing a Biologist thats actually just a Chemist. LAPRs on top of LARPs on top of LARPs....

Anonymous at Sun, 27 Oct 2024 09:06:28 UTC No. 16451904

I used to joke about a what if scenario where Dawkins somehow ends up the archbishop of canterbury.
But every year Dawkins shifts the probability higher.
At least he'd better better than welby