🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sun, 27 Oct 2024 20:21:44 UTC No. 16452703
a circle represents infinity, the spirit
matter is tangible, a square
if the amount of sides of a polygon goes to infinity, then the interior angle goes to 179.999...° = 180° , making it a flat line, or a circle.
matter into spirit, spirit into matter
Anonymous at Sun, 27 Oct 2024 20:56:35 UTC No. 16452765
>>16452703
How do you account for the cylinder?
Anonymous at Sun, 27 Oct 2024 21:05:06 UTC No. 16452777
>>16452765
a cylinder is a circle extruded in the z axis, if it goes to infinity you get another infinite line
EBOK at Mon, 28 Oct 2024 12:17:04 UTC No. 16453443
>>16453442
A circle doesn't represent infinity, it represents one full round.
Anonymous at Mon, 28 Oct 2024 12:30:07 UTC No. 16453449
>>16453443
a circle has no beginning or end, representing continuity and eternal cycles. it is defined by pi an number that goes on indefinitely and never repeats itself
Cult of Passion at Mon, 28 Oct 2024 14:00:56 UTC No. 16453530
72(0)? In a Hexagon? In this Dimension of reality?
>>16452703
Wait to you figure out "360°" is a Phi based number system...
Anonymous at Mon, 28 Oct 2024 15:02:26 UTC No. 16453584
>>16453530
i thought it's dodecahedron based since 12*5, and 5 in shape of a pentagram contains phi all over
Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 07:26:18 UTC No. 16454544
>>16453530
well why is it?
Cult of Passion at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 09:19:25 UTC No. 16454610
>>16453584
>>16454544
What "shape" is Phi? And why use a 2.5-Dimensional object? Why not a torus, a 3-Dimensional projection of Phi?
The Square already comes out to 360°...youre adding complexity and Dimensionality to something thats already beed reduced.
Cult of Passion at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 09:24:20 UTC No. 16454613
>>16453584
>>16454544
1.618[...] is linear Dimensionality. Irreducible. How "high" can it go?
Is there a limit?
Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 09:48:43 UTC No. 16454619
>>16454610
But where are you getting the 360 from?
Cult of Passion at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 10:03:49 UTC No. 16454621
>>16454619
[tiresome sigh]
Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 13:11:02 UTC No. 16454711
>>16454621
you first have to define what measure an angle has, no? we are using base 60, a full circle has 360, a hexagon 720 based on this system, but where are you getting it from?
Cult of Passion at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 14:21:27 UTC No. 16454770
>>16454711
>we are using base 60
I am using base-36.
>full circle has 360
36(0), or...1. Magnitude is dropped, 1-ten, 1-hundred, 1-thousand.
>but where are you getting it from?
The minimal measure needed to form a Pentagram, divided into three possible measures for its construction, 36, 72, 108. Pentagons interior angles divided by 3 is 180, a line, to which an "angle" can be created.
2-Dimensional shapes are extrapolate linear projections of their correlating numbered sides. 5 sides is the number 5 in 2-Dimensions. A dodecahedron in 2.5, and torus in 3.
>you first have to define what measure an angle has, no?
No. Whats an "angle"?
Cult of Passion at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 14:31:11 UTC No. 16454779
>>16454621
The square root of Phi (1.6180339887…) = 1.2720196495…
4 divided by 1.2720196495… = 3.14460551103…
>>16454770
>Pentagons interior angles divided by 3 is 180
I was looking at this and thinking "Pi".
Whats a "number"?
Cult of Passion at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 15:05:12 UTC No. 16454806
27.3% more area square.
27.3% greater than edge circle.
Numerations are (almost) abitrary and only have coherent meaning within themselves, that is why Pi, √2, Phi, etc, are actually 1 (in their native base-system).
Under certain conditions they align, but will go back into arbitrary measures otherwise. I am trying to look for, and use, the aligments as a base-system, and not force everything into the one.
Cult of Passion at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 15:07:47 UTC No. 16454807
>>16454806
Are you using Physical reality as a base-system, or an arbitrary numeration for ease of universal application (even when it no long has significant relevence)?
EBOK at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 15:12:11 UTC No. 16454808
>>16454807
Cult of Fag.
We HEAR you, sir
Cult of Passion at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 15:14:02 UTC No. 16454811
>>16454808
>HEAR
But do you SEE?
Cult of Passion at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 15:19:54 UTC No. 16454818
>>16454811
This is correlated to "Standard Units of Measure" and where they come from.
Where foot, mile, meter, etc, are derived.
√153 equalling the number of moons in a year. Time, calendars, units...numeration.
Lunar and solar calendars being a major change in hueman perceptions of SpaceTime.
Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 19:33:46 UTC No. 16455128
>>16454779
>The square root of Phi (1.6180339887…) = 1.2720196495…
>4 divided by 1.2720196495… = 3.14460551103…
that's cool
when you take the side length of the base of the great pyramid and divide it by its height you get
440 / 280 = 1,571428571428 or ~ Pi / 2
if you take the area of the 4 triangles and divide it by the area of the base you get
313359,09 / 193600 = 1,61859034 ~ Phi
Cult of Passion at Wed, 30 Oct 2024 11:11:08 UTC No. 16455750
>>16455128
>440 / 280
Division is just proportioning.
https://sacred.numbersciences.org/2
>The English and Greek Foot 1 = 1.000000 ft Defined from the Equator of the Earth as one 360,000th of a DAY
Huh...360.
We also have Pi and Earth Measure (Geo-Metric), other parts speak of musical (Atmospheric) harmonics, all correlating together to form Uni-Versal Number Theory.
Anonymous at Thu, 31 Oct 2024 18:20:50 UTC No. 16457262
>>16455750
>Division is just proportioning.
then why change it
Cult of Passion at Thu, 31 Oct 2024 18:49:08 UTC No. 16457286
>>16457262
>change it
You mean "Why convert it into base-10?"
Cult of Passion at Thu, 31 Oct 2024 18:51:39 UTC No. 16457287
>>16457286
>base-10
Well, "decimal system" but dec=10, and all hueman base-systems are resolved as base-10.
Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 13:47:11 UTC No. 16459619
>>16457287
man is the measure of all things
- protagoras