🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Mon, 28 Oct 2024 20:17:07 UTC No. 16453942
I can't believe we'll see a man land on the moon within 2 months. How will NASA do it?
Anonymous at Mon, 28 Oct 2024 20:41:04 UTC No. 16453969
>>16453942
It will be AI generated with no stars in the background soiboi starwars fans will gape their mouths and point no matter how cheesy it looks.
Anonymous at Mon, 28 Oct 2024 20:48:24 UTC No. 16453979
>>16453969
You know it's real because of how fake it looks. If it were fake they'd make it look real.
Anonymous at Mon, 28 Oct 2024 20:52:08 UTC No. 16453982
>>16453979
When I see it...
Will I know it's gay by how straight it looks as well?
Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 00:54:17 UTC No. 16454251
I have grown to hate space exploration because of how much s0i it attracts
Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 00:58:54 UTC No. 16454255
>>16453969
>no stars in the background
Disingenuous or retarded
Stop guessing start learning at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 01:18:46 UTC No. 16454270
>>16453942
You won't but it's nice to dream I guess
Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 01:19:59 UTC No. 16454271
more like 2 centuries
Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 04:23:09 UTC No. 16454435
Bezos too a massive lurch rightward and admitted that everything in his newspaper is fake. That of course includes all of the the outlandish claims by NASA that he publishes.
If he can get BO to drop the DEI and compete on even terms with SpaceX then the level of competition is going to generate some really nifty space travel. Of course Musk has a massive head start because he isn't gay
Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 13:15:16 UTC No. 16454714
>>16454255
Let's see stars from the moon please.
Just once.
Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 13:37:59 UTC No. 16454726
>>16454714
http://onebigmonkey.com/apollo/star
Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 13:41:27 UTC No. 16454728
>>16454714
It's impossible to have stars and moon surface in one picture, anon. At least during the day. On night time they can use a flashlight to illuminate the moon surface and take picture which will show the stars. But I doubt they'll be landing or going on the "dark side" of the Moon.
Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 13:42:00 UTC No. 16454731
>>16454726
topkek
>a fat urban man coping
Imagine the big swinging dick you'd have if you had been on the moon.
Now look at those three men and tell me if they were on the moon or if they are lying entirely.
Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 13:43:01 UTC No. 16454733
>>16454728
I know, I know. The moon never faces the other way and never has any way to prove that they were on it.
We've been through this many times.
Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 13:47:03 UTC No. 16454735
>>16454733
How does a picture with Moon surface and stars proves they were on it?
Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 13:48:35 UTC No. 16454738
>>16454735
It doesn't. Reread what I said.
We all have to accept that there is no proof that any of it happened and we all have to disregard all common sense in regards to the lack of this proof.
Just open your mouth VERY WIDE when Elon's video comes out. And then point at the screen so that your wife and the guy fucking her will pay attention.
Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 13:51:37 UTC No. 16454741
>>16454738
Common sense? Whats your common sense based on?
Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 13:54:54 UTC No. 16454744
>>16454741
>we lost all the original data
>nothing was up there
>no reason to go back
>retarded looking video
>videos of them literally faking shots from low orbit
Look.
There are two possibilities.
They went and faked a ton of shit for public consumption and in reality we have moon bases already.
Or, they never went and can't.
Everything in between is retarded.
Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 13:55:29 UTC No. 16454745
>>16454731
funny how you ignored all the comments about seeing stars and then went directly to the out of context part in the press conference that you moonhoax faggots always like to mention.
what was the question they were asked?
Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 13:56:54 UTC No. 16454747
>>16454744
>>we lost all the original data
how do you figure that?
Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 14:01:45 UTC No. 16454750
Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 14:04:22 UTC No. 16454755
>>16454745
>the government doesn't lie constantly non stop about everything
Like I said, I know. We have to just take their word.
One of those quotes is from a conference in 2019. top kek
JUST POST THE IN STORE PRICES
Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 14:06:05 UTC No. 16454758
>>16454747
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yR5
They literally say that.
Now don't worry. YouTube is quick to fact check this with the following.
"The Apollo program, also known as Project Apollo, was the United States human spaceflight program carried out by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), which succeeded in preparing and landing the first men"
Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 14:08:24 UTC No. 16454761
>>16454755
>it could be fake so it must be !!!!1111
>ignores the long page of quotes from the live transmissions
moonhoaxies are the most dishonest schizo faggots there are.
Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 14:11:43 UTC No. 16454764
>>16454758
They also said they've sent people on the Moon. Why do you believe them?
Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 14:11:56 UTC No. 16454765
>>16454761
kek
The credulity is off the charts.
THEY SAID THIS THING VIA RADIO TRANSMISSION.
Was War of the Worlds real too?
Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 14:14:33 UTC No. 16454767
>>16454764
This is where you have to stop being a faggot and use your head. What's going on here?
You WANT to believe them.
Yet they have no proof.
You stuck between a rock and a hard place and instead of thinking, you react and defend people that have never offered you proof at all and obviously have enormous holes in their story.
As I said, I could believe moon bases. I can believe the real data and info is hidden from the public.
But I can't believe obviously fake shitty videos and their word.
Especially when the most important proof in the history of mankind GOES MISSING.
Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 14:28:58 UTC No. 16454777
>>16454767
Well then tell us, anon. What data got "lost" that would've "hypothetically" make you for a certain fact know that they've sent people on the Moon?
Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 14:34:23 UTC No. 16454783
>>16454758
so you're saying that if you could see the telemetry data you'd believe they went to the moon and landed on it 6 times? is this the key information you need?
Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 14:35:24 UTC No. 16454785
>>16454767
>Yet they have no proof.
apart from thousands of ultra high definition photos and thousands of geologists around the world who have examined moon rock samples in ways you cant even spell?
Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 14:35:41 UTC No. 16454786
>>16454777
All the data. >>16454758
Now this wouldn't really be for me, but you wouldn't want physicists exploring fake data. So you lose it. That seems the simplest explanation.
For a regular guy like me (who is smarter than anyone but not in a technical career) I can use common sense when looking at the videos and their actions.
They didn't go. They faked it like they fake up everything. Name the last thing the government said that was true.
You took the vaccine didn't you?
I didn't. Why? Because if you are aware at all of how governments works, you know they are lying all the time.
You know this because with any investigation all their claims fall entirely flat or have no evidence behind them.
You want to believe, they know you want to believe, and so you do.
Now, next time they offer a vaccine, I suggest you go further in your researches than what the TV is saying.
Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 14:37:53 UTC No. 16454788
>>16454783
Reading comprehension on /sci/ is lower than any board on 4ch.
No that's not what I said.
Let me ask you (hopefully you aren't black because a hypothetical is coming)...
Someone makes a grand claim. They climbed Everest alone for instance.
They claim they have proof. When you ask for the proof they say they lost it and offer you things that obviously aren't proof like text messages they sen their friend on the way up.
This person is also a demonstrable liar for the entire history of their lives.
Do you believe they climbed Everest?
Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 14:39:56 UTC No. 16454791
>>16454785
Are these the same geologists that find dinosaur bones from 300 million years ago intact?
Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 14:45:02 UTC No. 16454795
>>16454788
>No that's not what I said.
of course its not because no matter what evidence there is you wont accept it, you dishonest faggot.
>>16454791
geologists are all archeologists now? youd know if youd ever read anything other than lying moonhoax memes.
Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 14:48:10 UTC No. 16454798
>>16454795
Literally not what I said. Nice non answer.
Yes. Geologists are frequently the people that find the bones. Just do ANY of your own searching.
The paleos then come in and pretend they are dinos from 300 million years ago and they all stroke each other in a back and forth confirmation bias orgy of how old the earth is.
Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 14:49:16 UTC No. 16454799
>>16454795
Also.
I climbed Everest. I can provide you with text messages I sent from the top to my mom.
You can tell I did it because I am using exclamation points and the text messages MATCH EXACTLY with the day I said I did it.
Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 15:14:47 UTC No. 16454812
>>16454767
>Especially when the most important proof in the history of mankind GOES MISSING.
The Apollo 11 tapes went missing. The other five missions were fully documented and archived. Now, go >>>/x/ with your faggot special snowflake attention grabbing hysterics, you street-shitting tranny bore.
>>16454802
This was so funny when I saw it eight years ago and everybody thought that orange MIGA retard was going to save the country. Thanks for the blast from the past, gramma.
Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 15:18:11 UTC No. 16454817
>>16454812
Based vaccine taker.
Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 15:28:22 UTC No. 16454824
>>16454786
First of, no I didn't take the vax, anon. Second of, no I don't watch TV. Third of, which is the most important why do you even think that sending people to the Moon is a hard thing or impossible in your case? Does it cost a lot of money? Yes. Do you need smart engineers that understand how rockets work? Yes. Is it dengerous? Damn right it is. I'm pretty sure majority people either forgot or never thought about that rockets are in fact weapons. They're shooting people in space with weapons. So yes it's dangerous. But, reason why it's not that hard to send people to the Moon is because it's close. 3 days trip. There's no atmosphere. Gravity is very low on the Moon. I don't know why would you think it's hard to send people there.
Hardest part is to make a rocket reliable and powerful enough to shoot all your equipment and people in one go. It would be too expensive to use more that one rocket for one mission. The only reason why sending people to the Moon was a success was the Saturn V rockets. Now sending people to Mars thats entirely different thing. It's literally million times harder.
Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 15:33:25 UTC No. 16454832
>>16453942
>How will NASA do it?
They won't.
Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 15:35:21 UTC No. 16454836
>>16454824
This is all perfectly reasonable of course.
Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 15:53:47 UTC No. 16454857
>>16454799
dont believe you. i didnt see it, you could have faked the data, your photos were taken in a studio. all fake. total crap. it cant be done because of the radiation in the Van Helen Belt
Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 16:01:31 UTC No. 16454863
>>16454857
It's very entertaining to see the /sci/ crowd base almost every single one of their refutations in some sort of blatant logical fallacy.
Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 16:05:32 UTC No. 16454866
>>16454863
this is a moonhoax thread. thats what they are made of.
Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 16:09:14 UTC No. 16454868
>>16454866
I just get a good kick out of /sci/ having to resort to the same thing the people in churches resort to.
Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 16:22:06 UTC No. 16454880
>>16454868
do you have faith that it was faked brother?
Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 16:28:29 UTC No. 16454886
>>16454868
No.
I said earlier that I would believe moon bases ahead of the official story.
When you don't have an agenda and are not emotionally invested, you can allow of many explanations and not be concerned as long as they make sense.
If they went to the moon, and all the other BS they say is true, we'd have put a telescope on the dark side pointed out or done something useful with it.
Not "lost the data", decided not to go back, put out fake videos with obvious faking in them, etc.
So an explanation that involves them hiding the real data from the public makes sense.
Or the explanation they never went makes sense.
What makes the least sense of all proposed explanations is the one they give everyone.
Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 16:29:31 UTC No. 16454887
>>16454880
Oops....>>16454886
Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 16:32:41 UTC No. 16454888
>>16454886
>we'd have put a telescope on the dark side pointed out
Hubble etc have been doing quite nicely. Your personal and uninformed expectations dont really mean much of anything.
>put out fake videos with obvious faking in them, etc.
lol ok. Look, if you're the kind of person to be taken in my lying little webms or something equally retarded like 'American Moon', thats your business.
Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 16:36:48 UTC No. 16454891
>>16454888
I'm talking about ISS videos where you can clearly see suspension lines.
kek
I know you don't want to find out you were lied to.
They've been weaponizing space since the 80s. DEWs have existed since then for sure.
This isn't about denying or believing. It's about trying to figure out what really happened.
If you want to go to Mars, a moon base would be where you would start. You would a la Heinlein be having operations on the moon and using it as a training ground for low gravity testing as it's much easier to get there.
Why are they not? Or are they and we aren't told?
NAME THE LAST THING THE GOVERNMENT WASN'T LYING ABOUT.
Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 16:43:43 UTC No. 16454897
>>16454891
>ISS videos where you can clearly see suspension lines.
lol sure sure. post the original instead of some out of context lying little clip.
Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 17:57:24 UTC No. 16454998
>>16454897
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GRF
This is the type of stuff you guys swallow.
Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 18:03:25 UTC No. 16455005
>>16454998
>posts out of context little clip
no anon, you're the one swallowing.
Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 18:03:30 UTC No. 16455006
>>16454998
Maybe you're only seeing what you want to see.
https://youtu.be/2Lz5UeROyXM?t=78
Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 18:25:08 UTC No. 16455039
>>16454714
We've never had operational cameras on the night side. Apollo missions landed in daylight and left before night fell. Soviet and Chinese have landed rovers, but they are solar powered and go into hibernation when night falls.
No one has really put any effort to night photography on the moon because the stars would essentially identical as they do from Earth or Earth orbit. There's no scientific value.
There are some photos of the stars from Apollo 15 when they were orbiting over the night side of the moon, but the main purpose was just to test the cameras in low-light conditions.
Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 18:26:48 UTC No. 16455041
>>16455006
of course he is, they all do the exact same thing - post little tiny clips to avoid having to see anything that doesn't fit into their silly 'its all fake' worldview.
you can watch people floating around in the ISS for hours at a stretch but no, with the space-is-fake-and-gay faggots its always 20 seconds at a time. lol. cowards.
Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 18:35:30 UTC No. 16455047
>>16455006
>>16455039
More logical fallacies.
I didn't claim the ISS didn't exist or that you can't be in low earth orbit with basically zero gravity.
This is /sci/. So emotionally invested they don't ever address what you say.
Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 18:39:04 UTC No. 16455052
>>16455047
the fallacy is that you're posting something and just claiming it's fake without the slightest bit of evidence. You're stating an opinion based on nothing and acting surprised when nobody takes your claim seriously.
Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 18:51:36 UTC No. 16455079
>>16454788
>Do you believe they climbed Everest?
If they have 16000 super HD photos, hours and hours of 16mm video footage of the whole thing, had people tracking them all the way there and back, had all the equipment to do it and brought back 800lbs of rock samples, yeah, i think i would.