Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 20:04:43 UTC No. 16455159

bump

Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 20:10:28 UTC No. 16455167

Your ears aren't placed on the same spot as the mic, obviously it'll be able to hear things that you don't, and, much much much more often, it will NOT hear things you do actually hear

Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 20:21:47 UTC No. 16455179

>>16455167
Yes but this was a substantial audio transmission that I would’ve heard, as it was broadcasted at such a volume as to be heard by everyone outside in the city.

Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 20:35:18 UTC No. 16455191

>>16454314
If only you had that recording.

Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 20:36:24 UTC No. 16455192

>>16455179
>heard by everyone outside in the city
I was outside the city. I heard it.

Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 20:37:50 UTC No. 16455195

>>16455191
I do have the recording on my laptop. I watch it a lot.

>>16455192
Oh. Yes it was a global broadcast so I am not surprised. Very loud. Everyone on Earth heard it but me.

Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 20:42:44 UTC No. 16455200

>>16455195
If only there was some way to share a digital audio recording across the Internet.

Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 20:44:35 UTC No. 16455204

>>16455200
I don’t have access to my laptop currently as a video cord is broken and I need to take it to the shop.

What information would you get out of it, anyway?

Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 20:55:02 UTC No. 16455217

>>16455204
Convenient.
Proof of your larp.
>>>/x/.
Clean it up jannies.

Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 21:05:09 UTC No. 16455239

>>16455217
Even were I to post the video, you could just add an extra layer of scrutiny and say “You really heard the transmission, larper.”
The actual video proves nothing, so keep to the subject at hand, which is scientific in nature and just vaguely borders on the paranormal, which is that can neural oscillations be reformatted that external wavelengths are canceled out, similar to an interference pattern?

Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 21:14:07 UTC No. 16455254

>>16455239
You are making this all up. There is no recording. There never was. You are lying, and you are bad at it.

Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 21:19:52 UTC No. 16455262

>>16455254
I am not, and why you fixate on this makes you look stupid because even if I were lying it changes nothing to the question at hand other than there being “proof” that this has happened, when it could be easily dismissed on some other type of rational grounds.

So, because you’re retarded, does anyone else have an answer for this question?

Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 21:27:04 UTC No. 16455275

>>16455262
Your set up of the event relies on a recording you refuse to provide. Without the event, there is no question.
There is no data. There are no facts. You want /sci/ to indulge you with pure speculation for your own enjoyment.
Your thread belongs on /x/.
And you are really bad at this.

Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 21:38:13 UTC No. 16455294

>>16455275
How is there no data when I’m supplying a claim?

Are you going to analyze the recording with a type of machine, or are you just going to listen to it and confirm, yes, there was a siren and distorted voice that I claim to not have heard at the time?

The actual recording doesn’t matter in the context of the question, you mon, it’s just there as an initial reason for why the question was proposed.
Bad at what?
Lying or making you dumb faggot?
Because I’m doing neither and you’re just doing the latter.

Anonymous at Thu, 31 Oct 2024 17:26:09 UTC No. 16457195

>>16454314
why