Anonymous at Wed, 30 Oct 2024 15:10:39 UTC No. 16455876

>>16455872
Lubos was right about Sabine.

Anonymous at Wed, 30 Oct 2024 15:29:53 UTC No. 16455897

>>16455872
That video is just ridiculous. Depression rates in posdocs are higher than in the average population. Are we allowed to talk about it, or is conformity with the establishment so important that it can not withstand any sort of criticism? Yeah, she clickbaits for the American ignoramuses out there, she's making money not running a charity, I don't care.

Anonymous at Wed, 30 Oct 2024 15:37:45 UTC No. 16455911

>>16455897
>Depression rates in posdocs are higher than in the average population. Are we allowed to talk about it, or is conformity with the establishment so important that it can not withstand any sort of criticism?
This is all cope the moment you added
>Yeah, she clickbaits for the American ignoramuses out there, she's making money not running a charity,
So you don't disagree with the video. All you had to say was
>I don't care.
And leave it at that.

Anonymous at Wed, 30 Oct 2024 15:38:08 UTC No. 16455912

>>16455872
>you are le problematic because your audience includes science “deniers”
>you can’t deny science, because it’s the infallible truth
I fucking hate people like him. This blind scientism is a religion. Actual science is founded on scepticism and should encourage it. Does that mean everyone should listen to crackpots? Of course not. But neither does it mean people should be silenced or stigmatized for their scepticism. This anathema has nothing to do with science.

Anonymous at Wed, 30 Oct 2024 15:42:47 UTC No. 16455919

>>16455912
/thread
If anything i trust her even more now

Anonymous at Wed, 30 Oct 2024 15:43:00 UTC No. 16455920

>>16455872
why do """anti-establishment narratives""" bother professor rabbi so much?

Anonymous at Wed, 30 Oct 2024 15:44:09 UTC No. 16455923

>>16455911
By clickbait I mean the thumbnail and the titles. That's standard youtuber practice. People don't like it, but it makes money, I don't see the problem personally.

Anonymous at Wed, 30 Oct 2024 16:07:32 UTC No. 16455947

>>16455872
Who is professor Dave and why should I care about his opinion?

Anonymous at Wed, 30 Oct 2024 16:08:00 UTC No. 16455948

>>16455876
this
>>16455912
>>16455920
Filtered. The problem with Sabine is that she herself IS exactly the worst kind of scientist she loves to bitch about in her videos. In fact she's probably worse.
Sabine complains constantly about physicists getting funding to research ideas which she thinks won't go anywhere. She makes these bitchy videos about particle physicists, while she herself is a MoNDtard. MoND is not just "not going to go anywhere," it's already been disproven. There's an enormous amount of even basic observations which MoND can't explain at all. It's a completely trashed theory. Sabine works in it anyway, while bitching about other physicists for working on theories she doesn't personally like. It's just straight up dishonest hypocritical bullshit.
Not just that, but she's peddling her "status" as a """scientist""" to bait retards into listening to her bullshit takes on basically everything. I've worked on a topic Sabine made a video on and her opinions were outright retarded. What are the odds she knows what she's talking about on her videos on AI, economics, social issues, ecology, and basically every other meme topic out there? All while unironically being a MoND retard, continuing to intentionally ignore mountains of evidence disproving it while larping as if she's the last ethical scientist alive.
Sabine's basically the buzzfeed of physics. Stupid, braindead content for morons easily baited by basedface thumbnails. I'll never understand why people like her on this site of all places.

Anonymous at Wed, 30 Oct 2024 16:14:23 UTC No. 16455954

>>16455948
You're a stringcuck, you don't get a pass to say the shit you just said. You're the poison that's killing physics.
t. Phenomenologists
Your poison is so thick that true theorists had to rebrand themselves under the umbrella pheno to distinguish themselves from your schizo bs

Anonymous at Wed, 30 Oct 2024 16:16:07 UTC No. 16455955

>>16455954
String theory was literally never mentioned in that post you fucking mong, except for the fact Lubos was right about her because Sabine really is a dipshit.

Anonymous at Wed, 30 Oct 2024 16:18:03 UTC No. 16455957

>>16455872
Mostly I hate her because she's ugly, wears optically offensive clothes, puts on a weird non-natiev accent while having an unusual voice to begin with, all while speaking in slow motion. Plus her opinions are starting to get too contrarian for no reason, and she speaks on shit she's not an expert on at all. So everything about her.

Anonymous at Wed, 30 Oct 2024 16:24:22 UTC No. 16455960

>>16455955
Don't deflect. I didn't say you mentioned string theory. I called you a string theorist. Now address this directly: do you or do you not have formal graduate level training or higher in string theories?

Anonymous at Wed, 30 Oct 2024 16:26:28 UTC No. 16455962

>>16455948
>Sabine works in it anyway, while bitching about other physicists for working on theories she doesn't personally like. It's just straight up dishonest hypocritical bullshit.
This wasn't the criticism in the video at all. I don't know why you're bringing this up. I would have made the exact same comment on any other video with this sort of narrative.

Anonymous at Wed, 30 Oct 2024 16:29:03 UTC No. 16455963

>>16455960
There's no deflection, it should just be implicitly understood by anyone who isn't a retard (such as you, apparently) that I was telling you you were completely wrong.
I'm not a string theorist, and even if I were, pursuing string theory would still be objectively less stupid than MoND which fails when you examine even the most basic data. At least a string theorist only expects to be mostly wrong some time in the future, instead of catastrophically wrong right now.

Anonymous at Wed, 30 Oct 2024 17:01:38 UTC No. 16455997

>muh MOND
>muh string theory
the problem is the epistemic gap
physics is no longer right, it is right only within a certain "domain of validity". science is never true, it is always less and less wrong, but it is never not wrong
symbolic manipulation is taken as the absolute source to explain natural phenomena but there are also no differences between the symbolic and the phenomenal so it explains only itself
the model has defeated the real, there is no more reality, all frames of references are interchangeable and so on

Anonymous at Wed, 30 Oct 2024 17:23:59 UTC No. 16456024

>>16455963
You didn't answer my question. Did you or did you not receive formal graduate level or higher training in string theory?

Anonymous at Wed, 30 Oct 2024 18:21:53 UTC No. 16456076

>>16455872
Buy an ad, fag.

Anonymous at Wed, 30 Oct 2024 18:27:04 UTC No. 16456087

>>16455872
Her challenge of the big bang theory must have pissed some jesuits off.

Anonymous at Wed, 30 Oct 2024 18:30:56 UTC No. 16456094

>>16456076
I guess he did. Jewtube recommended that video to me, before I saw it here.

Anonymous at Wed, 30 Oct 2024 20:11:29 UTC No. 16456196

Biologist here, for years I've thought that SH was just another veritasium or two minute papers - flimsy documentaries that are technically correct but are all undergrad-approachable style over substance.
Just now I learn that she shills MoND? Is she also a timecuber?

Anonymous at Wed, 30 Oct 2024 20:13:48 UTC No. 16456200

>>16456196
>biologist
opinion discarded

Anonymous at Wed, 30 Oct 2024 20:24:59 UTC No. 16456211

>>16455872
TGFO

Anonymous at Wed, 30 Oct 2024 20:57:22 UTC No. 16456252

>>16455872
>a jewish communist is mad about a german mother
typical

Anonymous at Wed, 30 Oct 2024 20:59:12 UTC No. 16456254

>>16456196
>Biologist here
OH NO NO NO NO

Anonymous at Wed, 30 Oct 2024 21:08:22 UTC No. 16456266

>>16455872
Yay, there's two threads...

Around 7:20:
>Sabine: I'm perceiving a problem with academia (my discipline is theoretical physics where fudge factor bullshit like Dark Matter exists)
>Professor Dave: No, no, academia is rigorous and trustworthy! (my discipline is chemistry, where the results can be reproduced in any lab, anywhere)

There. I just saved you 35 minutes.

Anonymous at Wed, 30 Oct 2024 21:18:45 UTC No. 16456277

>>16456266
Thank you onii-sama

Anonymous at Wed, 30 Oct 2024 21:50:45 UTC No. 16456298

this thread and video are ultimate proof STEMtards are austically retarded

Anonymous at Wed, 30 Oct 2024 21:52:46 UTC No. 16456303

"professor" dave (he is not a real professor) is unironically a reptilian alien from the Zeta Reticuli star system who have taken over the gvmt and the media

Anonymous at Wed, 30 Oct 2024 21:54:02 UTC No. 16456306

>>16456298
No, that is the other thread. This is big brain phenotype commentary about things that factually matter.

bodhi at Wed, 30 Oct 2024 22:11:51 UTC No. 16456323

>>16455872
looks Jewish, disregarded

real scientists never listen to Jews

Anonymous at Wed, 30 Oct 2024 22:16:58 UTC No. 16456331

>>16455872
Has this woman even published ANYTHING in the past 10 years?

Anonymous at Wed, 30 Oct 2024 22:50:56 UTC No. 16456364

>>16456331
Have you?

Anonymous at Wed, 30 Oct 2024 23:07:08 UTC No. 16456379

>>16455912
it's a well-established fact that chemists have a long history of explicitly denying anything that doesn't fit into their scientific worldview
in 1772 Lavoisier, the father of modern chemistry, denied that meteorites exist, saying it was physically impossible for a rock to fall from space and that any such claim was really just an Earth rock blown into the sky by lightning. after all, you can look into the sky, and there are no rocks, so where did they come from? that would be an entirely anti-scientific claim

Anonymous at Wed, 30 Oct 2024 23:07:37 UTC No. 16456380

>>16456196
>Biologist
How's the job search going?

Anonymous at Wed, 30 Oct 2024 23:14:11 UTC No. 16456385

>>16456331
Have you?

Anonymous at Thu, 31 Oct 2024 00:50:22 UTC No. 16456463

>>16456364
>>16456385
I published 3 first authors in respectable journals in the past 6 months.
get good

Anonymous at Thu, 31 Oct 2024 00:53:15 UTC No. 16456469

>>16456463
Oh yeah? Well I don't have a job and live in my parent's basement.
So take that!

Anonymous at Thu, 31 Oct 2024 00:56:29 UTC No. 16456472

>>16455912
Also the guy doesn't even have a phd and has never worked in academia or written grants. He obviously has no idea what he's talking about.

Anonymous at Thu, 31 Oct 2024 01:07:21 UTC No. 16456482

>>16455963
Milgrom's MoND was wrong but at least testable (to be wrong).
String theory is - what exactly? It's such patent bullshit even you won't admit to being a string theory.
There are other modified-gravity proposals. I take it you are going for one of those? So far nobody's been able to pin you down on one of those. That sounds pompous and faggy.
Maybe you're into Moffat's new scalar field and vector field?

Anonymous at Thu, 31 Oct 2024 01:30:04 UTC No. 16456513

>>16456472
>No PhD
>Calls himself professor
>Sœyentist
What the fuck is his problem

Anonymous at Thu, 31 Oct 2024 01:41:55 UTC No. 16456519

>>16455872
Made is 7:30 deep. This guy is a colossal faggot. Says Sabine exaggerates post doc experience immediately followed by admitting he has no post doc experience. This dimwit needs to Kermit sudoku

Anonymous at Thu, 31 Oct 2024 02:17:57 UTC No. 16456546

>>16456482
Modern string theory takes the view that QFT without gravity itself is equivalent to a QFT with gravity in higher dimensions. This is the meat of the AdS/CFT correspondence. You don’t have to like it, but that insight is objectively more of an achievement than mond which fails the minute you notice different galaxies of similar sizes have different amounts of dark matter. It’s unironically easier to posit new particles which don’t interact with electromagnetism than to imagine mond.

Anonymous at Thu, 31 Oct 2024 02:28:27 UTC No. 16456552

>>16455912
This.
Sabine is a rare voice of reason in physics

Anonymous at Thu, 31 Oct 2024 02:39:16 UTC No. 16456561

>>16456469
Neither does Sabine, it seems.

Anonymous at Thu, 31 Oct 2024 07:10:06 UTC No. 16456710

>>16456463

may I see them?

Anonymous at Thu, 31 Oct 2024 08:16:43 UTC No. 16456740

>>16455948
"People" will hate you for saying this, but it's totally correct.

Anonymous at Thu, 31 Oct 2024 08:22:23 UTC No. 16456741

>>16456710
if you're in my field you have seen at least one of them.

Anonymous at Thu, 31 Oct 2024 08:23:50 UTC No. 16456742

>>16455872
what has "professor" dave accomplished exactly?

Anonymous at Thu, 31 Oct 2024 08:24:10 UTC No. 16456743

>>16455872
>yet another hossengoblin spa...

Wait that's that middleschool teacher dave faggot? the guy who scrapes the bottom of the barrel to debunk flat earthers

Anonymous at Thu, 31 Oct 2024 09:21:36 UTC No. 16456773

>>16456546
Hah so you ARE a stringfag. Lmfao. Ask me how I identified that four posts ago

Anonymous at Thu, 31 Oct 2024 12:20:01 UTC No. 16456856

>>16455948
>I've worked on a topic Sabine made a video on and her opinions were outright retarded.
Without the list of her retarded opinions you're nothing but a butthurt cern-wagie.
I don't know much of MoND or if she's its proponent, but from what I read about it, this theory is alive and kicking, modifying itself. And alternative points of view on complicated topics is not something we have excessive surplus of. Whatever her pet theory is, it doesn't demand an accelerator of the size of the planet.

Anonymous at Thu, 31 Oct 2024 13:25:37 UTC No. 16456900

>>16456856
Him not saying which topic says more than he thinks kek

Anonymous at Thu, 31 Oct 2024 15:38:40 UTC No. 16457091

>>16456196
>Biologist here
I kneel.

Anonymous at Thu, 31 Oct 2024 15:40:59 UTC No. 16457096

>>16456482
I too suspect that the other anon is in fact a string theory

Anonymous at Thu, 31 Oct 2024 17:38:40 UTC No. 16457212

>>16456856
>I don't know much of MoND or if she's its proponent, but from what I read about it, this theory is alive and kicking, modifying itself.

Because it disagrees with observation, and constantly needs to tune and add fudge-factors to account for ever more discrepancies. I think there needs to be an even bigger reformulation of gravity to completely replace dark matter, which is still needed even with MOND. To that end, I think even if there's a more accurate theory of gravity, some amount dark matter will still be implicated.

Anonymous at Thu, 31 Oct 2024 17:49:10 UTC No. 16457224

>>16457212
>it disagrees with observation, and constantly needs to tune and add fudge-factors to account for ever more discrepancies
Like string theory!

Anonymous at Thu, 31 Oct 2024 19:22:35 UTC No. 16457315

>>16457224
And the big bang theory (but this one is also inconsistent in some more basic plane (it would raise more questions than it answered, even if it was in agreement with the data (and the craziest thing is it didn't even answer the question it was supposed to answer)))

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 08:06:55 UTC No. 16459428

>>16455872
>OUR GIRL

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 10:13:52 UTC No. 16459502

>>16456741
well done

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 10:41:17 UTC No. 16459518

>>16455948
i agree about mond but disagree about everything else here

i don't really know why she picked something as untenable as mond to be a fangirl of, but even when it comes to mond she actually treats it pretty fairly and is very direct about its problems, so i'm willing to give her a pass

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 11:55:15 UTC No. 16459558

That Davis guy is an unbearable midwit. Outwitting flat earthers doesn't mean you're super smart, just like beating up toddlers doesn't mean you're strong.