Image not available

613x990

AFLegal.png

๐Ÿงต HAPPENING - Lawsuit filed

Anonymous No. 16456382

Billions of dollars in federal research funds by Biden-Harris to promote illegal DEI - in what Elpn Musk decries is a "corruption of science

Anonymous No. 16456432

>elites realize war with China is coming
>OH FUCK OH FUCK WE NEED TO UNSCREW OUR STRATEGIC INSTITUTIONS
kek

Anonymous No. 16456449

>>16456432
Even if all the trash were removed, after two generations of favoring trash, those whose skills and knowledge would have been in those roles are off doing other things. There is no freezer full of replacements waiting in a warehouse somewhere ready to be thawed out. If would take at least a couple of decades to even get a good start on repairing the damage.

Anonymous No. 16457568

>>16456449
You're never removing all this trash. The (((west))) is more dumpster than alley at this point.

Anonymous No. 16457605

>>16456449
The last generation of people to be in academia because it was completely politicized and ruined are rapidly dying off and with them the generational knowledge they weren't able to pass on to intellectually inadequate affirmative action cases is also dying. Soon academia will be reduced to include only knowledge that can be comprehended by an alcoholic cat lady with an unearned PhD

Anonymous No. 16457641

>>16457605
We're basically already there. For a good 20 or 30 years scientific witchcraft has totally taken over

>Math IS science!
>If something can be proven in math that means it exists in real life! hurrr
>Genetic mutations occur like radioisotope decay, therefore we can tell how old a species is by its divergence from relatives (this is bullshit)
>COI "Barcoding" is reliable science! Barcode is right in the name! It's techy! (has never worked in a grocery store to know that bar codes are wrong all the fucking time)
>Um axchually it's rude to criticize your peers' work. All theories are equally valid!

Anonymous No. 16457644

>>16456432
This a glownigger talking point. There will never be a war between the mid satan and chinkland. Chinkland is literally mcdonald's manufacturing base. Both countries implode without the other. Not even within weeks. Literally within days.

Anonymous No. 16457657

>>16457644
>economic ties make war impossible
Where have we heard this before? It sounds so familiar....

>In The Great Illusion, Angell's primary thesis was, in the words of historian James Joll, that "the economic cost of war was so great that no one could possibly hope to gain by starting a war the consequences of which would be so disastrous."[4][5] For that reason, a general European war was very unlikely to start, and if it did, it would not last long.[6] He argued that war was economically and socially irrational[7] and that war between industrial countries was futile because conquest did not pay.
>PUBLISHED 1909
Oh....

The CCP doesn't give a shit, they're going to invade Taiwan anyway. Plot the number of VLS cells the PLAN has. They've spent a great deal of money on something that according to your theory is wholly irrational. Therefore your theory that they are and will behave in a rational way is simply bullshit.

Anonymous No. 16457670

>>16457657
Bitch you're retarded. These are not "economic ties", it's like a mitochondrion going to war with the cell it's in.

Anonymous No. 16457676

>>16457670
>it's not economic ties, it's... uh.... gay biology analogy for economic ties
You stupid clown.

Anonymous No. 16457677

>>16457676
You glowniggers are getting dumber by the month. Did your bosses switch out all the illegal cubans for literal chimps?

Anonymous No. 16457678

>>16457677
>anon completely loses his composure when confronted with the fact that his argument was made and definitively debunked more than a century ago
Sad!

Anonymous No. 16457687

>>16457678
Okay, let's make you work for those shilling shekels. Is america going to bring its manufacturing back to america or perhaps transfer the monumental infrastructure it has throughout china to different countries?

Next question: is china's economy at all reliant on the american manufacturing industrial park its turned itself into?

The answers to these two questions are simple and obvious. Let's see what medal you get in glownigger acrobatics.

And...GO!

Image not available

483x470

1729978003490916.png

Stop guessing start learning No. 16457688

>>16457657
Agreed war brings economic benefits like land and resources.

The payoff is huge.

Look at when Russia annexed mariupol.
They have access to ports, oil trade, resources etc

Anonymous No. 16457690

>>16457687
America isn't the one who starts this war, dipshit.
>China won't do something irrational
Absolute retard. The PLAN buildup is irrational if they're not going to start a war, so either way you slice it they aren't behaving rationally. You absolutely retarded clown.

Anonymous No. 16457694

>>16457690
Funny you didn't answer EITHER question. Very interesting.

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ Anonymous No. 16457710

1. corruption of science is not legal
2. DEI is not science, everyone admits that
3. DEI is imposed by big corporations like musk, not by the government

musk will have fun suing the banks that lend him money and losing his company as a consequence

Anonymous No. 16457713

1. corruption of science is legal, there is no constitutional guarantee to "DEI"
2. DEI is not science, everyone admits that
3. DEI is imposed by big corporations like musk, not by the government

musk will have fun suing the banks that lend him money and losing his company as a consequence

Anonymous No. 16457715

>>16457713
Big corporations have owned the government longer than your grandparents have been alive. Anything that is imposed by one is imposed by both.

Anonymous No. 16459493

>>16457678
The difference is that a century ago, mass consumer and industrial technologies and the logistics networks propping them up were primitive compared to what we have now. The level of interdependence is far deeper, standards of living higher. Global population has exploded, and consumption with it.

I mean, forget about microwaves and iPhones. The subject is war, so how about military equipment. Do you think China and the US can push out tanks, IFVs, fighter jets, etc at a sufficient rate to prop up losses? The cost of building 1 Bradley is equivalent to dozens of T34s, and the two aren't even in the same class of equipment. How many T34s are equivalent to 1 Abrams tank, or a Leopard? How many Spitfires are equivalent in cost to an F35?

>>16457694
The deflection was funny. Hypothetically if the CCP decided to make a move for Taiwan, it'd be under conditions where global security is far more unstable than today, i.e. the US is in a state of growing internal turmoil, to the extent that they're increasingly unable to meaningfully engage in overseas imperial management.

Anonymous No. 16459498

>>16457688
It only brings economic benefit if you don't cock it up, case in point their "special military operation" oligarch spat that spiralled out of control.
What do you know, spooks, oligarchs, and ethnic-gang mafiosos (not mutually exclusive) who embezzle money from the government purse aren't competent warfighters. Who pays the price? The oligarchs who curiously keep the pipelines into Ukraine running, the trade ship ghost fleets active, or the conscript who isn't even provided basic equipment, fighting a conflict that never should've come to be?

What's funny is they're not even allowed to complain about this brazen corruption or they get charged with 'undermining the armed forces'. Social media groups crowdfunding the equipment costs of conscripts were shut down for this reason.

Russia is just a bad example in general for anything. It's not a state with rational geopolitical interests, it's a collection of economic parasite gangsters in a trench-coat larping as a country. A lot of stars need to align for them to carry out successful military operations.

Anonymous No. 16459500

>>16459493
Something else worth mentioning is that even if military industry was completely nationalized and the fiat cost of operation is no longer of particular relevance, it would still be virtually impossible to replace losses 1:1 quickly enough with today's technological standards. Supply chains today are incomparable to those 100 years ago, across every single industry, both in magnitude and sophistication.

Anonymous No. 16459962

>>16459498
>What do you know, spooks, oligarchs, and ethnic-gang mafiosos (not mutually exclusive) who embezzle money from the government purse aren't competent warfighters
Ironically the SMO in ukraine has been the only effective way to purge corruption from the russian military industrial complex, since it forced honest results on the battlefield. You have long neglected factories like Uralvagonzavod that are now operating in 24/7 shifts shitting out tanks, and anybody embezzling or fucking up deliveries would now be charged with treason and "undermining the armed forces of RF".
You basically need to be at war to truly have the ability to wage war, or everyone gets complacent.

Anonymous No. 16459964

>>16457690
>The PLAN buildup is irrational if they're not going to start a war
they're clearly going to force taiwan's hand at some point, so what? why is that our war? just tell me when to sell my TSMC shares Xi and I'll be happy

Anonymous No. 16459966

>>16457657
ZOG wanted brothers wars, so they happened
They won't cause any wars with china

Anonymous No. 16459968

>>16459964
What do you mean "clearly" ? It's far more likely that taiwan will just join mainland china eventually

Anonymous No. 16459990

>>16459968
why else would Xi invest so much into PLAN? At some point they'll have the ability to blockade taiwan and force a peaceful resolution through overwhelming superiority, unless of course our mutt army is sent in (in which we case we get insanely kino footage of ASM's obliterating aircraft carriers on both sides)

Anonymous No. 16460012

Do people really not know that decoupling is already underway and that weapons development by the US has accelerated relative to ~1991-2018?