Anonymous at Thu, 31 Oct 2024 11:39:49 UTC No. 16456832

>>16456831
Hilbert was smartee

Anonymous at Thu, 31 Oct 2024 11:41:34 UTC No. 16456834

>>16456831
Objection. Einstein wasn't human. He was the last Anunnaki—vessel carriers of alien species with superior intellect who came to earth to advance us. When they realized humans would use such knowledge to construct nuclear bombs they abandoned us, causing progress in fundamental knowledge to slow to a halt and to reach deadend.

Anonymous at Thu, 31 Oct 2024 11:46:21 UTC No. 16456839

>>16456831
Euler, Gauss and Newton mog him

Anonymous at Thu, 31 Oct 2024 16:23:18 UTC No. 16457140

so smart he was unemployed after getting his phd and had to resort to asking favors for a position as a clerk at a patent office

Anonymous at Thu, 31 Oct 2024 16:40:30 UTC No. 16457154

>>16456831
>of all time
Nah, at best in his time.
But even that polish woman who landed in frogland was smarter in his time.

>>16456839
This guy gets it, Euler, Gauss and Liebniz instead of Newton.

Anonymous at Thu, 31 Oct 2024 17:08:56 UTC No. 16457185

>>16456831
King of the midwits

Anonymous at Thu, 31 Oct 2024 17:25:26 UTC No. 16457194

>>16457140
faggots that equate money to intelligence are massive retards.

Anonymous at Thu, 31 Oct 2024 18:26:29 UTC No. 16457268

>>16456831
>He's a physicist and not a mathematician.
lmao

Anonymous at Thu, 31 Oct 2024 19:46:41 UTC No. 16457325

>>16456831
That is not davinci? Im confused

Anonymous at Thu, 31 Oct 2024 20:04:34 UTC No. 16457335

>>16457140
That’s just anyone after academia

Anonymous at Thu, 31 Oct 2024 21:50:31 UTC No. 16457443

>>16456831
did he copy heavily from other guys?

Anonymous at Thu, 31 Oct 2024 23:42:23 UTC No. 16457554

>>16456831
as far as analytical skills in the physics of the continuum are concerned, probably still the best man we have ever had.
and possibly the best man we ever will have had.

Anonymous at Fri, 1 Nov 2024 01:31:32 UTC No. 16457632

The theories of general and special relativity were a result of decades of work by scientists across various disciplines.
The papers put out by Einstein just tied all the theories together. That's usually how scientific breakthroughs go. Its always the redactor that gets the credit.
A lot of people around the time were putting forth similar theories. But Einstein, being a colorful eccentric and le humble patent clerk, was just the best candidate for being a pop sci rockstar.

Anonymous at Fri, 1 Nov 2024 02:03:05 UTC No. 16457664

>>16457154
>Liebniz instead of Newton
Wouldn't Newton be smarter, considering the proven fact that Leibniz stole calculus from him?

Anonymous at Fri, 1 Nov 2024 13:30:50 UTC No. 16458140

>>16456831
his mustache is too wide for that