Anonymous at Fri, 1 Nov 2024 18:18:08 UTC No. 16458584
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bp1
🗑️ Anonymous at Fri, 1 Nov 2024 18:41:25 UTC No. 16458640
>>16458581
Watching him die inside, while on that panel show where his fellow guests said space isn't important as long as Trump can be elected, was good quality schadenfreude.
Anonymous at Fri, 1 Nov 2024 18:49:25 UTC No. 16458665
>>16458581
Looks like he's bat-spit insane.
Not a real scientist, but he plays one on TV.
🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 02:59:02 UTC No. 16459232
>>16458640
Trump will do more for space travel than any president since JFK, he already made massive progress in his first term by founding the space force and getting astronauts back to flying on American made gear
Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 04:51:36 UTC No. 16459301
>>16458581
12 year old me never trusted this faggot
Adult me started to warm up to him a bit but that was a mistake
Always trust your 12 year old self's judgement
Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 09:13:52 UTC No. 16459468
>>16459301
Grow up and learn to trust le hecking science!
https://youtu.be/IFgBFYkBZ6E
🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 11:39:35 UTC No. 16459553
>>16458581
Helped elect Trump. Many people who looked up to him, realized he went insane when he went woke.
Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 12:20:02 UTC No. 16459571
>>16459553
American Politics is just a sham, the real damage he and his kind have was way worse than that. They caused public to lose their trust in scientific thinking and become skeptical towards even long established scientific facts. Flat earther, anti vaccine crowds, chemtrail believer and many others are thriving thanks to them.
Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 12:24:34 UTC No. 16459575
>>16459571
>They caused public to lose their trust in scientific thinking
Politics DOES influence science.
Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 12:34:32 UTC No. 16459577
E-long Husk
🗑️ Dave at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 15:56:04 UTC No. 16459733
>>16459232
>Trump will do more for space travel than any president since JFK
imagine believing this crap
Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 15:58:33 UTC No. 16459737
🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 16:41:32 UTC No. 16459761
>>16459733
NSF funded physics research more under trump than Biden. Bidens policies may have increased the NSF funds but with the caveat that it's for dei research and the raw amount funding non-dei research has gone down.
Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 17:04:30 UTC No. 16459778
>>16459761
NASA is now the most WOKE organization in the USA government.
The Artemis program exists for DEI astronauts.
Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 17:11:09 UTC No. 16459782
>>16458581
>Name a worse character arc.
muskrat
Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 17:12:55 UTC No. 16459786
>>16459232
>>16459733
>>16459761
>>16459778
Anything publicly funded is radioactive these days, and expecting any progress coming out of there diversity programs would be childish. Our only hope is channeling space exploration efforts to the private companies. SpaceX is the first one to do it, but there is no reason for it to remain as the only one.
Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 01:36:26 UTC No. 16461631
>>16459786
> but there is no reason for it to remain as the only one.
there is a reason, the others all have the same affirmative action hiring practices the government does.
Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 09:32:14 UTC No. 16461928
>>16459571
>lumping the antivaxxers in with actual schizos and thinking no one would notice
They censor the antivaxxers because they're right. They don't censor the flat earthers because they're wrong and therefore irrelevant.
Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 09:45:12 UTC No. 16461931
>>16461928
> They censor the antivaxxers because they're right.
This isn't true. They censor antivaxxers because vaccines are an incredibly profitable racket. It is reasonable to be skeptical about vaccine safety when so little is done to actually ensure safety protocols are followed. It is not reasonable to jump to conclusions in the way that many antivaxxers do.
We can agree that the way the COVID shot was mandated was fucking retarded and there was basically no evidence for its efficacy in major segments of the population. This doesn't invalidate the largely impartial research that has come out demonstrating that outside of the relatively rare incidences of myocarditis, it is largely "safe." It's generally a low-risk low-reward choice for most young and healthy people (which is why I personally never got it, because I'd already had COVID by the time it became available and I didn't see the point in the marginal risk).
Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 13:44:11 UTC No. 16463513
>>16459575
Whats with the umbrella logo in the top corner?
Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 13:44:36 UTC No. 16463514
>>16461931
Only if you ignore every bit of evidence and sweep regulatory capture under the rug and blind yourself to the transitive property of vaccines because they have the same name oh and that is why they dont have to be safety tested to the same insufficient standard as before.
You are basically retarded. Good luck.
Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 16:28:25 UTC No. 16463738
>>16459782
Vulva-shaped rockets don't fly well. Also, what body part is shaped like a goods distribution network, or a battery factory?
Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 17:25:45 UTC No. 16463814
>>16458581
BNTSG was golden age of PBS programming, and was is own standard in the early nineties. I think it raised the appreciation and comprehension of academic science and research.
I saw him give a talk/lecture/powerpoint presentation recently and while he's aged he's still good at engaging kids and their parents about supporting science & arts, critical thinking about misinformation and supporting kids' ability to develop lifelong careers in scientific fields.
I feel like the cringey shit 10 years ago is more a reflection of how different culture and society are vs 30 years ago. Back then I wouldn't have imagined a black science man squashing beefs on a weird huge chat forum thing.
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Nov 2024 19:16:20 UTC No. 16466280
>>16463513
Its a Maltese cross
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Nov 2024 19:57:55 UTC No. 16466336
>>16459782
>blue orgy
>pay sex
>virgin
>>16463738
>the rocket has a glans because of aerodynamics
Anonymous at Fri, 8 Nov 2024 03:44:48 UTC No. 16466755
>>16459575
i agree with this slide, bigotry is usually just a cop out from thinking about why data shows differences between socially defined groups of people.
Anonymous at Fri, 8 Nov 2024 03:46:26 UTC No. 16466757
>>16459786
>Anything publicly funded is radioactive these days
>Our only hope is channeling space exploration efforts to the private companies.
With public funding?
Anonymous at Fri, 8 Nov 2024 04:32:00 UTC No. 16466800
>>16466757
As the CHIPS Act has shown, public funding can come with lots of strings that aren't worth the money but straight forward purchases of services, such as "we give you x million, you put this satellite into this orbit" is fine. The problem comes in when there's a requirement of "and your rocket must be built at least 37% by refugees". The best contracts probably are those for launching spy satellites because there's no point adding DEI requirements when those can't be virtue signaled to the public.
Anonymous at Fri, 8 Nov 2024 07:02:00 UTC No. 16466879
>>16466800
But who is buying those chips when the tarriffs hit.
Anonymous at Fri, 8 Nov 2024 07:44:50 UTC No. 16466902
>>16466879
What do you mean? If the fabs in the US, USAians would buy chips from the US fabs without paying a tariff on them. If the US fabs mode more chips than the United States could use, maybe then there would be an issue with other countries slapping tariffs on those chips, but that would be for people in that country to pay.
Anonymous at Sat, 9 Nov 2024 04:15:00 UTC No. 16467956
>>16458581
In Bill Nye's defense:
he isn't jewish
he isn't black
he isn't female
so he has at least 3 positive things going for him
Anonymous at Sat, 9 Nov 2024 04:24:17 UTC No. 16467963
>>16467956
>worked for Boeing
And the above wipes all that out.
Anonymous at Sat, 9 Nov 2024 08:24:16 UTC No. 16468085
>>16461631
What the hell is Bezos doing with Blue Origin??
Anonymous at Sat, 9 Nov 2024 15:44:57 UTC No. 16468347
>>16468085
Following the old space blueprint but without the funds of a superpower nor the talent pool of the 1960s.
Anonymous at Sat, 9 Nov 2024 21:57:58 UTC No. 16468781
>>16466755
>every single white person around the world agreed to secretly manipulate black people into committing crimes and dropping out of college
>no it's you who are a conspiracy theorist chud
what a shame
Anonymous at Sat, 9 Nov 2024 21:59:11 UTC No. 16468783
>>16458581
isnt this guy dead or something
Anonymous at Sat, 9 Nov 2024 22:02:53 UTC No. 16468787
>>16468781
Not a single word of your response is what that post actually said. I hope you consider actually thinking about things someday.
Anonymous at Sat, 9 Nov 2024 22:05:58 UTC No. 16468791
>>16468787
>n-no.. I didn't say that mr. Chud.. I d-din't mean it like that..
instant fear of a direct conflict, classic
Anonymous at Sat, 9 Nov 2024 22:19:14 UTC No. 16468804
>>16459782
>spacex building next generation of space tech is the same as jeff bezos space tourism retirement activity
not a musk fanboy, I think he's a retard, but people who he employs(actual engineers and scientists) are not retards and they are actually trying to build something new and cutting edge. comparing it to bezos is insane disingenuousness
Anonymous at Sat, 9 Nov 2024 22:59:50 UTC No. 16468841
>>16468791
Notice how every response of yours is to things you've imagined me saying. You seem like a preoccupied and fundamentally incurious person, and I hope that you try having a genuine conversation in the future.
Anonymous at Sat, 9 Nov 2024 23:10:54 UTC No. 16468860
>>16468841
>you are imagining stuff
bro you are the one believing all white people are a part of a secret shadow government which only mission is to discharge fire alarm's batteries in black people's homes, don't tell me about making things up
🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 9 Nov 2024 23:58:43 UTC No. 16468928
>>16458581
Come on....
Anonymous at Sun, 10 Nov 2024 06:44:29 UTC No. 16469336
In the science community, yes, but probably because there are not many other notable figures. Poor guy, I hope despite his mistakes, he is loved.
Anonymous at Mon, 11 Nov 2024 03:15:44 UTC No. 16470342
>>16468804
>actual engineers and scientists
he doesn't employ scientists because scientists don't do anything useful or worthwhile. engineers build things.
Anonymous at Mon, 11 Nov 2024 03:26:22 UTC No. 16470349
>>16466336
Show me vulva shaped rocket that can go to moon
Anonymous at Mon, 11 Nov 2024 03:36:25 UTC No. 16470356
>>16459301
>Always trust your 12
haha infinite ice cream goo-ACK
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Nov 2024 18:10:56 UTC No. 16472182
>>16458581
>Name a worse character arc.
Bill Cosby
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Nov 2024 01:59:57 UTC No. 16474199
>>16472182
Not /sci/.
Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 02:50:51 UTC No. 16475574
>>16458581
creepy pedo looking guy
Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 04:32:15 UTC No. 16475688
>>16459782
Look inward, Thunderf00t
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 02:04:42 UTC No. 16477364
>>16458581
used to work at boeing, was on almost live, had his own TV show, then went bat shit crazy.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 03:49:07 UTC No. 16477441
>>16458581
Michael Mann becomes more and more of a hack. And James Hansen.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 03:52:43 UTC No. 16477444
>>16463814
>critical thinking about misinformation
Do you think Nye will ever admit Fauchi funded Daszak and Barics work at WIV and is culpable for covid origin?
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 04:15:30 UTC No. 16477464
>>16463814
"Democratizing science" has achieved the result not that more people appreciate or comprehend science, only that more people think they appreciate or comprehend science.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 02:51:19 UTC No. 16478501
>>16477464
>Democratizing science
"if you disagree with us you're a racist bigot nazi and deserve to be murdered" doesn't sound very democratic to me.