Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 07:27:23 UTC No. 16459396

>>16459327
Black holes are technically a type of star

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 09:22:50 UTC No. 16459475

It's a constellation

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 18:43:10 UTC No. 16459867

>>16459396
in what way? they don't have fusion

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 05:30:26 UTC No. 16460587

>>16459867
> they don't have fusion
proof?

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 08:24:24 UTC No. 16460681

>>16460587
no temperature

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 19:07:53 UTC No. 16461259

>>16459867
Don't pretend there isn't any fusion happening around that event horizon

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 19:16:15 UTC No. 16461268

>>16461259
accretion disks are not necessarily a part of a black hole

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 21:02:36 UTC No. 16461390

>>16460681
Black holes have temperature.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 21:14:30 UTC No. 16461402

>>16461390
not fusion temperature.
do I have to spell out everything?

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 21:46:06 UTC No. 16461441

>>16459327
Okay first off its "Sagittarius A*" not "Sagittarius A Star".
So your confusion is because you are an ESL faggot or British.


>>16459396
No, this is incorrect and you are retarded.


>>16459475
No. Sagittarius A is a region not a constellation.


Any other space questions I can clear up for you obvious retards?