🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 17:01:58 UTC No. 16459774
Evolutionarily speaking, we don't actually need numbers that surpass 20 or 30. We couldn't herd more sheep than that at any point in time during our history, there's no practical and real use for any number beyond that. It was only after morons invented currency that big numbers became relevant for day-to-day use. But apart from that, and if we really think hard about the fact that money is made up and fictional, we wouldn't need numbers as high as the ones mathematicians insist on using. The only real world use for numbers that high would be in astronomy, and even then, you don't actually need to be able to count that high or crunch numbers in your head to make things make sense. All you need to understand when it comes to astronomy is the relationship between numbers, rather than the numbers themselves. And I get what you're thinking; what about economy? Again, it doesn't even really exist, why would anyone ever as much as try to combine numbers that great? Stop trying to make your gay numbers relevant in my life, they don't even matter. I'm not learning your stupid funny numbers as if it were a game, don't try to convince me.
Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 17:04:12 UTC No. 16459777
We need 40 numbers, retard.
Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 17:23:14 UTC No. 16459791
Ask yourselves, at what point in time in recorded history were big numbers actually something crucial to life or death? That's correct. Never. Did hunter-gatherers go out and kill 2 thousand and a hundred and seventy two different animals during one session of hunting? Probably didn't. When, at any point in time did farmers ever need to count every single thing they've produced over the course of a year? They didn't need to do that, ever. If we took a time machine and went back in time during periods where farming was the way to sustain yourself, do you really think that they ever sat down inside of their farm houses and thought to themselves the impact that them producing a thousand different pieces of vegetables to society? Were they ever concerned about the fact that maybe they didn't reach their potential to the fullest when it came to producing food? No, it didn't matter as long as they didn't starve. Fast forward to today's time, and we're having farmers paying taxes to the government based on how much they produce. It's a joke and I don't want part of it, keep your stupid numbers and made up ideas, and don't bother me.
Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 20:34:02 UTC No. 16460002
i get what you're saying but you are being silly
Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 21:21:40 UTC No. 16460040
>grug count grugs in grug tribe
>grug only count up to 30 grugs before say enough
>grug tribe hunt elephant herd
>elephant herd kill 170 grugs
>grug count surviving grugs after hunt
>grug still count 30 grugs
>100% survival rate! huge success! grug tribe hunt even bigger elephant herd!