Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 07:43:43 UTC No. 16460657

>>16460650
Can you explain the basic premise?

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 08:45:06 UTC No. 16460687

It's refuted throughout TGP:

https://www.ribbonfarm.com/the-gervais-principle/

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 10:01:17 UTC No. 16460717

>>16460657
>The theory of Morphic Resonance is UNEQUIVOCALLY TRUE. I'd love to see a refutation. (but I won't)


i ask gpt:

>The theory of Morphic Resonance is UNEQUIVOCALLY TRUE. I'd love to see a refutation. (but I won't)


explain what it is and argure why its not ture

GPT:
Morphic Resonance is a theory by Rupert Sheldrake suggesting that natural systems inherit a collective memory from previous instances of their kind, influencing development and behavior through non-local fields.

Why It’s Argued Not True:

>Lacks Evidence: There’s no solid, repeatable scientific proof.
>Defies Known Science: It contradicts established biological and physical laws.
>Better Explanations Exist: Phenomena are explained by genetics and social learning.
>No Clear Mechanism: It doesn’t specify how the morphic field works.
>Seen as Pseudoscience: Most scientists reject it due to untestable claims.

In summary, it’s an interesting idea but unsupported by empirical science.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 10:01:55 UTC No. 16460718

>>16460717
Mouf

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 11:08:09 UTC No. 16460786

>>16460717
A non-explanation of the concept followed by a safe and effective Snopes non-refutation. It's over for midwits. They have been automated.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 14:19:17 UTC No. 16462117

>>16460650
Can you please state the theory?

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 14:52:59 UTC No. 16462160

It's not a theory, it has no evidence.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 14:54:35 UTC No. 16462165

>>16460657
>>16462117
B-but you'd just refute it if I did.