Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 07:56:03 UTC No. 16460664

>>16460658
>Has anyone to date proposed a mechanism of action for this?
You smoke 4 packs a day and then it dawns on you that this is bad for your health so now you only smoke a pack a day and make up for the rest of e-cigarette cancer juice.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 14:25:08 UTC No. 16460932

>>16460658
>Healio Strategic Solutions (HSS) is a full-service medical communications company providing tailored information and education to physicians worldwide.
Sounds like a propaganda firm to me. Post a real source like a study.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 18:29:34 UTC No. 16461197

>>16460658
That's just the normal psychological and sociological action.
>"X is le bad"
>do something obviously worse instead
>"yeah but it's not X"
people are mass hypnotized into not understanding that coating their lungs with random toxic industrial chemicals is extremely bad for their lungs

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 23:28:18 UTC No. 16461536

>>16460664
That's not a mechanism unless you can explain how/why the vaping is worse for you than the 3 packs of cigs you're not smoking

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 07:49:15 UTC No. 16461887

>>16460658
Cheap black market cigarettes aren't as dangerous as cheap black market vape juice.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 08:39:55 UTC No. 16461914

>>16461536
>That's not a mechanism
the mechanism is "more nicotine = more cancer"

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 08:54:24 UTC No. 16461916

>hmm this graph I found in a blog is outrageous who could believe it!

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 09:50:00 UTC No. 16461934

>>16460658
people who vape are just physically inferior specimens in general.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 12:09:27 UTC No. 16462007

>>16461914
It's actually pretty controversial that nicotine is itself a carcinogen. Regardless theres not enough evidence that that is the mechanism here.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 12:14:35 UTC No. 16462011

>>16460658

Yeah easy: It's not true. They made it up. It's false.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 12:24:08 UTC No. 16462015

>>16461914
No, the mechanism is that the more a plant uptakes radioactive emissions, the more it has become carcinogenic after the widespread nuclear testing of the 1950s that coated every area on earth in a noticeable layer of radioactive sediment.