Image not available

940x812

1.png

๐Ÿงต Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16460694

Why is that?

Anonymous No. 16460698

>>16460694
damn, depressed female looking absolutely breedable!

Anonymous No. 16460708

>>16460694
Low fertility ratios strongly imply that things like Schizophrenia, Autism and Bipolar disorder cannot be strictly genetic as any genetic component related to them and carried by someone will depres overall fertility and render his lineage void.

Anonymous No. 16460805

>>16460708
Do we read the same graphic?
If the assum that female autists and schizos breed more ofter, than its a condition that just select one sex negative

Anonymous No. 16460828

>>16460698
A female gets depressed because she's not fertilized, retard.

Anonymous No. 16460829

>>16460828
I can fix her

Anonymous No. 16460917

>>16460708
you do not understand genetics

Anonymous No. 16460962

>>16460805
>If the assum that female autists and schizos breed more ofter
Fertility ratio is still massively supressed for females in both cases. A fertility rate of 0.4 effectively means that the average number of children such a person has is going to be 0.8. That also means that roughly 40 % of all such women are not going to have any kids. Clear negative pressure.

Anonymous No. 16460965

>>16460917
>you do not understand genetics
Any gene associated with a condition that suppresses fertility by up to 80 % would find itself selected against.
There are really only a couple of ways by which these conditions could keep appearing over and over again:
-Single-Gene disorders which are genetically recessive
Explains: Some cases which are associated with intellectual/physiological defects. They could theoretically remain unexpressed for a couple generations.
Problem: None of the three conditions follow Mendelian inheritance patterns.
-De novo mutations
Explains: Sudden appearance of the conditions in families that don't have any family history of them.
Problem: Copy variant issues have been extensively studied by now. They don't account for more than 5-10 % of all cases (and even there, the association is at most mediocre)
-Inherited genetic variants that become pathological due to environmental stressors
Explains: The strong relationship between Schizophrenia/Autism and autoimmune disorders/metabolism. The recent increase in autistic and arguably bipolar presentations over the last decades also implies environmental factors. Goes together neatly with the observation that over the last 40 years, public exposure towards prescribed medicine, vaccines, food dyes, chemicals etc. has increased massively. All these substances are known to negatively affect fetal development (which has been implicated in all three conditions).
Problem: Out of all possible scenarios, probably the most likely to apply generally.
-Common genetic variants that are associated with schizophrenic/autistic/bipolar traits.
Explains: The traits are normally distributed across the population. They have not been selected against because they confer overall evolutionary advantages to people and only depress evolutionary fitness once the associated behavioral traits become too dominant.
Problem: In combination with de novo mut. and environmentally induced syndromes, no actual problem arises.

Anonymous No. 16460973

>>16460965
So, for example, autism can be neatly split up into three categories depending on how the symptomatological presentation came to be:
Autism A that is down to normally distributed inherited variants
Autism B that is down to environmental factors causing some inherited gene to become pathological.
Autism C which involves de novo mutations.

There are probably a couple of other autisms. Autism D that is caused by traumatic experience (would theoretically explain the overlap between autism and PSSD in presentation), Autism E involves destruction of the brain on a neuronal level (demyelination etc.) due to viral infections (encephalomeningitis). Autism E and Autism B constitute most if not all of regressive autism. Autism F is caused by a form of Hepatitis which can render previously normal adults severely autistic. Autism G is any of the autistic syndromes brought on by long-term pharmaceutical drugging.

Anonymous No. 16461999

>>16460694
So what are the chances for male autists with female autists?

Anonymous No. 16462053

>people can't read a fucking chart
The state of /sci/ holy shit.

Anonymous No. 16462073

>>16460828
Good thinking 99.

Anonymous No. 16462317

>>16460694
1) If I have schizophrenia, does substance abuse make me more fertile? I guess yes, because after week long meth session I ejaculate lot of stuff.

2) Schizophrenia is associated with more oxidative stress(haloperidol causes 8 fold increase in ROS) which is not good for leydig cells, also, it comes with telomere shortening, which is epigenetical mayhem. But you can bring those stats back, are you more fertile then?

Anonymous No. 16462374

>>16460694
I always thought people suffering from autism do not tolerate physical contact? That would explain their incapability of sex.

Anonymous No. 16462396

Fuck it, post videos of autistic woman, and let's rank their breedability.

Anonymous No. 16462471

>>16462396
Please, give this a shot.

Anonymous No. 16462499

>>16462396
Well, mbot is just too orgasmic and in far too high resolution for posting here. And she is autistic.

Anonymous No. 16462503

>>16460694
>female fertility always above male fertility
Thanks, I wasn't looking to be fucking blackpilled today

Anonymous No. 16462505

>>16462499
Create a highres thread and link it here.

I think some autistic girls can be ubercute, like once I seen video of girl, that get overexcited by music, and it looked really nice.

Anonymous No. 16462582

>>16462505
>Create a highres thread and link it here.
Too much work, try her Insta instead (some nudity):
https://www.picuki.com/profile/mdollbot
>I think some autistic girls can be ubercute, like once I seen video of girl, that get overexcited by music, and it looked really nice.
That would be Jay Will Float Too.
https://www.tiktok.com/@jay_will_float_too/video/6854406859860806918

Anonymous No. 16462595

>>16462582
Well, Latex is kinky, but I don't like that.

Yes, that's Jay.

Anymore autism?

Anonymous No. 16462601

>>16462582
Jay needs psychotherapy on LSD, and antioxidant rich diet, possibly with L-Theanine.

It could help her.

Jill Stein won the election No. 16462602

Unvoidable subjects

Anonymous No. 16462768

>>16462595
>Well, Latex is kinky, but I don't like that.
People on the spectrum often enjoys the compression from a catsuit, and latex can be very compressive.

>>16462374
>I always thought people suffering from autism do not tolerate physical contact?
A common problem, and I know someone like that. Compression suits seem to help, not sure why.

Anonymous No. 16462821

>>16460694
I am a high-IQ aspie.
If you asked me what my reasons for abstinence are, it's that the act of sex seems "too much" for me, "too intimate". For the record, I have to labor to look people in the eyes or to keep eye contact.
If it came to it, I don't think I could perform, even if I were very horny at the sight of the woman.

I do experience normal-ish sexual urges otherwise, and I frequently on 4chan make lewd comments about fictional characters (e.g. "Corin is for rape"), but my desires to the deed even here are lessened, and I never watch real porn. I only really like /e/-tier shit in that regard. My sexuality is rather innocent, a normie would say.
I don't understand most fetishes. My "kink/fetish" is if a girl wears a cute costume or something.

I wonder why I am so significantly different from the norm.

Anonymous No. 16462843

>>16460708
daily reminder that there is no known neurological basis for schizophrenia, autism, depression or any other mental illness you can think of
this should keep you up at night

Anonymous No. 16462926

>>16460708
>Low fertility ratios strongly imply that things like Schizophrenia, Autism and Bipolar disorder cannot be strictly genetic
Yes? Has anyone ever claimed they are strictly genetic? lol

Anonymous No. 16463332

>>16462926
>Has anyone ever claimed they are strictly genetic?
Psychiatrists? All the time.
Remember, just two more weeks until we find the schizo gene.

Anonymous No. 16463422

>>16462396
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=75jXvMxxvg0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nIPQZKCUgd4
Both already have children so guess they rank 1.

Anonymous No. 16463460

>>16460708
Both these disorders are mostly genetic, there seems to some environmental influence cause it's not 100%. But we have identified the genes associated with these disorders and they are indeed decreasing in frequency in the population.
>>16463332
>gene
They're polygenetic.

Anonymous No. 16463659

>>16462843
I'm perfectly aware of the fact that mental illness labels are socially constructed. However, whatever correlates with these labels, which is associated with decreased fertility rates, does not seem to decrease in frequency. Hence either the schizophrenic/autistic/bipolar traits aren't genetically inherited or they do not depress fertility rates (which would be caused by the label then).
>>16463460
>Both these disorders are mostly genetic
Twin studies cannot meaningfully distinguish between inherited genes, mutations and any complication that happened during pregnancy or early childhood. Twin studies, on which any estimate of heritability rests on, are, by definition, pure garbage.
>But we have identified the genes associated with these disorders
1. Genes that are associated with these disorders are not necessarily casually linked to them. 2. These associations are rarely reproduced in later studies
3. Different mutations would ideally give rise to different syndromes, begging the question, if many genes are associated with schizophrenia, why bother pretending that it's one disease?
>They're polygenetic.
They're multifactorial. But I'm not comfortable with treating mere constructs as if they constituted actual medical illnesses. A label like schizophrenia hasn't been invented because it accurately describes a thing out there. It's meant to stigmatize, punish and medicalize undesired behavior. That this behavior just so happens to be associated with, for example copper disease (Wilson's) or certain autoimmune disorders, means nothing when it comes to the actual motivation behind the schizophrenia label.

Anonymous No. 16463791

>>16463659
>if many genes are associated with schizophrenia, why bother pretending that it's one disease?
Because all things called schizophrenia have the same symptoms.

Image not available

960x640

Enjoying-the-Sun-....jpg

Anonymous No. 16465321

>>16462821
>I don't understand most fetishes. My "kink/fetish" is if a girl wears a cute costume or something.
I am no expert, but a definite observation is that the latex general over in >>>/s/latex has been going for years, so latex probably relates to ASD. Unlike other fora, that general is about latex comfiness, not all out perversions. Pic. rel.
>I wonder why I am so significantly different from the norm.
Probably Asperger's. And this place is the last, best refuge for people on the spectrum.

Anonymous No. 16467104

>>16460694
So, Depressed and/or Druggie Women are the most fertile.....Proving that they're miserable when they aren't mothers, as we already knew ;)

This is Mother Nature's way getting them off the SSRIs and back in the bedroom. Not being knocked up literally makes them sad. LOL!

Anonymous No. 16467118

>>16463791
>Because all things called schizophrenia have the same symptoms.
No, they don't. Individual presentation is extremely diverse.
Second problem: Pretty much all types of diseases related to the lungs involve coughing as a symptom. That doesn't make them the same.

Anonymous No. 16468487

>>16462601
>possibly with L-Theanine
This is gound in green tea, especially Japanese green tea. Now, if your hypothesis is correct, it would follow that there is a lot less autism in Japan than anywhere else. Is that true?