🗑️ 🧵 Weird patterns in PA voter rolls.
Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 15:55:28 UTC No. 16461033
What is the scientific explanation for there being repeating patterns in the way ID numbers were initially assigned when the PA voter roll system was consolidated from a county system to a statewide system 20 years ago? This data is from the 2020 PA voter roll dated dec 7 2020.
If you bin all the IDs in bins of 10,000 and count dem/rep/other/voters with history/voters without history/most represented county in bin, you end up with repeating patterns of republican vs democrat in the two largest counties and general patterns in most counties that I feel shouldn’t develop in voters without history. It would seem that somehow the creation of the patterns especially in voters without history would have taken some kind of foreknowledge that these people would never vote. It seems like some kind of algo was used to assign IDs and maybe indexed fake voters or something so you wouldn’t have to keep a list of IDs. It is also suspicious that the patterns are obvious in the two largest counties as if the algo had to repeat. After Philly the statewide system starts so it seems more random how you would expect the whole thing to be.
Link to spreadsheet:
https://files.catbox.moe/fdq4lk.ods
Link to video trying to explain spreadsheet:
https://files.catbox.moe/n4h5nd.mp4
Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 02:52:57 UTC No. 16461706
>>16461033
oy vey delete this thread now!
🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 15:39:21 UTC No. 16462233
Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 21:24:13 UTC No. 16462699
>>16461509
>Pennsylvania
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kids_
Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 02:47:35 UTC No. 16463051
>>16461033
I have no idea what you're talking about but is it as simple as "People who had never voted before 2003 probably didn't vote after that either"?
Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 03:47:42 UTC No. 16463129
>>16463051
I don't think it could be that simple. The problem is how did they know to add them in that pattern and that they would never vote. 20 years later that pattern holds. I just don't see how the patterns could persist so perfectly. It isn't just a block of no history voters it is like a gradual increase. So even if they never voted in the years before it still wouldn't make sense that the gradual increase is so perfect. For whatever reason they increased the number of no history voters with some algo to maybe mix them in with the voters with history. It seems when the system was initialized everyone started with no history. I feel like it should be pretty much random but it clearly isn't.
It is hard to imagine that they would somehow keep a bunch of fake voters on the roll and indexed them with an algo but on the other hand it would be the best way to hide them especially if the system uses the same algo to vote but then doesn't modify their history so they never have history and you wouldn't have to keep a list of IDs. I feel like someone would have noticed this by now but who knows.