Image not available

1080x1894

Xbxjnc.jpg

🗑️ 🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16462519

Why evolutionary women are so boring and robotic? Why didn't evolution make them more interesting and etc? What is reproductive reason?

Image not available

300x294

141841321.jpg

Anonymous No. 16462527

try thinking about it for longer than 15 seconds. it's the most answered evolutionary question in the world.

Anonymous No. 16462594

>>16462519
Because the don't need to be smart or interesting to reproduce, they just need to be tolerable long enough to take a dick. Or at least hold still while getting raped.

Anonymous No. 16463147

>>16462527
So what is your 15 second answer?

Image not available

1080x2244

Screenshot_202411....jpg

Anonymous No. 16463155

What's evolutionary reason for Chads to be republicans

Anonymous No. 16463160

you wouldn’t ask ‘why do babies sit around like loafs of floop doin’ heckin’ nothing all day?’ would you? you probably wouldn’t ask ‘why does kitty meow and dogo bark and pongo monke?’ either. women just are; you probably haven’t been around many if you’re genuinely asking why they are robotic. women have not evolved to be creative like men—they have evolved to be mothers and caregivers. creativity has evolutionary benefits for men and almost exclusively us. it allows us to solve complex problems, survive, and deal with the loneliness of masculinity. can a woman be creative? sure, but bonobos can be trained to perform neat little tricks, too. there are always outliers. sometimes smart monke, sometimes high iq creative woman. vast majority of monke are just monke though, and the same is true for women.

tldr: women do not require creativity to be caregivers, but men do in order to hunt/kill/outfox predators

Anonymous No. 16463206

>>16463160
>they have evolved to be mothers and caregivers
the total collapse in birth rates the nanosecond you educate women means this is false
turns out being a mother is pretty much the worst thing that could ever happen to a woman

Anonymous No. 16463256

>>16463206
i think it has actually proven the opposite. they have shown that education is counter to their nature. not only has educating women destroyed our universities, but it has also created category after category of ‘pointless’ jobs (ones machines can replicate). now women are ‘waking up’ and running back to the home. i personally know three career women who’ve gotten married and quit for good within weeks of their ceremony to raise families.

Anonymous No. 16463275

>>16462519
This is truth ever since I gave up on dating,clubbing and hooking up shits I've been more happier,normalistic and hardcore health,philosophy books and vidya lover

Anonymous No. 16463587

>>16463155
those with superior features know they can win competitions, and the red party has the social narrative that it encourages fair competition.

Image not available

480x360

neat.gif

Anonymous No. 16463599

Anonymous No. 16463601

>>16462519
>implying men are interesting
fuck you 95% of human beings are boring as shit, you and me probably included. It has very little to do with gender. At least women have a vagina to compensate for it. What do you have? A hair fucking ballsack that's what.

Anonymous No. 16463654

>>16463601
I would say 95% of women are boring, but only 80% of men are actually boring in my experience. But no one actually called me boring before because I can do communication routine with anyone

Anonymous No. 16463910

Noone has presented any argument.

Image not available

600x800

1730825264427081.jpg

Anonymous No. 16463926

>>16462519
>>16462594
>>16463155
>of the first five posts, three are riddled with grammar and syntax mistakes
>this is considered normal on /sci/ndia in 2024
>>16463910
Get off my board, dalit benchod

Anonymous No. 16463932

>>16463926
Still not an argument, seething incel.

Image not available

600x424

746850286-PotKett....jpg

Anonymous No. 16463976

>>16463932
>incel