🗑️ 🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Wed, 6 Nov 2024 15:37:02 UTC No. 16465005
What is the statistical probability that the massive 20% spike in votes count in 2020 was fake and the result of ballot box stuffing? How would one calculate that? Since its extremely large number statistics with an enormous sample size it seems like it should be possible to come up with a fairly conclusive result.
Anonymous at Wed, 6 Nov 2024 15:53:48 UTC No. 16465031
COVID happened.
Anonymous at Wed, 6 Nov 2024 15:55:28 UTC No. 16465033
>>16465031
COVID didn't happening. It was an NPC parto, acted out to reduce the strain of the three body problem that contains me.
Anonymous at Wed, 6 Nov 2024 15:56:14 UTC No. 16465034
>>16465005
That's not how statistics work. Use your head before making your next post, thanks.
Anonymous at Wed, 6 Nov 2024 16:03:10 UTC No. 16465042
>>16465036
What exactly is it supposed to make obvious? Other than your retardation, that is.
Anonymous at Wed, 6 Nov 2024 16:29:19 UTC No. 16465064
>>16465005
Don't think science or statistics are going to explain it. From what I saw, the use of mail-in ballots across the country presented Democrats with a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to "assist" voters with voting.
How it worked here in Centennial Place was a volunteer would come to each and every door to check if every person eligible to vote was registered. If they found anyone living there that wasn't registered, they'd register them on the spot. This is perfectly legal. They also "helped" everyone to fill out a request for a mail-in ballot and then delivered those requests to county elections office. They knew when the county mailed out ballots for each individual and what day the ballot likely would arrive in the mail. On that day, a volunteer would visit the voter, ensure they went to the mailbox to get the ballot, and would offer to assist them with filling out the ballot. This is perfectly legal if the voter for some reason can't fill out the ballot themselves. There was no enforcement on this so most people in Techwood had someone filling out their ballot for them but they were all going to vote Democrat anyway (this is social housing). The volunteer would then take the ballot to the county election office's drop box. They'd do these in large batches, which is what you sometimes saw on videos. These were all legal ballots and the process was more or less legal, especially given the circumstances of the pandemic.
The result is that millions of people who normally wouldn't bother with the hassle of voting were walked through the process every step of the way. With the pandemic over, many of the temporary rules that allowed this kind of thing were repealed and new rules and laws put in place to make similar types of ballot harvesting difficult or illegal.
Anonymous at Wed, 6 Nov 2024 16:55:29 UTC No. 16465093
>>16465042
Unironically filtered
Anonymous at Wed, 6 Nov 2024 18:55:08 UTC No. 16465224
>>16465085
hoping trump puts elon, the 215iq data autist, on this task force
Anonymous at Wed, 6 Nov 2024 19:08:10 UTC No. 16465248
>>16465085
Cherrypicking. Or did the Reps cheat in 2016?
Bexar, TX
Buncombe, NC
Centre, PA
Clackamas, OR
DeKalb, IL
Merced, CA
San Bernardino, CA
San Joaquin, CA
Skagit, WA
Stanislaus, CA
Sandoval, NM
Ventura, CA
Will, IL
Winnebago, IL
Anonymous at Wed, 6 Nov 2024 19:09:46 UTC No. 16465250
>>16465054
>implying CA, IL, OR, WA wouldn't always go blue
I think your causality is backwards
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Nov 2024 00:49:11 UTC No. 16465527
>>16465250
Welcome to Year Zero, the start of history.
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Nov 2024 00:59:25 UTC No. 16465537
>>16465036
it's like a big middle finger pointing at you
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Nov 2024 03:23:08 UTC No. 16465668
>>16465527
>in 1988, Cali went red
>therefore in 2024, Cali would have gone red if not for...something
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Nov 2024 04:46:33 UTC No. 16465721
>>16465005
You would have to calculate the "P-Value", which describes how likely it is that your data would have occurred by random chance (i.e., that the null hypothesis is true).
I haven't done it since school, but any IRL Stats Fag can calculate it with ease, I should think.
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Nov 2024 06:24:55 UTC No. 16465786
>>16465005
The official explanation is that spamming the country with unsolicited mailin ballots (safe and secure :^) ) plus Trump backlash (despite him getting 12M more votes than '16) plus the unfathomable, inspirational charisma and wit of Joe Biden led to massive turnout, followed by a reversion to the mean which somehow *only* affected the democratic party candidate.
>>16465031
Chart's a bit misleading. California and some other retard states need weeks to do what other states do in hours so when it's all over Trump will hit his 2020 number and Kamala will close the gap some.
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Nov 2024 06:26:23 UTC No. 16465788
>>16465036
So democrats cheated when they were not in power but suddenly didn't cheat when they were in power and rebuplicans cheated in both 2020 and 2024?
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Nov 2024 06:29:53 UTC No. 16465790
>>16465788
>suddenly didn't cheat when they were in power
Increased scrutiny plus Joe's revenge.
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Nov 2024 06:32:04 UTC No. 16465792
>>16465790
A predictable response but you should read some popper and learn what an 'unfalsifiable hypothesis' is (assuming you know how to read)
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Nov 2024 06:37:21 UTC No. 16465795
>>16465792
>appeal to authority
Claiming the most suspicious election since at least 1960 is Totally Legit Guys We Swear is also "unfalsifiable" considering anyone trying to falsify it gets stonewalled, censored, and even imprisoned.
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Nov 2024 06:41:04 UTC No. 16465799
>>16465790
Also Kamala pissed away all her money on celebrity shit and ads instead of ballot harvesting.
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Nov 2024 06:44:49 UTC No. 16465801
>>16465795
Yes, yes, just like how big astronomy is censoring astrology blah blah.
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Nov 2024 06:50:53 UTC No. 16465807
>>16465801
How many people got banned from social media or throw in jail for astrology?
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Nov 2024 06:54:57 UTC No. 16465812
>>16465807
Who was jailed for """investigating""" the 2020 election? Are you stupid? The only people who were jailed were maga terrorists who invaded a government building.
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Nov 2024 06:58:20 UTC No. 16465816
>>16465812
>maga terrorists who invaded a government building
For a second I thought I was talking to someone who wasn't insane. My bad.
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Nov 2024 07:02:23 UTC No. 16465819
>>16465816
>"they're not terrorists becuz they were white!!!"
Lmao
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Nov 2024 07:04:24 UTC No. 16465821
>>16465819
That was really the best you could come up with?
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Nov 2024 07:05:24 UTC No. 16465822
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Nov 2024 07:10:32 UTC No. 16465825
>>16465821
It's hilarious how 65iq magas like you keep falling for the dumbest possible fake news
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ei
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Nov 2024 07:14:49 UTC No. 16465831
>>16465822
No one's talking about those Mostly Peaceful Protesters, though even they aren't "terrorists".
https://apnews.com/article/capitol-
https://trib247.com/articles/i-m-re
>>16465825
Are you really trying to deboonk this with "The defendants' boss says they dindu nuffin"?
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Nov 2024 07:18:28 UTC No. 16465836
>>16465831
>Are you really trying to deboonk this with "The defendants' boss says they dindu nuffin"?
Someone should study your brain rot