🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Nov 2024 14:28:23 UTC No. 16466018
Are attractive people more intelligent?
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Nov 2024 14:40:50 UTC No. 16466026
The problem is not pretending to be someone you’re not. But pretending someone else is something that they are not.
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Nov 2024 14:41:05 UTC No. 16466027
>>16466018
the opposite
their intelligence leads to behavior that seems unattractive
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Nov 2024 14:49:27 UTC No. 16466029
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Nov 2024 14:54:33 UTC No. 16466032
>>16466018
Yes. Good genes usually come in full package.
Nature doesn't care about being fair.
There are exceptions of course.
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Nov 2024 14:55:30 UTC No. 16466034
>>16466018
The literature suggests that the two are positively correlated (r=.381).
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Nov 2024 15:12:08 UTC No. 16466045
>>16466018
The perfect mouse society pretty much shows that the ideal specimen of the species is socially and mentally retarded. They might look pretty, but they spend all their time grooming themselves and trying to look as physically good as possible. These are not intelligent traits. It also shows that females will only breed with top males and ignore all the others. Even under extreme competition. Yes, they are just retarded mice but it's crazy to see how much they reflect human society.
Pretty people are the most insecure people alive. They put most of their self worth on their looks and once they start to age, their self worth goes down as their looks begin to fade. You would think that beautiful woman would be extremely confident but she is scared shitless of not being the prettiest in the room. Every blemish, pimple, wrinkle, whatever tears them down as it's seen as an imperfection. Average people don't care about these things as much, so they put values into other subjects. Like hobbies, work, or academics.
This isn't always the case, there are always outliers. Pic related is one of the most beautiful girls I have ever seen and she is an incredible artist. Most artists do not look like this, trust me I am one of them and the entertainment industry is incredibly small so I know a lot of other artists. We are all very average looking for the most part.
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Nov 2024 15:18:12 UTC No. 16466049
>>16466045
that's a mid
Also
>They put most of their self worth on their looks
If you've ever been mired and treated differently because of your looks you'd understand
I was a straight As student in hs and college from a good family but the validation you get from your looks is just different and kinda addictive
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Nov 2024 15:41:12 UTC No. 16466076
>>16466018
They appear to be because of the halo effect, not sure if there is any objective correlation
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Nov 2024 16:37:12 UTC No. 16466154
>>16466018
>which races are the least intelligent
Aborginies, sub-saharan Africans
>ugliest races
Aborginies, sub-saharan Africans
>which race is responsible for 90% of scientific progress, technology, mathematics etc.
Europeans
>most attractive race
Europeans
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Nov 2024 18:03:08 UTC No. 16466209
>>16466154
>>most attractive race
I love me some asian girls anon. Also Ana de Armas.
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Nov 2024 19:21:50 UTC No. 16466293
In my epxierence, it's the opposite lol. Attractive people tend to be dumb and smart people tend not to be the beat looking. Funny how that works out.
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Nov 2024 19:32:57 UTC No. 16466308
>>16466293
>the science board using anecdotal evidence
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Nov 2024 20:00:34 UTC No. 16466340
Gio Scotti.
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Nov 2024 20:07:41 UTC No. 16466351
>>16466018
No, Chad and Stacy are not even fully human, let alone intelligent. They lack consciousness, which is an emergent property of struggle. There is literally no-one "at home" behind their eyes. If you have always had everything handed to you on a silver plate then you're doomed to be an NPC sleep-walking through like.
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Nov 2024 20:08:42 UTC No. 16466353
>>16466351
*life
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Nov 2024 20:11:31 UTC No. 16466357
>>16466045
She's kinda ugly though.
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Nov 2024 20:51:40 UTC No. 16466403
>>16466018
>is [dumb shit I just pulled out of my ass] true?
No.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articl
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Nov 2024 21:16:36 UTC No. 16466433
>>16466403
>The first group included eight judges (4 female, 4 male) who assigned Attractiveness ratings (1 = low attractiveness, 7 = high attractiveness) in the subset of LTS participants who had posed for photographs before mid-2010 (n = 228)
>The second group comprised 15 judges (9 female, 6 male) who rated LTS participants who had posed for photographs between mid-2010 and 2012 (n = 171)
Doesn't the large sample size get kinda invalidated if your pool of people who judge attractiveness is so small?
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Nov 2024 22:46:33 UTC No. 16466545
>>16466018
usually yes, also healthier in every way but dont need to put that intelligence to use. Really 95% of jobs could be done by anyone with an IQ over 70, this is why black people perform jobs at a level that is much better than what you would guess based on their IQ. Be it physical blue collar labor or office labor. The effect of a high intelligence only matters for high IQ jobs like lawyer or CEO
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Nov 2024 23:14:42 UTC No. 16466564
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Nov 2024 23:15:31 UTC No. 16466566
>>16466034
>r=.381
social “science” is such a meme kek
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Nov 2024 23:19:19 UTC No. 16466568
>>16466045
You call that mongoloid beautiful? I know chinks are supposed to look like that but she still looks like she has down syndrome
Anonymous at Fri, 8 Nov 2024 00:06:24 UTC No. 16466600
>>16466045
>Hebrew necklace
raphael at Fri, 8 Nov 2024 01:36:26 UTC No. 16466663
>>16466034
link study
Anonymous at Fri, 8 Nov 2024 03:43:26 UTC No. 16466754
https://www.econstor.eu/handle/1041
>Common wisdom suggests that beauty helps in the labor market (...) controlling for cognitive ability negates the premium for all occupations except sex workers, a point further underscored by the similarity of the beauty effect on earnings and productivity. The second factor implies a positive link, perhaps genetic, between beauty and intelligence
>To obtain these results we collect 1,159 estimates of the effect of beauty on earnings or productivity reported in 67 studies
Anonymous at Fri, 8 Nov 2024 08:34:30 UTC No. 16466934
>>16466018
Yes, both mean you probably don't have fucked up mutations, so being good looking and smart go hand in hand.
Anonymous at Fri, 8 Nov 2024 08:40:38 UTC No. 16466938
Usually but not always. Good genetics usually provide good health overall, but not always. There are ugly smart people, and attractive dumb people. But usually they go hand in hand.
The real thing though is that unattractive but intelligent people quickly realize that they need to compensate somehow in order to attract a partner, while attractive people are more likely to be complacent because not much effort is required.
Anonymous at Fri, 8 Nov 2024 11:19:33 UTC No. 16467007
>>16466018
Beautiful people are more often in midwit terrain, while ugly and mid people are more often either completely stupid or intelligent. Racial theories are good and all but looking at high IQ people like politicians, doctors, engineers or scientists and most often they just look ugly despite being whatever race. Good looks are meant to bias you into thinking an individual has innate general qualities, nothing more.
Anonymous at Fri, 8 Nov 2024 11:46:38 UTC No. 16467033
>>16466045
look like some titty’s I suck on last week
you aren’t in the Chicago area are you?
Anonymous at Fri, 8 Nov 2024 12:20:07 UTC No. 16467049
>>16466045
If you are talking about the rockefeller foundation hoax, that was no perfect society, they spent so much time grooming themselves because no entertainment was provided, they just forced a bunch of mice together in a cage, no wheels or toys or ways to burrow into the ground or build their typical nests or do any of their natural habits like they evolved to do in the wild.
Anonymous at Fri, 8 Nov 2024 12:23:29 UTC No. 16467052
>>16467007
>. Good looks are meant to bias you into thinking an individual has innate general qualities,
Lack of mutations? Successful parents?
Women like to marry rich men so if rich=smart then beauty will correlate with wealth and smartness
Anonymous at Fri, 8 Nov 2024 12:31:38 UTC No. 16467059
Anonymous at Fri, 8 Nov 2024 12:36:35 UTC No. 16467063
>>16466018
Generally, yes. "Attractiveness" is just physical fitness and symmetry. Chances are if you look above average/ "good" on the outside, you look "good" on the inside and have above average brain health and function, as well. It's annoying but the rich, good looking, athletic kid is probably smarter than you too. "When it rains it pours."
Anonymous at Fri, 8 Nov 2024 12:39:56 UTC No. 16467065
>>16466018
No that is pure low IQ incel cope.
Anonymous at Fri, 8 Nov 2024 12:47:09 UTC No. 16467069
>>16467059
Its all baked in
Sons of beautiful women and rich dads will also be wealthy and beautiful. It just self-reinforces by marrying into wealth and beauty, and rejecting those who fail. Hence how even the best families have "black sheep", loser cousins and uncles that get barely tolerated and are basically expelled from the family
Anonymous at Fri, 8 Nov 2024 12:56:52 UTC No. 16467086
>>16467069
>there is no strong evidence demonstating that men and women engage in a marriage tradeoff between physical attractiveness and earning prospects
Did you read what it said?
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/ab
"I use data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health Romantic Pair Sample, a large (N = 1,507), nationally representative probability sample of dating, cohabiting, and married couples, to investigate how often romantic partners exchange physical attractiveness and socioeconomic status, net of matching on these traits. I find that controlling for matching eliminates nearly all evidence of beauty-status exchange"
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/ab
"we collect and analyze the data from the five waves of the China Family Panel Studies (2010–2018) on beauty–status exchanges and other forms of marriage exchanges in China. We found little evidence of beauty–status exchanges in Chinese marriages and even the well-assumed exchange of “woman's beauty for man's talent” lacks sound empirical support. "
Anonymous at Fri, 8 Nov 2024 12:57:09 UTC No. 16467087
>>16466018
social status is THE midwit trap
Anonymous at Fri, 8 Nov 2024 13:02:01 UTC No. 16467091
>>16467086
>Did you read what it said?
Yes, beauty marries beauty, but that is simply enmeshed with intelligence. Its not like some beautiful person just pops up, to be beautiful you need to have beautiful parents that most likely will have been wealthy.
So rich=beauty
Marrying the rich is the same as marrying the beautiful
Anonymous at Fri, 8 Nov 2024 13:54:04 UTC No. 16467144
>>16466032
Kek and people who advanced math and physics were all 10/10 chads right?
Anonymous at Fri, 8 Nov 2024 14:10:56 UTC No. 16467163
>>16466045
>The perfect mouse society
Which one? The 30 times that no population collapse occurred, or the single time it did?
You mean the one where inbred lab mice were used, or wild type mice?
You did check the mice didn't have a transmittable disease right?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEw
Anonymous at Fri, 8 Nov 2024 14:11:57 UTC No. 16467166
Anonymous at Fri, 8 Nov 2024 14:34:12 UTC No. 16467176
>>16466663
For no logical reason, /sci/ believes that publication archive links are spam.
But if I can find the studies, then you can too.
Anonymous at Fri, 8 Nov 2024 21:02:15 UTC No. 16467550
>>16466018
I remember molymeme made a video about the subject. Apparently both men and women from the "attractive group" had around 12 IQ points higher on average than the "unattractive group". Dont remember the study tho so he might be talking out of his ass.
🗑️ Anonymous at Fri, 8 Nov 2024 21:09:55 UTC No. 16467557
>>16467499
That's a nice dumper.
🗑️ Anonymous at Fri, 8 Nov 2024 21:17:00 UTC No. 16467569
>>16467144
No.
They're those exceptions I was talking about - highly intelligent but sexually undesirable.
They were to ugly/autistic to lead a meaningful life (have wife, children, accumulate wealth) so they used their IQ to excel in other area of life that isn't as judgmental about superficial things - academia.
Anonymous at Fri, 8 Nov 2024 22:30:49 UTC No. 16467645
>>16467144
>advanced math and physics
Why would you go into those fields when you can go into medicine or a top tier business or law school
Anonymous at Fri, 8 Nov 2024 23:11:17 UTC No. 16467681
>>16467144
Correct, and its also no coincidence that the people who produce fraudulent goyslop like dark matter and relativity are repulsively ugly.
Anonymous at Fri, 8 Nov 2024 23:24:53 UTC No. 16467708
>>16466018
I keep reading that's the case but every smart person I know is below average looking
Maybe pretty people are a different kind of smart or so smart they behave much more differently or they are smart but have different interests
Maybe attractiveness correlates more with personality
Anonymous at Sat, 9 Nov 2024 00:37:51 UTC No. 16467796
Anonymous at Sat, 9 Nov 2024 13:24:49 UTC No. 16468250
>>16467176
you could just upload the paper, /sci/ allows pdf. or quote the title
Anonymous at Sat, 9 Nov 2024 13:28:13 UTC No. 16468251
>>16467708
I only know one smart person, a woman and shes very pretty. I dont know any other smart women, and no smart men
I mean, remarkably smart, everyone i know is either normal or dumb
Anonymous at Sat, 9 Nov 2024 14:29:21 UTC No. 16468292
>>16467163
Inbred Mice are used in literally every scientific experiment. They are unflawed specimens and inbreeding doesn't affect the like it does to other animals. Most cats, especially larger ones like cheetahs are deeply inbred and show no negative side effects. You know literally nothing on the subject.
Anonymous at Sat, 9 Nov 2024 14:36:54 UTC No. 16468300
>>16468250
When /sci/ allows URL's you will be able to download original documents rather than "trust me, bro, original pdf attached".
You can search the headline too and find the same articles that I found. The Internet is not hard.
Pro-tip: Add "r=0.381" if you want.
Anonymous at Sat, 9 Nov 2024 18:33:57 UTC No. 16468495
>>16466026
I disagree that the first isn't a problem, IT IS a problem. And the latter is an even bigger, schizophrenic problem.
Anonymous at Sat, 9 Nov 2024 18:51:10 UTC No. 16468525
>>16466018
Yes. Intelligence is a genetic trait passed down by fathers and intelligent males only mate with attractive females. Female intelligence doesn't matter and is almost certainly a negative.
Anonymous at Sat, 9 Nov 2024 19:29:15 UTC No. 16468581
>>16467499
she thick yo
Anonymous at Mon, 11 Nov 2024 00:45:20 UTC No. 16470185
>>16466018
Nope, but they have better chances to be. Less mental complexes.
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Nov 2024 06:42:08 UTC No. 16471725
>>16466018
Nice
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Nov 2024 10:57:04 UTC No. 16471835
>>16466045
t. just trust me bro
not a single syllable of value here, much less any counterpoints to whatever retarded concepts you're alluding to
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Nov 2024 17:08:13 UTC No. 16472088
>>16471835
>attractive people put so much worth on their appearance that it becomes the most important thing to them, over everything else
>durr I don't understand
You're an absolute fucking retard. And I never said we were directly 1:1 to the mice, just that it's funny how many similarities we see in society. Clearly, we are more complicated than fucking mice.
I'm surrounded by midwits.
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Nov 2024 18:18:48 UTC No. 16472194
>>16472088
>>attractive people put so much worth on their appearance that it becomes the most important thing to them, over everything else
That doesnt mean they are dumber
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Nov 2024 02:32:07 UTC No. 16472759
>>16466026
People are less equal than they say but more equal than they think.
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Nov 2024 06:40:09 UTC No. 16474430
>>16466018
My theory is that attractive people receive much more attention from others and that constant level of forced socialization is good for brain development.
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Nov 2024 08:00:25 UTC No. 16474475
>>16466018
yes, attractiveness is a sign of health and healthy people are more intelligent
don't listen to out of shape spiritualist who separate mind and body, there is no mind or soul or whatever that exists by itself, it is all part of the body, every single person itt would be more intelligent if they got in shape, ate healthy and exercised more