Image not available

900x900

IMG_8838.jpg

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16467303

>is right on everything
your response?

Anonymous No. 16467304

>>16467303
>your response?
Kneel

Anonymous No. 16467389

>>16467303
>autist deboonks regular conversation by hyper analyzing every syllable

Anonymous No. 16467402

>>16467303
Sabine is the more likable autist.

Anonymous No. 16467408

I'm rooting for Sabine she will body this steamer

🗑️ Anonymous No. 16467420

>>16467303
Can this guy have enough IQ to contribute to STEM by doing anything other than debunking the flat earth theory

Anonymous No. 16467423

>>16467408
She already did

Anonymous No. 16467455

>>16467303
he always wins and I want to be on the winner side

Anonymous No. 16467456

>>16467303
>your response?
buy an ad

Anonymous No. 16467464

Is science dieing?

Image not available

850x400

TeslaJewQuote.jpg

bodhi No. 16467647

>>16467303

Anonymous No. 16467651

>>16467303
I feel personally attacked by this question

Anonymous No. 16467672

>dunks on a woman in trumps america

Anonymous No. 16467673

>>16467303
I'd like to see this pathetic fuck try to debunk Wildberger

Anonymous No. 16467675

>>16467673
He's right about everything and he wouldn't have anything to say about Wildberger because he stays in his lane and talks about what he knows about, i.e. mathematics. Wildberger is specific about his subject area and doesn't attack science as a whole and doesn't pander to science deniers unlike Sabine. Dave was right to call her out. There's nothing to call out for wildberger.

Anonymous No. 16467732

>>16467303
>The establishment is wrong
>Actually, the establishment is right
>source: the establishment

Anonymous No. 16467736

>>16467732
Idiot.

Anonymous No. 16467742

>>16467732
>source: the establishment shill

Anonymous No. 16467773

>>16467303
It's incredible how he can be completely and inarguably correct during the course of a 30 minute long video whilst still managing to be utterly unlikable at a fundamental level.

Anonymous No. 16468131

>>16467773
He's extremely likeable.

Image not available

734x499

real agenda.png

Anonymous No. 16468144

>>16467303
>what he says isn't his real agenda

Anonymous No. 16468145

>>16467303
if sci hates someone. they're probably doing something right

Anonymous No. 16468167

>>16467673
all his videos are gone and even when they weren't he only got a few thousand views by other schizos. not worth addressing

Image not available

890x962

IMG_4054.jpg

Anonymous No. 16468336

Buy an ad

Anonymous No. 16468354

>>16468131
t. Dave

Anonymous No. 16468397

>>16467773
>>16468131
Why does he pretend to be a professor?

Anonymous No. 16468400

>>16467402
>>16467408
>>16467773

He's way more listenable than Sabine. Sabines voice irks me.

Anonymous No. 16468403

>>16467303
I analyzed this beef and concluded that Sabine is trying to cash in by turning people into ignorant christcucks, and this Professor Dave guy is like reddit Richard Dawkins.

Image not available

1897x990

sabine_no.jpg

Anonymous No. 16468406

His response?

Anonymous No. 16468408

>>16468400
Incorrect. SH has many more popular videos, while not-professor Dave only gets clickbait titles for the reddit retards who need hours of flerf content in their life.

Anonymous No. 16468422

>>16467303
i listened to his video on sabine with a very open mind
but his argument was
>she is bad for our optics
oh ok then

Anonymous No. 16468457

>>16468422
>our optics
This is such a funny thing for the science communicator pseud-class. Nothing like a non-professor with the flimsiest gain on stolen valor imaginable pretending like a youtube is the voice of the science. Shit didn't work for comrade Fauci, it aint finna work for him.

Image not available

666x832

soyience.jpg

Anonymous No. 16468491

>>16467303
>your response?
support science!

Anonymous No. 16468594

>>16467303
i watched his video yesterday so i don't remember everything. i recall him having a flaw in his communication though. he claims something like 1-2% of papers failed to replicate, then concluded that this implies 1-2% of researchers are responsible for publishing these. if i'm remembering his argument correctly, this is flawed

Anonymous No. 16468607

All the morons here blabbering about their "muh soience" science denial are precisely the people that Dave is talking about, and who Sabine unwittingly ponders to.
Protip, retards: Sabine is vaccinated with the covid mRNA vaccine and has multiple boosters. She does not deny man made global warming and puts out multiple videos saying it's a real problem and we need a carbon tax and to shut down fossil fuels. When she says science has problems, she is talking about particle physicists taking a large percentage of the grant money.
Dave is right on the money about her clickbait videos.

Anonymous No. 16468610

>>16468607
>mischaracterizes whole thread
>straw mans all opinions
>doesn't event refute strawman
>lunges into blind support of a youtuber
No updoots here. Your not-professor is a grifter who exclusively panders to clickbait.

Anonymous No. 16468618

>>16468607
sabine specifically says the problems underpinning particle physics unpin all of science today. when men can get pregnant, nsf funds to mathematics based research required DEI focuses, and scientists who get rejected from positions (like post-doc research and tenure track faculty line) require a whole paragraph of why they aren't being rejected based on DEI reasons, science has failed. this is all of scientific disciplines btw. not-a-professor dave hides behind niche advances in ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY (not science, btw -- insofar that they aren't funded in the same way science is) he exposes his own ignorance about science.

Anonymous No. 16468756

>>16467303
>muh vaccines that didn't work actually worked chud you are all conspiracy theorists
>muh fascism
>trump le bad ass-pull
>gender doesn't exist except when its transgender then it does
>does not address any issues with academics and scientific research except saying "I'm not saying it all perfect"
>the whole 30 min seething can be shortened to a "you used the word "science" in your thumbnails instead of using "theoretical physics"
>a jew
woah, so true

Anonymous No. 16468761

>>16467303
he's a midwit, and I don't use that term lightly. He went to a mid university, didn't even do a masters, I am more qualified than this guy. He explains and teaches everything on a Highschool level like it's fact. Most of what he says is therefore objectively wrong.

Anonymous No. 16468765

>>16468610
>>16468618
>>16468756
>>16468761
All these posts prove my point
Farina isn't jewish btw.

Anonymous No. 16468768

>>16468765
>didn't have enough (You)s so just started mass replying
alright, attention deprived fag, what's your point?

Anonymous No. 16468782

>>16468756
He has also shilled for circumcision.

Image not available

1117x628

file.png

Anonymous No. 16468809

>>16467303
it is official now, the maximum amount of time a pozzer can survive without seething about drumpf is 26 minutes 50 seconds

Image not available

980x766

Screenshot_202411....jpg

🗑️ Anonymous No. 16468858

>>16468761
Reminds me of this meme

Anonymous No. 16469069

>>16467303
>>is right on everything
>calls himself professor but isn't a professor
Literally his name is not even right

Anonymous No. 16469351

>>16467303
He looks like a typical smelly skinnyfat Redditor faglenial. I can't take him seriously, just a blind sheeple believing in scoicence, no different than Abrahamic cattle.

Also. He admitted he doesn't know shit. He also buys into the whole trans bullshit.
https://youtu.be/fpGqFUStcxc?si=CA2ATqyKZFo1CQOZ

Anonymous No. 16469362

>>16469351
aww little chudcel is mad not everyone fits in his little predefined boxes. trans people are very real and always have been, not sorry incel.

Anonymous No. 16469367

>>16469362
I don't even care about your amerigolem made up terms, you dumb subhuman.

bodhi No. 16469368

>>16469362
there is no such thing as "trans." you are a mentally ill man in a dress

Anonymous No. 16469444

>>16469362
>aww little chudcel is mad not everyone fits in his little predefined boxes.
>Predefined boxes
>Chudcel
>trans people
> incel
I know you're trying to troll, but there's high IQ trolling and low IQ trolling. You displayed low IQ trolling by not understanding how you contradicted yourself..

Anonymous No. 16469449

>>16469351
Did he disable comments for that video

Anonymous No. 16469507

>>16468397
Manifestation.

Anonymous No. 16469514

>>16467303
Sabine destroyed him by pointing out that only an idiot would deny existing problems within science just because an anti-science populist points it out.

Facts are facts, regardless of who benefits from it.

Anonymous No. 16469539

>>16469449
He better do because it is a bad video from a trans community perspective. He is basically saying tranies are mentally ill 0.001% of a population. It is an outdated standpoint and was used a decade ago in order to invoke pity feelings in normalfags, like "please let us do gay orgy parties we're just mentally ill uwu".

The modern meta is that "gender" is a completely artificially fabricated social construct which was fabricated by evil white people empire around 19th-20th century, therefore, should be ignored completely. And before Yakub created "Wypipo Evil Inc" transpeople were actually not just fully integrated into society, but were praised as demigods for the ability to morph and combine feminine and masculine characteristics and for having spiritual superpowers. This discovery was based on the fact that in ancient Japan they sometimes dressed little boys in geisha attires and used them as sex slaves(I'm not trolling, this is the official transpeople lore).

Also the biological "sex" does not define anything either actually. It is completely random biological mutation without any coherent purpose. Penis doesn't bleed once a month not because it is not suppose to, but because it can but decides not to. But if a transwoman decided to bleed out of her girl-penis, it is valid and very important.

But also keep in mind that everything mentioned above is easily ignored if it is convenient for a trans person because at the end of the day they are oppressed and they should decide what is true and what is not. As an example: vagina doesn't mean you are a woman, but we should let pre-pubescent kids cut their genitals and make fake vaginas because otherwise they are gonna kill themselves. Because vagina means you are a woman.

Anonymous No. 16469543

This guy has one of the most slappable faces I've ever seen
>>16468607
I'm on of these and I'm a postdoc. This whole thing is just a ridiculous beef between two crazy youtube grifters (for different reasons) anyway.

Anonymous No. 16469545

>>16468406
the instant I saw that I knew there would be a screenshot of it on 4chan lmao

Anonymous No. 16469548

>>16468145
>>16468607
right on the money
>>16468618
also has a point

Anonymous No. 16469574

>>16467303
>believes covid is real
>right
yeah, no

Anonymous No. 16469575

>>16469548
>Cheerleading and contributing nothing

Anonymous No. 16469581

>>16469539
The freak show has to lead the nation because pedowood is a metroon cult.

Image not available

400x400

1726283831461858.png

Anonymous No. 16469628

>>16469575
Theres little to no contribution to make, the vast majority of people are either with or against something, as for the small fraction that really cares and deliberates about the thing in question they will figure it out by themselves and my input likely wouldn't be pivotal or a deciding factor anyway (also not saying anything is better than saying crap), so yeah

Anonymous No. 16469802

>>16467773
>>16468131
He defended circumsicion, he cannot be likable

Anonymous No. 16469808

>>16469802
Link?

Anonymous No. 16469810

>>16469808
He made original video private, but there is a mra who called that asshole for a debate.(Original video link in a description, but private)
https://youtu.be/eAdL4HDDpmA?si=xM32roGF7HEHVBfJ

Anonymous No. 16469818

>>16469810
Yikes. Defending unconsensual infant genital mutilation is crazy. This definitely changes my opinion of him.

Anonymous No. 16469830

>>16469818
He is a leftist feminazi. Such people definitely use some truthful statements but mix them with their biased leftist agenda.

Anonymous No. 16469854

>>16469351
he tries to take a measured approach on the trans issue, but ultimately ends up appearing crazier than the lefties. his argument that gender roles are socially constructed but that gender identity is not is a self-defeating position. let's observe why:
>trannies have always existed (even in antiquity)
>gender roles are social constructs
>therefore, we should observe in recorded history trannies abiding by the opposite genders role
>this doesn't happen
it's because so-called "gender roles" are actually sex roles, and we evolved to implement a division of labor in accordance to what the physical sexes were capable of performing.

he also misrepresents (via selection bias) the research on puberty blockers. while yes, if you restrict your sample to children who use puberty blockers, the evidence indicates they work. however if you expand your sample to include children who do not use puberty blockers, and undergo puberty normally, they show a much better success rate of curing (not treating!) their gender dysphoria than the kids who troon out. classic case of simpson's paradox. yes, if we say puberty blockers must be used, the conclusion he reaches that they should be used is correct. but if the goal is to successfully treat as many trans youth as possible, the conclusion is to NOT use puberty blockers, and force them to undergo normal puberty.

Anonymous No. 16469960

>>16467303
That moron got owned by a woman, it can not be called human anymore.

Anonymous No. 16471468

>>16467303
>>is right on everything
>your response?

Pierre-Marie Robitaille, who is way out of Dr. Kike's league.

Anonymous No. 16471478

He's not even a real Professor. He's a fraud!

Anonymous No. 16471489

>>16467303
I don't know who MFer is, but he gives me the ick. Hes proly some pervert ass pedofile MFer.

Image not available

300x250

CIQ1T2GUMAEwCBw[1].jpg

Anonymous No. 16471640

this bitch owes his entire "career" to making bottom of the barrel le ebin flat earth debunking videos.

>it's ok though because I acknowledged that in the video

still doesn't take away that you're a clickbaiting faggot like all the rest. also the case can be made that you are platforming antiscience flat earthers. Most people would have no idea who the flat earth experts are but you constantly platform and bring them up. Now they have an entire career teaching antiscience. Great work!

Anonymous No. 16471662

>>16469351
the trans question is the ultimate test. you're either mr. rational science guy or you agree with things you don't understand and make yourself purposely ignorant to appease other people. there is no in between. one is a scientist and the other is a coward.

Anonymous No. 16471690

>>16467303
So is this guy;
A)a sex pest
B)a pedo
c)a tranny/homo
D)scat/zoo/daiper/someother sick fetish
Because you know hes one of these

Anonymous No. 16471697

>>16471690
He's a married man with kids

Anonymous No. 16471699

>>16471468
Dave already debunked Robitaille

Anonymous No. 16471873

>>16471697
being married with kids doesn't disqualify him from being any of the above

Anonymous No. 16471914

>>16468457
That Dave fag's contribution to science is making edutainment on basic undergrad topics, with examples and (terrible) presentation copied straight out of the usual undergrad books. He is basically the embodiment of the term midwit: no serious knowledge in any STEM related field, no research experience but cursory knowledge of 20 STEM fields and a massive concern for how normalfags perceive science, wanting to become the arbiter of science.

Anonymous No. 16471922

>>16468607
>muh optics
people vastly overstate the importance of science communication and especially pop science. Learning math or physics really just boils down to hard work and knowing what books and papers to read, no pop sci channel will replace that.
Sabine is a reprehensible grifter as all she does is complain about the state of physics while actively contributing to no alternative research whatsoever. She's no Peter Woit, who actually does real physics. Even fucking Eric Weinstein has done more on that front. And even with regards to education his community's reading list is unironically good https://theportal.wiki/wiki/Read
Dave Farina is right about her being a grifter yet that doesn't make his videos any better. He should stick to entertaining schizo retards like Mandlbaur, flat earthers or antivaxxers.

Anonymous No. 16471973

>>16468768
My point is that Dave is right about Sabine pandering to dimwitted science denying retards. Look at this thread. Half the anons here hate Dave because he debunked their retarded nonsense, whether it be creationism or electric universe or vaccine denial or whatever, and they're calling him a jew despite Farina not being Jewish and having no Jewish blood at all

Anonymous No. 16472035

>>16471973
>Half the anons here hate Dave because he debunked their retarded nonsense, whether it be creationism or electric universe or vaccine denial or whatever
Schizo seeing posts that don't exist.

Anonymous No. 16472057

this guy literally thinks you need a youtuber pretend professor to gatekeep science to the general public.

Image not available

1929x1032

Screenshot 2024-1....png

Anonymous No. 16472059

>>16472057

Anonymous No. 16472144

>>16472059
So he believes he can speak about scientists experiences which he has no way of confirming, repudiate other scientists experiences because he goes against the zeitgeist and understands how to get grant funding for research? Why does he call himself professor anyway

Anonymous No. 16472151

>>16467303
pretty sure he's just a troll.

Anonymous No. 16472163

>>16472057
There are direct parallels to catholicism here. You must understand that science only talks to a very few people, these people we call prophets of science. Dave is a clergy member under pope Fauci and he is trying to rally ex communicado on sabine hossenfelder for her apostasy. She dares malign the prophets.
It is all quite natural when you come to the privileged perspective.

Anonymous No. 16473141

>>16467303
I thank him for dunking on grifters who prey upon the idiocy of youtube algorithm gooners.

He’s still wrong for being so broadly and vociferously anti-religion. He makes himself look retarded when he dunks on religious people while referring to Peter Kreeft as merely a philosopher, without knowing that Kreeft is rather well-known convert to Catholicism. He did this in his “James Tour Goes to Harvard” video.