Image not available

2000x2000

4981077949190048549.png

๐Ÿงต random thoughts before sleep

Anonymous No. 16468092

>light is the fastest thing in the universe
>we can't reach that other galaxy because the speed of expanding universe is faster than the speed of light
>that meant light is not the fastest thing in the universe
>somehow expanding universe is not a speed
i don't get it

Anonymous No. 16468100

>>16468092
Light is 1 a moving thing.

Two cars driving opposite directions from one another is not 1 moving thing (it's taking the difference between 2 moving things)

Anonymous No. 16468107

>>16468092
Read Stephen Hawking's A Brief History of Time.
Time (and speed) is relative. Understand relativity and you'll understand why both statements are true.

Image not available

710x370

file.png

Anonymous No. 16468183

>>16468092
>the speed of expanding universe is faster than the speed of light
This is likely wrong. You can look it up for a much better explanations for what I could give here. Theory of relativity is confusing, but the lesson from it is that we can't apply our everyday physical intuition on a cosmological scale (just like we can't do it on an elementary particle scale due to quantum mechanics). The next natural question is 'Can we create a theory that explains both the differences from our scale that arise on a macro- and microscales' and it's still an open problem. Most intuitive solutions don't seem to work.

>>16468100
Two photons moving in opposite directions still move at the speed of light wrt each other, so that analogy isn't that good for the situation.

Anonymous No. 16468204

>>16468183
>Two photons moving in opposite directions still move at the speed of light wrt each other, so that analogy isn't that good for the situation.
Wrong. By definition, the relative velocity is the difference of velocities so the relativie velocity HAS to be twice the speed of light

Anonymous No. 16468223

>>16468204
>relative velocity
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relative_velocity#Parallel_velocities

Anonymous No. 16468229

>>16468204
Wrong. The relative velocity of two photons moving in opposite directions is still the speed of light.

What OP is not understanding is that the speed of light isn't changing, that remains the upper limit, but the distance between two points is increasing. It's like driving along a road to reach your destination but someone keeps adding more road, if enough road is added you will never reach your destination no matter how fast you travel.

Anonymous No. 16469010

>>16468229
Put 2 lasers back to back, turn them on, photon travels right at speed of light
Photon travels left at speed of light
Do the math

Anonymous No. 16469024

>>16468183
did you just google and highlight an answer from quora?

Anonymous No. 16469036

>>16468204
Each photon sees the other photon move at c. But they don't see themselves move at all, there entire existence just "is".
Photons see us massies slogging through the Higgs trying to watch them and just laugh.

Anonymous No. 16469056

>>16468229
>let me tell you something we have never witnessed
Nah, I'm good.

Anonymous No. 16469062

>>16468092
Every girl you know (over 16yo) has sucked many MANY dicks.
Ok goodnight.

Anonymous No. 16471336

>>16469024
I used Google and Wikipedia, something which OP and this idiot >>16469010 failed to do. Why would I expend any more effort on them?

Anonymous No. 16472718

>>16468229
>>16469036
You can't create a reference frame moving at the speed of light.

Anonymous No. 16474635

>>16468092
If we could exterminate niggers the world would be a better place

Anonymous No. 16474667

>>16468092
Ponder physics during bouts of insomnia gives you cosmic insights.

>Falling into black hole
>Local time gets slower
>It looks like time speeds up around me
>Space is compressed by the gravity
>It looks like space expands from my point of view
>I fall into the future, which is full of space that seemed to suddenly expand
>I look backwards
>it's the microwave background

Our universe is just the result of something falling into a black hole, it's a fractal witn2jh black holes all the way down.

Anonymous No. 16475096

>>16469010
[math]\frac{\mathrm{c}-(-\mathrm{c})}{1-\frac{\mathrm{c}(-\mathrm{c})}{\mathrm{c}^2}}=\frac{2\mathrm{c}}{2} = \mathrm{c}[/math]