🗑️ 🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sat, 9 Nov 2024 16:10:39 UTC No. 16468368
>Scientifically speaking, [bullshit that has nothing to do with science]
>Politics thread
>Religion thread
>/x/-tier thread
Scientifically speaking, who keeps spamming shitty threads, raiding good ones, making moronic arguments, lacking basic knowledge of reality that any first-year has, and generally trying to turn /sci/ into yet another brainlet & schizo board?
Who stands to gain from ruining /sci/?
Anonymous at Sat, 9 Nov 2024 16:18:35 UTC No. 16468373
>>16468368
>Who stands to gain from ruining /sci/?
/x/ and /pol/. If they can destroy the board that has a long history of debunking their retardation, they'll look more reasonable to newfags.
Anonymous at Sat, 9 Nov 2024 16:19:39 UTC No. 16468375
>>16468368
You ruined /sci/ first with institutional corruption by politics, business and woke ideology. You deserve being haunted by schizos for the rest of your career.
Anonymous at Sat, 9 Nov 2024 16:21:22 UTC No. 16468377
>>16468375
And who exactly do you think I am?
Anonymous at Sat, 9 Nov 2024 16:23:01 UTC No. 16468381
>>16468368
You called us conspiracy theorists. You denigrated our gods with the vilest words. You branded our beliefs as heretical and anti-scientific. And now when the horde of retribution is at your door, you plead ignorance and beg for forgiveness?
Anonymous at Sat, 9 Nov 2024 16:27:26 UTC No. 16468385
>>16468381
The fact is, you are a conspiracy theorist. Your god has no evidence of existence. And you are not a scientist. You are an ideologue here with an agenda to destroy.
Anonymous at Sat, 9 Nov 2024 22:53:32 UTC No. 16468829
>>16468368
>4chan needs to be censored so its more like Reddit
why don't you just use Reddit instead if thats the kind of content you want to see?
Anonymous at Sat, 9 Nov 2024 23:41:33 UTC No. 16468903
>>16468829
Is banning ponies outside of /mlp/ censorship?
Anonymous at Sat, 9 Nov 2024 23:47:34 UTC No. 16468913
>>16468385
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psych
Anonymous at Sun, 10 Nov 2024 02:13:46 UTC No. 16469114
>>16468913
Yes, we all know /pol/tards do this all the time. It's simply a fact of life, sadly.
Anonymous at Sun, 10 Nov 2024 03:36:45 UTC No. 16469182
>>16468903
Yes, but it isn't ideal, and mlp stays on life support due to /mlp/ existing. Don't get it mistaken. If we stopped censoring /mlp/, the few horsefuckers remaining would dissolve into furry obscurity anyway. And if I'm wrong, and they wouldn't, then so what? MLP is such an oddly specific thing to talk about, while you can spin politics into every conversation with ease because it's so general and wide-reaching a subject. The censorship is minimal, to say the least, especially compared to Reddit.
Anonymous at Sun, 10 Nov 2024 03:41:45 UTC No. 16469184
>>16469182
Are you serious or have the weirdest fetish on the room for drawn ponies that act glowniggers
Anonymous at Sun, 10 Nov 2024 03:46:47 UTC No. 16469185
No fun allowed in this very serious scientific forum
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 10 Nov 2024 03:56:33 UTC No. 16469194
faggot nigger kike
Anonymous at Sun, 10 Nov 2024 04:06:16 UTC No. 16469203
>>16468368
This is what normies think science is.
Anonymous at Sun, 10 Nov 2024 14:52:53 UTC No. 16469639
>>16469184
I'm serious about them being censored when other fetish shit is allowed, yes.
Anonymous at Sun, 10 Nov 2024 14:53:51 UTC No. 16469640
>>16469639
I'll fart in yo mouf
GAY40