Anonymous at Mon, 11 Nov 2024 12:39:42 UTC No. 16470686

>>16470650
>If the electrons orbit the nucleus the same way planets orbit the sun
They don't.

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Nov 2024 12:40:11 UTC No. 16470687

>>16470686
proof?

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Nov 2024 12:40:38 UTC No. 16470688

>>16470686
this, google electron clouds

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Nov 2024 12:43:12 UTC No. 16470689

>>16470688
google isn't always right you know

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Nov 2024 12:52:12 UTC No. 16470697

>>16470687
Molecules exist.

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Nov 2024 12:53:17 UTC No. 16470698

>>16470697
galaxies also exist

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Nov 2024 13:05:28 UTC No. 16470706

>the Heisenberg uncertainty principle blocks your path

EK at Mon, 11 Nov 2024 13:16:38 UTC No. 16470717

>>16470650
yes

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Nov 2024 13:18:30 UTC No. 16470718

>>16470698
And?

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Nov 2024 13:21:29 UTC No. 16470721

>>16470718
the spatial composition of a galaxy looks like one of those molecules with hundreds of atoms, like a fullerene or a sucrose compound

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Nov 2024 13:28:35 UTC No. 16470725

>>16470721
And Sagitarius A* looks like my asshole after I eat spicy food. And?

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Nov 2024 13:29:45 UTC No. 16470726

I'd say 50/50. It's either there or it isn't

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Nov 2024 13:30:23 UTC No. 16470727

>>16470725
ok dude you need to chill

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Nov 2024 13:35:10 UTC No. 16470730

>>16470726
wouldn't then be 1/1? why 50/50? why are you making the assumption there are 100 electrons?

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Nov 2024 13:48:47 UTC No. 16470739

>>16470730
true, but actually 1/1 just simplifies down to 1. therefore the chance of an electron being inhabited by sentient life is 100%. Q.E.D. ∎

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Nov 2024 14:13:50 UTC No. 16470760

Google "actual images of atoms"

A device could not use light to detect these, a device had to use physical probing to gather info of structure:

But because electrons always cover up and bond nuclaei, the device touches electrons, and so provides an image of the shapes of electrons it touches.

It does not touch 1d points.

It touches what looks like globules of quicksilver

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Nov 2024 14:39:12 UTC No. 16470790

>>16470760
so? why can't those globules of quicksilver be inhabited?

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Nov 2024 14:50:56 UTC No. 16470803

>>16470739
50/50 also simplifies to 1

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Nov 2024 16:07:01 UTC No. 16470894

>>16470650
>what is the chance one of these electrons is inhabited by sentient life?
100%, it both is and isnt'.

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Nov 2024 20:09:20 UTC No. 16471191

>>16470790
>so? why can't those globules of quicksilver be inhabited?
Because when you see them in this images, how much absolute spatial volumetric area are each composed of would you say? Do you really think there are enough planck lengths on the electrons body for 'life form' to exist? Also look at how simple single cell life are, hown could life get any simpler?
And electron is not composed of anything, fundamental particle, you would then be suggesting much much much tinier still particles exist, not nessecarily making up the electrons body, but on it.

From those images had, and with abilities to enhance zoom, is there any evidence of signs of life on the electrons body?

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Nov 2024 20:14:53 UTC No. 16471196

>>16471191
the universe is fractal. electrons are made of atoms and molecules and our solar system is part of a chemical compound the size of our galaxy

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Nov 2024 23:45:48 UTC No. 16471402

>>16470688
electron clouds prove that they do have chaotic orbits

Anonymous at Tue, 12 Nov 2024 01:03:57 UTC No. 16471471

>>16471402
Nope, just an artifact of uncertainty.