Image not available

1090x844

Screenshot_2024-1....png

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ ๐Ÿงต Defining humans

Anonymous No. 16470674

Pulling this information from things I half remember and have good vibes (aka my ass) humans present with both predator and prey phenotypes which indicates that the success of humanity is from killing other humans.
Secular ages are when the predator type human population is low or controlled and religious ages are when the prey type human population is low or controlled.
The most human race would then be the one that is simultaneously able to be the most tame and lethal.
If anything in the past couple centuries has proven there is no competition in both of these regards for specifically the humans with the phenotypes in pic.
Anyone that doesn't look like the man or woman in the pic are categorically not human and a threat to humanity that must be controlled.

I am open to other definitions of humans that seem viable for explaining the success of modern civilization and might also indicate another race other than homo nordica is the preeminent human race.