Anonymous at Tue, 12 Nov 2024 19:20:41 UTC No. 16472256

>>16472233
Because elementary school brainwashed them into thinking reading = smart
Youtube videos with their pictures and sound transmit information into your brain at like 1000% the rate of the written word

Anonymous at Tue, 12 Nov 2024 20:44:22 UTC No. 16472356

>>16472256
brainlet

Anonymous at Tue, 12 Nov 2024 21:03:13 UTC No. 16472376

Books, articles, and papers provide an in-depth structure, but they can require more time and focus. Reading may be better when the topic requires understanding multiple viewpoints or a detailed, nuanced explanation.

Anonymous at Tue, 12 Nov 2024 21:10:29 UTC No. 16472387

>>16472233
I wonder if you could replicate the tactile memory boost of reading by slowly flipping through a book of blank pages as you watch a video.

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Nov 2024 05:11:21 UTC No. 16474361

>>16472256
They say a picture says a thousand words,
A video is 32 pictures a second

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Nov 2024 05:15:50 UTC No. 16474363

>>16474361
Now imagine a 4D video

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Nov 2024 05:24:12 UTC No. 16474371

>>16472233
google is antichrist
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8C_qHRrUZT0

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Nov 2024 05:28:10 UTC No. 16474377

That's completely false and you're a retard.

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Nov 2024 06:33:19 UTC No. 16474422

>>16472233
Reading is faster than listening in words per minute, also, youtube often shows some person, who's really not important to understand stuff. Sometimes animation helps, but textbooks also have pictures. Also you can't listen to music while watching video.

Also youtube is for normies. You're normie.

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Nov 2024 06:37:07 UTC No. 16474428

>>16474422
And I omitted the fact, that journals have far much better indexed search than youtube videos.